BBC BIAS TO REMAIN UNEXPOSED

"Strawdog" wrote the following in response to the previous thread

"propaganda, such 'negative' images of the followers of the nonce 'prophet's' death cult are unlikely to see the light of day (I can't recall seeing the scenes described in this report on my television)."

The thread that strawdog made this comment on was about the demo in London yesterday bu Izzadeen supporters and the fact that this was not seen on the  news.

Well in an attempt to answer such questions the BBC have provided the answer, here it is people:-


Report on BBC's anti-Israel bias will stay secret


"The BBC has won its legal battle to block the publication of a report into alleged bias in its reporting of Middle East affairs.

A ruling obtained under freedom of information legislation had obliged the corporation to make the internal audit public.

But that decision was overturned by the High Court.

The BBC's decision to spend an estimated £200,000 of licence feepayers' money to keep the Balen Report secret has been widely condemned."

This bunch of Gobs on sticks have stopped the publication of the bias report, I wonder why?, now as we all know the BBC is the mouthpiece of the Blair Government, the BBC does what the Government says, this includes how events are reported.

The bias that we all know exists in the BBC towards anything Islamic is the reason that the report has been sat on, the BBC and the Government could not allow anything into the public domain that confirms that bias.

This could be and in my opinion, probably is, the reason that images portraying Islam in a negative light are least likely to be shown on the BBC.

The BBC will however highlight to the fullest extent possible anything which in their opinion is degrogatory towards the Religion of Peace.

To this end the BBC will import multifarious "experts" to drive the "islamophobia machine" and to convince us, that those people who blow us up and insult our country and flag are really "nice people" who do not wish us any harm at all.

The BBC has good reason to hide this report, after all telling the truth in certain areas is not in their remit.

Gandalf


 

What did you think of this article?




Trackbacks
  • No trackbacks exist for this post.
Comments

  • 28 Apr 2007, 7:57 PM strawdog wrote:
    Gandalf,

    I imagine that there may be some sort of governmental influence in this news management of mohammedan affairs. Maybe a memo pointing out the 'need to maintain community relations' or such like? We'll probably never know.

    Anyway, given that mohammedans are the favoured conscience accessories of the liberal elites in this county (the white working class going out of fashion sometime after the miners' strike) we can only expect a bias towards 'positive images' of them, as is demanded by political correctness.

    As an aside, '633 Squadron' (pro-Allies propaganda) is on ITV4 as I write this. May I suggest that it would have been better if Germany had won WW2? After all, there'd be a European super state to counter US cultural and economic dominance, and, of course, there'd be no Jews (let alone a Zionist state) to antagonise mohammedan sensibilities. Surely orla guerin would agree???
    Reply to this
  • 28 Apr 2007, 8:43 PM Sir HM wrote:
    Strawdog:

    Here it is. Read it all, it'll horrify you when you hit the significant bits.

    http://www.communities.gov.uk/pub/401/ReportingDiversity_id1502401.pdf

    It's not just the BBC: it's the whole of the media - and journalists run the risk of jail if they violate this guide (it says that in the guide).
    Reply to this
  • 29 Apr 2007, 7:02 AM strawdog wrote:
    Sir HM,

    thank you (?) for pointing me in the direction of the offending article, needless to say I almost vomited my breakfast over my monitor...

    Well, I suppose its what you'd expect, full of all the Newspeak buzzwords and progressive delusions. However, surely its the case that the majority of the journalistic classes don't need any guidance in 'correct' reporting, given that they're 'correct' thinkers anyway? The fact that their union recently voted to boycott Israeli goods surely points to this I think.

    Concerning legal sanctions against thought crime, I predict that if any of the anti-jihadi blogs run by British citizens begins to be influential in any way then we could see the first show trial and subsequent imprisonment.
    Reply to this
Leave a comment

 Name

 Email (will not be published)

 Website

Your comment is 0 characters limited to 3000 characters.