>
http://www.geertwilders.nl/
JIHAD WATCH BANNED BY USA CITY & BUSINESSES
Big Brother is watching AND PREVENTING adults from accessing certain web sites declaring they are "hate speech". Yet free access remains to the pro terrorist web site CAIR (Council on American-Islamic Relations) and is highly likely to be behind the banning of the site.
http://www.danielpipes.org/article/394 is
July 3, 2007
Jihad Watch: Banned in Chicago!
It's ironic that just as mainstream articles are appearing that say about Islam and jihad what I've been saying for years -- although they've not appeared in the U.S., and were not written by me -- I've been getting word that Jihad Watch is banned in various places.
First, an email from a Jihad Watch reader:
I work in government for the City of Chicago. As inevitable as it is to use the Internet while at work (though discouraged unless it is for offficial business, the reality is that most every employee invariably checks the Internet), I found that your website was officially blocked as of today, Monday July 2, 2007. It was not blocked for the past few years even up until last Friday. You may find it interesting to note that CAIR's website is fully accessible, along with other virulent jihad-oriented websites. When my secular infidel co-workers and I, equally interested in the excellent anti-hate (idem est jihad) material that you provide attempted to access your site today, we received a notice "Blocked. Category: Hate Speech."
I also received this email yesterday:
The PC police at Bank of America have Denied Access to jihadwatch.org.
And this one:
Roberto, Here I am in Denver for training on my new job...staying at the Red Lion Hotel....I go down to the business center here and try to access Jihad Watch....They have something called SITE COACH that will not allow access to the site---reason---HATE MONGERING.
Now, I've long been used to the tactic used by jihadists and their allies -- labeling any opposition to the jihad ideology, and particularly any exploration of the elements of Islam that the jihadists use to incite violence, as "hatemongering." But that doesn't mean I am going to acquiesce to it. This site is dedicated to the defense of human rights against the depredations of jihad supremacism, which would subjugate women and religious minorities. There is nothing hateful about that, and nothing to apologize for.
So if anyone reading this knows of any way to contact the relevant authorities at the city of Chicago, Bank of America, and/or "Site Coach," please pass them along. We are not going to be silenced without offering resistance.
ADDENDUM: Another. This just in:
Same thing happened at Fidelity Investments, your (great) site is now blocked.
Again: if anyone knows any way I can deal with this and try to reverse it, please let me know
end of article
link:
http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/017237.php
It highly likely that this is occurring in the UK & Europe. These sleazy Muslim organizations will attack our societies in any way they can and the behind-the-scenes clout that they hold with government and businesses is vast.
Banks & Businesses are twisting themselves into pretzels to follow Sharia law in order to garner Muslim accounts and clients thus is it CERTAIN that the above companies are bending backwards to appease Muslims by blocking Jihadwatch.
http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/05_32/b3946141_mz035.htm
We must remember that the purpose of Jihad is not necessarily a military conquest of lands but islamification of the people in those countries. Economic jihad is an insidious incremental way to impose Sharia law on us all. .
THIS BLATENT CENSORSHIP WILL LIKELY INCREASE & DOES NOT BODE WELL FOR THOSE OF US WHO ARE TRYING TO ALERT THE WORLD TO THE DANGERS OF ISLAM.
What Jihad Watch is experiencing is just the beginning and can be compared to a small sore that will become infected and spread leading to generalized sepsis of our freedoms. The time for action is NOW!
Categories: Truth about Islam, Dhimmi Watch, Politics of Islam, Islam in USA
gandalf
The time for action is indeed now. But who is going to stand up? And what is he going to say? Is he going to follow the party line and say,"All of us in the diverse communities of Britain have to be vigilant, and win the hearts and minds of those who would like nothing better to explosively disrupt our shared values of diversity, blah blah ".
There is no Churchill on the horizon or anywhere. In the UK, parliament is supreme, and we want one MP at the least, to give us an insurance policy. BUT not one MP is going to stick his neck out and have it chopped off.
NOTE: Multiculturalism is not dead. It is now masquerading as "DIVERSITY".
Reply to this
Meanwhile
Brown’s spokesman, said: “There is clearly a need to strike a consensual tone in relation to all communities across the UK. It is important that the country remains united.”
How can one be united when we have diverse communities and diverse cultures. Then there is also Islam, a culture, which makes no pretense that of accepting multiculralism/diversity. It wants to takeover/rule/be dominant.
The whole concept of multicultralism/diversity is alien to the concept of the nation state, which is based on a common culture and language.
It is not possible to be "diverse" and "unified" at the same time. It is a logical absurdity.
Reply to this
Chamberlain’s heirs
I had assumed that Sayeeda Warsi, newly appointed by David Cameron as the Tories’ shadow minister for Community Cohesion, was a Muslim committed to fighting rather than appeasing Islamist extremism. There was surely no way that, in today’s circumstances, Cameron could have appointed someone who was not. However shallow and opportunistic his repositioning strategy might be, he would surely be extremely careful to appoint someone who was absolutely beyond reproach as unequivocally opposed to both terrorism and extremism. How wrong can you be. The website conservative.home has just posted up a jaw-dropping revelation of Ms Warsi’s views. Here’s a taste:
READ IT ALL. MUST READ.
http://www.melaniephillips.com/diary/
Reply to this
These are not Chamberlain's heirs. I think Chamberlain gets too bad a press. Chamberlain was a decent and upright man. Knowing the horrors of WW1, he had to give Hitler a chance. Yet when Poland was attacked, he gave Germany a 24 hr ultimatum. When it expired, he immediately declared war and then honourably resigned.
What the present lot of politicians in the UK are doing, is beyond comprehension. Or should I say,"inconceivable".
Reply to this
gandalf
There is something going in the minds of politicians that needs a psychiatric approach. What is motivating them or what fear is driving them towards destruction of the UK. What is it that they see, that the rest of Infidel world dont?
Reply to this
In the past I would get very angry with people who said "this country is finished". Now I find myself thinking the very same thing. I am afraid, very afraid. Not of moslems but of the politicians. I don't know what it is they see but I'm beginning to realize they are all completely barking mad. A long time ago I read an article explaining how one group would use another to gain power (as in Hitler and the moslems)without realizing they were the ones being used. I wonder if this is what our politicians are doing, perhaps they feel sure that in the end islam will become westernized. What a surprise the people of this country will have when the evil takes over.
Reply to this
DP - everyone. Please. Please read this:
"" Time and again these days, national governments let in all sorts of people who belong somewhere else. Pretty soon the country has so many that the government comes to fear them. At that point the problem passes beyond easy solution. So politicians paper over everything, and make concessions to buy a year’s peace. The newcomers breed and increase. By and by the remaining possibilities are acquiescence or civil war.
Which latter, boys and girls, isn’t impossible.
[ ... ]
The assiduously courted invasion usually rests on a curious idealism that I find hard to credit in adults. The notion is that we are all just people, brothers under the skin, that all we need is love and understanding, black and white together, kum bah ya; only a few reactionary forces need to be stilled to bring about universal bliss. This happy thought doesn’t surprise me among students in high school. Politicians aren’t.
Has no one noticed that diversity doesn’t work? Putting together peoples with little in common begs for trouble, usually with success. It is the chief source of the world’s bloodshed and enmity.
[ ... ]
But what have facts to do with foreign relations? It is much more entertaining to base policy on adolescent theories and see what happens.
[ ... ]
When the anticipated melding fails and riots ensue, the response is to try to buy, or legislate, the impossible. Invariably the cry arises that the government hasn’t done enough for the indigent arrivals. We must spend more money on welfare, on schools, on special programs to raise the unraisable and mix the immiscible. It is our fault really. We need to change our outmoded attitudes, require classes on ethnic sensitivity, celebrate the culture of the new incompatibles. We will have National Islamic History Week, and children will make mosques from construction paper. That will fix everything.
Instead the problem gets worse. The majority population becomes angrier, but has no recourse. The government is against them. The immigrants can loot and burn, and nothing is likely to happen to them: Punishing their misbehavior would engender more violence, which the government wants to avoid at any cost. If the citizenry defend themselves, as for example by shooting arsonists, the government will put them in prison. Citizens have much to lose; the malefactors do not.
A spring is thus wound.
Moslems in particular are poison. A failed civilization, Islam sends its unsuccessful, thus double failures, to Europe. They gravitate to slums because they can do nothing else. Cohesive, angry, ineffectual, with no loyalty to their new home, they neither flourish nor assimilate. Resentment grows among them. And so the cities burn.
[ ... ]
Incomprehensibly, permitting their entry has been a deliberate decision. Europe could have kept these swarming newcomers out by simply not letting them in. No visa, no work permit, instant deportation. It didn’t. Now France and Cont. next post.
Reply to this
"" ... Holland are on the edge. Amsterdam could be the next Paris. England, once a delightful land of safety and civility, becomes in parts a North African slum. I have no sympathy. They made the choice. But why did they do it?
[ ... ]
People and governments by nature temporize, avert their eyes from forthcoming catastrophe, eschew the needful but unpleasant, and do not readily believe that the status quo can abruptly change. But it can, and does, and is. Meanwhile absurd intellectuals write pointless articles in glossy magazines. Soon it will be too late for civilized answers.
Then what? That is the question.
Read it all
http://www.fredoneverything.net/FOE_Frame_Column.htm
Then select other posts from the sidebar on the left for some of the most wonderfully sardonic writing you'll ever read.
Miner: thanks for pointing me in this man's direction.
Reply to this
So now it's happening to JW.
And Charles has been having LGF/Digg problems
Seems to be a co-ordinated campaign to pick sites off, because I just read this in the comments on Foehammer:
http://foehammer.net/2007/07/how-to-peacefully-remove-muslims-from-your-own-neighborhood.html#comments">http://foehammer.net/2007/07/how-to-peacefully-remove-muslims-from-your-own-neighborhood.html#comments
""
Now get THIS - the entire Foehammer website has been banned from Digg.
I tried to digg a story from this blog, with Digg url:
digg.com/submit?phase=2&url=h...s-killing-american-soldiers.html
Then I was greeted with a message saying that the entire Foehammer.net domain has been froze out!
Foehammer
http://foehammer.net Jul 4th, 2007 at 12:52 pm
Thanks for the heads-up. I just emailed the Digg team and made a kindly inquiry as to why they have taken such action. Let’s see what sort of response I get before I turn green with muscles and start breaking things all over the Blogosphere.
TwitThis ""
Reply to this
I have tried leaving a post on foehammer
very difficult
are the attacks beginning?
Reply to this
Well Gandalf, Britney British was subjected to an organised troll once. I managed to put a stop to it by outflanking them and putting a stop to all their various ongoing trolls, which ranged from a small Christian blog, via Doughty Street to the Daily Mail - and many points in between (I've explained on the above linked page of Foehammer how I did it - but I'll explain again here if anyone wants me to).
I suppose it's only a matter of time before they get around to here. The trolls I dealt with were not muzbots, but followers of a strange bunch with an ideology (they call it a religion) called Principia Discordia. Google it. Also a reasonable entry on Wiki.
Wow - up to and including the full stop after "Wiki", 666 characters. Yup, that's me. Had a m/bike with that number once = it was a serious beast of a bike, and I had 'The Beast' professionally painted in Gold on its black tank. Went down a treat in biking circles.
Reply to this