>
http://www.geertwilders.nl/
MUSLIM STUDENT 'WITCH HUNT' OPPOSED
Excerpt:
"Academics have vowed to oppose the Government's drive to tackle Islamic extremism in universities, condemning the initiative as a "witch-hunt" against Muslim students.
Ministers want universities to work with the police to report students suspected of holding violent extremist views.
But members of the University and College Union (UCU) voted unanimously to boycott the Government's call for academics to "inform on" their students"
*****Perhaps the above article ought to be retitled - UK Academics Refuse To Report Terrorists*****
It is bad enough that UK universities have become a portal for muslims, and their multiple wives (see my 29/05/07 post - Thousands of Muslim Men Live In Polygamous Marraiges in the UK) to enter and then remain in the UK now these enablers refuse to take any responsibility for those Muslim men & women.
Yet another case of people situated in protected jobs who refuse to what is right for the British people choosing instead to jut out their determined chins and then tout their irresponsibility as courage. As citizens of the UK, these academics have a responsibility FIRST to the British people (who pay the academics wages) and to the Country who's young men & women fight and die (past & present) to maintain the freedoms of speech that these academics seek to hide behind.
What these soft headed looney lefties don't seem to realize is that if Sharia Law takes over the UK their freedoms to teach and act (& stick out their chins), as currently allowed under British law, will disappear in a heartbeat.
Are these "brave" academics willing to stand infront of the bereaved families of the London bombings and justify their position?
Typical of the double standards in Britain.
About three years ago a non-political Club I belonged to was infiltrated by “Asians” and members of what the Daily Mirror call the “respected political detectives” of the Searchlight organisation. The reason was one of our members was a BNP activist but this was unknown to all except one or two officials who took the view that as we were non-political we had no reason to expel him.
I only found out when a long-standing invitation to address a branch of the Rotary Club was withdrawn a week before the event. I was understandably annoyed when I told our President, but he said it was probably because “X” was a member of the BNP and was going to be “outed” in the local paper the following week.
It only cost me a free lunch and a modest fee that would have been donated to cancer charities. The BNP man was obliged to leave the family business which was heavily reliant on NHS work, another one member of the club who had been trying to join the police had their application inexplicably deferred again and again. So I reckon I got off lightly.
BTW Searchlight is funded by the government from the National Lottery so political spying is OK if the left does it.
Reply to this