Trackbacks

• No trackbacks exist for this post.

Comments

• 9 Jul 2007, 7:30 PM Sir HM wrote:
  "" It strikes me that this network of spies already exists, they are called bloggers, all MI5 has to do is read the blogs for the latest info, I wonder if they do read them, who knows?. ""
  
  Hah - when I emailed that comment to MI5 yesterday, I added a bit of my own. The bit I added was exactly what you just said - the way I put it was: "why don't you use us? "
  
  Let's face it, we are a resource available to them. So why DON'T they use us? Thousands of us all around the country. All they have to do is let us know who they want us to keep an eye on. They're the experts at investigation, and have sources of information and other resources we can only dream about. But they still need people to do the dull 'keeping an eye on' stuff - because sure as hell THEY don't have the manpower to do it. We're here, they know which side we're on, they probably also know exactly who each one of us is, where we live and what our phone numbers are (I always work on that assumption anyway). So why aren't we getting visits from them?
  
  Strange.
  Reply to this
• 9 Jul 2007, 8:33 PM Ben wrote:
  http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=467280&in_page_id=1770
  
  It will be interesting to see how this develops.... :-)
  Reply to this
• 9 Jul 2007, 8:37 PM Addie Nuff wrote:
  Sir Alan West urges "snitching" describing it as a little bit "unBritish" but needing to be done.
  
  We all know he's talking to muslims....since when have they been British in the first place?
  
  The only people to be trusted to give any credible information are people who love this country and it's culture and that is certainly not anybody of muslim persuasion.
  Reply to this
  1. 9 Jul 2007, 10:13 PM Anonymous wrote:
     Addie Nuff wrote:
     Sir Alan West urges "snitching" describing it as a little bit "unBritish" but needing to be done.
     
     So Alan West thinks that turning Britain into a police state along the lines of "1984" is acceptable, where children snitch on their parents, and friends snitch on each other.
     
     Isnt it less harmful to all that Muslims be removed from the UK, rather then turn the entire country turned into a police state.
     
     Th constant refrain from the BBC, Ch4, Times etc, is that of a tiny minority. Some tiny minority, that is, at the least 50% of the Muslim population, and that wishes to have shari'a in the UK.
     
     As for terrorists - if Muslim doctors, who have taken an oath to save lives, can engage in Jihad, how is it possible to trust any Muslim. Trust between Muslims and the wider community, is now finished. The civic society is dying, and all this goivernment has in mind, is how to raise taxes by criminalising the motorist.
     Reply to this
• 9 Jul 2007, 9:38 PM DP111 wrote:
  Using rape as a weapon - Diane E. King, cultural anthropologist, fellow with the Howard Foundation of Brown University and a researcher at Washington State University.
  
  

  In the kind of patriliny found in Iraq, procreation is imagined via a seed and soil metaphor. During ethnographic research I have carried out since 1995, Iraqi Kurds have explained to me their understanding that, during sex, a man "plants a seed" in a woman. This seed is then nurtured in the "soil" of the womb. Only the seed is seen to contribute the essence of the child. I once heard it explained by a proponent of this cultural theory that a child who bears resemblance to his or her mother is a product of a seed that failed to fend off permeation by some of the soil during gestation. This could lead, I was told, to ridicule of the child's father for producing weak seed.
  
  Rape is always humiliating, always a violation, always awful. But under patrilineal cultures, it can also be a tool of sectarian discord and even genocide. This is the case in Iraq, where rape is frequently used as a weapon of sectarian conflict. When a Shiite militiaman rapes a Sunni woman, for example, he is seen as potentially implanting a Shiite individual into her womb. He is causing her to suffer dual humiliations: She is sexually violated, with all of the personal implications that that would carry in any culture. But the rape further serves like a Trojan Horse: Thereafter, an offspring bearing the rapist's identity may well be hidden inside her body, an enemy who will emerge in nine months.
  

  
  http://www.iht.com/articles/2007/07/08/opinion/edking.php
  
  This is an important article with academic credibilty. It explains the behaviour of Muslim men in war and peace, and as immigrants in non-Muslim countries.
  
  It explains
  1. Honour killings
  2. The increasing incidence of rapes in Sweden and other Scandinavian countries by Muslims.
  3. When there is difficulty in a marriage between a Muslim man and a Western woman, the man kidnaps the children and flees to a Muslim nation
  4. Why Muslim courts almost invariably hand custody of the children to the father – another reason why shari’a must never be recognised in the West, and especially not for family matters.
  5. The Pakistani Muslims who gang raped girls in Australia asked the court to consider “cultural” factors in mitigation.
  
  Please post this article on other websites for widest dissemination.
  Reply to this
  1. 9 Jul 2007, 10:15 PM Anonymous wrote:
     Humiliation of the Kuffar is a major motivator for Islamic jihadic rape in Europe. But it isn't the Kuffar woman who the Muslim is humiliating (her status is so low that she can hardly be humiliated any further). The typical Muslim rapist is in fact attempting to humiliate the woman's 'owner' by 'contaminating' his property as explained above.
     
     The Muslim's twisted worldview is vicious, paranoid and tribal.
     
     There is NO place for these savages in civilised society. Kick the vermin out of Europe NOW.
     Reply to this
     1. 9 Jul 2007, 10:38 PM DP111 wrote:
        anon wroteThere is NO place for these savages in civilised society.
        
        I dont think there is any hope for Britain or the West, unless Muslims are removed. This can be done in a civilised manner, explaining why it is necessary, ie for the prevention of a great evil, such as a civil war that will lead to countless deaths and "unmanaged" ethnic cleansing, or another evil, such as a police state.
        
        Repatriation can take place with financial assistance for the families, as well the recipient Muslim nation. It is the only humane solution available, barring ofcourse the unlikely event that "British" Muslims denounce and reject Islam totally and unambiguously.
        Reply to this
• 9 Jul 2007, 10:17 PM DP111 wrote:
  Addie Nuff
  
  The post in response to you was from me.
  Reply to this
• 9 Jul 2007, 11:45 PM DP111 wrote:
  Great article by Hugh Fitzgerald on Alan West
  -----------------
  
  Alan West said, "I have a lot of Muslim friends and they see themselves as British. We've got to be very careful. The threat is to our British way of life and all of our British people."-- from a statement by Alan West, recently appointed in the UK to "sort out" the problem of "radical" Islam
  
  Is Admiral Sir Alan West familiar with Muhammad's famous statement that "war is deception"? Is he familiar with how so much in Muhammad's life -- to the great admiration of Muslims -- put into practice what he preached, for he deceived those who would not succumb to him, whether individuals or tribes, and relished their gory fate -- Muhammad, "uswa hasana" and "al-insan al-kamil"?
  
  Does Alan West know for a certainty that although he has a "lot of Muslim friends," the only reason those friends do not tell him about Qur'an 5.51, which tells Muslims they must not take "Jews and Christians as friends" and that in many other places, in the Qur'an, and in the Hadith, explains the evil of Unbelievers and why they are to be shunned, is because they are embarrassed by all this, and want to spare his feelings? And is that why they also refrain from telling him about why Muslims are taught that it is permissible to feign temporary friendship with Infidels for one purpose: to promote and protect Islam? Are these teachings familiar to Alan West?
  
  http://www.jihadwatch.org/dhimmiwatch/archives/017323.php#comments
  
  Read it all.
  Reply to this
  1. 10 Jul 2007, 9:07 AM urban11 wrote:
     Of course not, he hasn't got a clue. The real trouble is that decent (or gullible) people want to believe there is good in all things. They find it difficullt,or painful to believe that a belief system that one fifth of the world's people belong to is evil and totally shite.
     Reply to this
• 10 Jul 2007, 1:27 AM Anonymous wrote:
  http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=467280&in_page_id=1770
  Reply to this
• 10 Jul 2007, 10:25 AM najistani wrote:
  Muslim terrorists are to be described as 'Non-Buddhist activists'
  
  Car bombs are 'Traffic incidents'
  
  Anthrax is '48 hour flu'
  
  Ricin is 'Bean sauce'
  
  Dhimmitude is 'Interfaith dialogue'
  
  Dirty bomb radiation is 'Magic moonbeams'
  
  Muslim criminality is 'Cultural enrichment'
  
  Pedophile rings are 'Koranic study groups'
  
  Grooming is 'Youth outreach'
  
  Kebab takeaways are 'Protein recycling facilities'
  
  Planes crashing into buildings are 'Air traffic control errors'
  
  Al Quada policemen are 'Community liaison officers'
  
  Muslim medical malpractice is 'Patient mortality rate variability'
  Reply to this
  1. 10 Jul 2007, 11:15 AM urban11 wrote:
     Brilliant! Orwellian Newspeak
     Reply to this
• 10 Jul 2007, 11:05 PM Anonymous wrote:
  I have come home from the hospital feeling very upset. All the radiation sources have disappeared from the oncology department - probably those Buddhists up to their tricks again.
  
  The kaffir hospital management (Inshallah may they soon die of strange, undiagnosable ailments and be replaced by Islamic brothers) called an emergency meeting addressed by a kaffir police officer.
  
  This institutionally-racist representative of the oppressive Zionist-Crusader alliance said that the radiation sources could be "Used by terrorists to make a dirty bomb".
  
  I was extremely hurt and distressed by this statement. I forcefully pointed out that there is no such thing as a terrorist - Gordon Brown (pbuh) himself has said so. The word 'terrorist' is hate speech - it is a racist term of abuse used by bigots, Islamophobes and BNP supporters (Inshallah may they find themselves upon our operating tables tended by Muslim anaesthetists) to vilify peaceful Muslims.
  
  
  I have written to Sir Ian B.Liar demanding the officer's dismissal and prosecution for racist verbal assault. I intend to sue the Metropolitan Police for the post-traumatic emotional stress this appalling incident has caused me, and will continue to cause me for the next fifty years. I have been examined by four independent Muslim psychiatrists who will vouch for my mental suffering (I'll accept an out of court settlement of £500, 000 in a five-way split, Inshallah)
  
  I just hope I've recovered enough by next week to be able to attend the annual dinner of the Muslim Medical Malpractitioners' Association. My colleague Dr Aggun I. Singh-Deth will be receiving the Dr Josef Mengele (pbuh) Prize for innovation in surgical procedures, and I am due to give a presentation on performance evaluation for our new Dr Harold Shipman (pbuh) Award for meeting mortality rate targets (One point for a standard kaffir, two for a dancing slag, three for a Jew, four for an Islamophobic blogger, five for an apostate and 100 for Sir Salman Rushdie).
  
  I must finish now, as night has fallen and I have noticed a strange green light in the back of my car. Probably glowworms.
  
  Dr C. Riyal Kilah
  Muslim Medical Malpractitioners Association
  'You'll need more than an apple a day to keep us away' TM
  Reply to this

Leave a comment