>
http://www.geertwilders.nl/
DO WE "CRY HAVOC AND UNLEASH THE DOGS OF WAR"-MAYBE
The murder of any person is appalling and it is only right that the perpetrators of the crime are caught and severely punished, preferably by the death sentence, alas this does not happen in the UK especially if the victim happens to have held opinions that are deemed "unacceptable" by the "ruling Elite".
Voltaire is one of my personal hero's, his famous quote is on the header of this site, he would be spinning in his grave if he were aware of what is happening in the UK.
No longer is a person free in the UK to voice his or her concerns and when they are murdered because of their views it is the victims fault.
The evil alliance between the liberal left and the Muslim population of this country has spawned a fascism that is so destructive and virulent innocent opinionated people can be murdered and the murder is virtually justified because a voice against the establishment has been silenced.
The Murder of Ken Brown demonstrates this situation very clearly, the press identified Mr Brown as a member of the BNP, yet protected the identities and nationalities of the accused.
The Mayor of London Ken Livingstone has stated that it is OUR fault that Muslims want to kill us"Worse still, Ken Livingstone, London's quixotic leftist mayor, has shifted the blame from the terrorists to the British at large, who are supposedly tempted by "Islamophobia."
Thus, Livingstone works his way into a logical impasse: Do we dislike them because they want to kill us, or do they want to kill us because we dislike them? He implies that the main blame must lie with the British government and its U.S. allies, especially President Bush, who has declared war on terror rather than seeking to cuddle it."
Attitudes such as this actually give tacit permission to the Muslims in the UK that it is OK to kill us if we do not like them.
Clearly in the UK if you hold views that are not prescribed by the left and its main stream media supporters such as the Guardian or BBC you are a lesser person who's death is less than significant, what happens if the crime is reversed for want of a better phrase, this is what happens:
An attack on a Muslim man in Cheltenham was racially motivated, police have said.The 38-year-old man was walking along the Honeybourne Line in the Gloucestershire town on 5 July when he was approached by several white youths.
The youths shouted racial abuse at the man before forcing him to the side of the track and throwing beer into his face.
The man was left unhurt but shaken and distressed by the attack, police said.
Det Con Jeff Manners said: "This was a cowardly and unprovoked attack on a local Muslim man as he was returning from work.
"The group thought he was linked to terrorism purely by his visual appearance.
"By spraying him with alcohol and making him feel unclean is a serious insult to his faith."
The above is clearly not a case of murder but look at the language used, note "the several white youths" > The colour of the youths skin was immediately identified thus implanting in the readers head that the offenders were white UK and Islamophobic.
This identification did not occur in Mr Browns case-why?
There would appear to be a two tier legal system operating in the Media and this has to be exposed.
The situation in the UK is now reaching critical level, there are over 4000 known plotters who want to destroy our lifestyle, we have bombings, attempted bombings, we have Muslims calling for the death of our head of state and declaring dominion over the UK. The 4000 are the tip of the Iceberg, in reality we all know that there are many thousands more.
I feel we are now entering a stage where the public will have to defend itself, the official law enforcement organizations are failing us daily, yes they will point to the successful thwarting of plots to blow us up etc whilst allowing many more Muslims through our porous borders without a check.
The fact of the matter is we should not have to be placed in a situation where we have to defend ourselves but we are and if the authorities allow this situation to continue and grow then we have the right to defend ourselves and our families.
Do we really have to say "Cry havoc and unleash the dogs of war", maybe we do
It's irrelevant whether it's 4000, 40,000 or 400,000 plotters.
The plain fact is that Islam is a terrorist cult which seeks to kill and enslave all Kuffars as its number one priority.
Therefore everyone who calls himself a Muslim is a terrorist, by intention if not by direct action.
Muslims have never been able to live on equal terms with the Kuffar. They are always working towards supremacy, and if they are thwarted or unable to enforce their will by political means they turn to mass-murder.
Peaceful co-existence is impossible. It's us or them.
Reply to this
There is no way we can differentiate between the "moderate" or radical fanatic muslim. Besides the non- fanatics provide a protective environment from which the Islamists operate.
There is no alternative but the removal of all Muslims, or Britain is finished as a historic nation with a unique culture and identity.
Reply to this
This again shows the anti-white racism of the government and the media, if they detail the fact that these were white youths doing this to a Muslim then they should also point out that it was a Muslim stabbing a man in the back in the Stoke on Trent case where a man was murdered, this is racism pure and simple.
A large percentage of the Muslims want to kill us, the best that you an say of the rest is that they will give tacit acceptance to that, while a few and I mean a small number stand up for us, but they are not really Muslims.
The other difference between the two attacks, well the one involving white youths did not result in the death of the victim, while the Muslims killed the white man. This tolerance on our part can not continue and any government that continues to think that we will continue to accept eating chicken shit and accept heavier penalties then those applied to Muslims will find itself just as much of an enemy of the people as the Muslims undoubtably are.
Reply to this
First demonise then eliminate
This is precisely what was done to the Serbs.
If any people in Europe have suffered from the abomination that is Islam, it must be the Serbs. But they stood fast and resolute aagainst the Islamic invaders from the east. Then they stood steadfast and alone against the Nazis. For which we thanked them by bombing them and handing over the half of their country to the Muslims.
What is our political elite afraid of? There will come a time when they will have more reason to fear Kuffars.
Reply to this
Off topic but an interesting story I think.
http://news.sky.com/skynews/article/0,,30100-1274613,00.html
Reply to this
From the link
"He is the most beautiful person I have ever met. His heart is pure, he is pious, quiet, a true gentleman, and he is my best friend."
That is what the relatives of all suicide bombers and terrorists claim. "We are shocked, SHOCKED. He was such nice boy, would not hurt a fly, and pious (alarm bells).
Reply to this
If the British can't recognize the moral depravity in this story then there is no hope.
The degenerate leftofascists have their boot on the neck of the UK.
Unleash the dogs of war!!
Reply to this
I read this today: Khudayr Taher: Europe and America Should Deport All Muslims - Including Myself
Khudayr Taher, an Iraqi Shi'ite writer living in the U.S. and a regular contributor to the liberal Elaph website, had a quite illiberal suggestion - he asked why Europe and America shouldn't deport their Muslim populations. He wrote:
"Countries have the right to defend themselves and assure their citizens' safety from terrorism. Likewise, it is clear that the source of the terrorist crimes in Europe and America is the Muslims who live in these countries.
"The security services cannot know people's intentions and sort out who is the noble immigrant and who is a terrorist criminal. [But] wherever there are Muslims, their presence has produced crimes of terrorism and murder.
"Among those Muslims in Europe and America who do not practice terrorism, most of them do not have loyalty and sincere attachment to these countries that have offered them all of the means of life in dignity - housing, studies, work, and citizenship…
"The legitimate question is this: Since the security services cannot sort out the good immigrant from the bad terrorist… why don't these countries deport all Muslims, of all races, from Europe and America, and [thus] find rest from the danger of terrorism, and protect their peoples?
"I, as an Arab Muslim immigrant, sincerely call on the countries of Europe and America to deport all Muslims from their territories - including myself, despite my love and my sincere attachment to the U.S…"
You've got to admire this guy's integrity. DEPORT ALL MUSLIMS? With a government like ours there's no fucking chance.
Reply to this
Here is the link
http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=29103
----------------------------------
It is high time at the least to start considetring this as an option. But the government is planning to increase immigration. I can understand why. They know that they are deeply unpopular, and if an election was held now, they will lose power, and not be elected again for a generation atleast.
They are in a race against the clock, to get as many immigrants who will vote Labour before the next election. Just remeber, in the UK, the elction is generally even,y balanced. It does not take much to tilt the balance.
Reply to this
There is another advantage to this. Only a shock of this magnitude, the global setback to the Jihad and its lockup, as well as, having to cope with an expanding population, will make Muslims realise that Islam is not the way. Nothing else will do.
Reply to this
DP
These words of yours just triggered an intuition in my head (have you any knowledge of the latest thinking on exactly what an intuition is? Apparently unrelated facts and events here and there are linked together in your head by a last final fact/event and Bingo! - an intuition):
"" Just remeber, in the UK, the elction is generally even,y balanced. It does not take much to tilt the balance. ""
Our elections are generally decided in relatively few constituencies, and by just a few percentage points of vote, in those constituencies.
Well ... you know the way they're distributing the new migrants around the country ... well some more ... what if this is taken into account in their calculations on which migrants, and how many, go where? Just a couple of thousand new Labour voters in a swing constituency might make the difference between winning and losing that constituency.
Nahhh ... I'm just paranoid. Aren't I?
If there's anything to this thought, then it would make Shirley Porter's gerrymandering look like a game of draughts.
Anyone out there got the investigative skills to look into it? Any police readers got the integrity? Any lawyer readers got the nerve to bring a case that would force disclosure of documents?
Reply to this
For example, the town I live in is solid Labour, and has been continuously since 1906. The MP gets something like 60% of the vote; the council is overwhelmingly stitched up. And - co-incidence I'm sure - we get very few of the migrants.
It's worth noting a couple of things in respect of this: migrants from the Commonwealth countries e.g. Pakistan, BanglaDesh, the Muslims from India, Nigeria, are all entitled to vote in all our elections from the day they set foot here. Migrants from the EU e.g. Poles, Romanians, are entitled to vote in our local authority and EU elections from the day they set foot here.
Just a thought.
Reply to this
SHM - Nahhh ... I'm just paranoid. Aren't I?
I dont think it is paranoia at all. Politicians will sacrifice anything to retain power - including betraying the nation. It is like possessing the Ring. The power is illusory but its possession is all that matters. That is why in the recent "doctor terrorists" case, politicians were willing to go down the "racist" road just to absolve Muslims and retain their vote.
It wouldnt surprise me one bit that immigrants are being shunted all over the country, depending on the marginality of the constituency.
How does one get the information? Is it available on the Home office site? Can we demand the information using the Freedom of information act?
Keep an eye on the EU via EU referendum. This is another more active threat, that is sneaking up on us while the nation's attention is on Muslims.
Now even the nay sayers are belatedly recognising the stupidity of allowing Muslims into Britain
From the link I posted
At this point, even the deniers can no longer ignore the obvious: Britain is under sustained assault which is being launched from within its own Muslim community. It is this community that the terrorists move and live in and where they receive financial and logistical support. It is this community that gives them cover to carry out their murderous schemes. In short, the Muslim community is their haven and base of operation in their war against Britain.… There are some who think that we may already be beyond the point of being able to stop the Islamic takeover of much of Western Europe.…The world better pay attention, because this will be the fate of every country that allows large Muslim communities to form in its midst.… Britain is now paying the harrowing price for decades of mindlessly admitting large numbers of Muslim immigrants.
Reply to this
As an example, when this corrupt bunch were looking at the latest round of hospital closures, they had their "Hot List", whereby they were looking at the electoral effects of hospital closures and deciding accordingly. So why not the same for migrant dispersal?
Re EUReferendum - this disturbs me, from the latest post but one:
"" Some Eurosceptics of course hope that the challenge of informing citizens and engaging citizens about and in such a complex issue as a treaty can be turned into a weapon that can kill further European integration. But I do not think we should allow that. "" (The fragrant Margot Wallstrom [ by God I'd like to be horizontally familiar with that one!])
" But I do not think we should allow that." Who the hell do these arrogant people think they are. A Swede (no offence to Swedes meant - but you'd feel the same if it was reversed) having the gall to say what she will and will not ALLOW the British, and others, to do. Allow? Allow? I resent that sort of attitude even from my own politicians.
She really does think they've got it all stitched up, don't they.
Reply to this
SHM posted: (The fragrant Margot Wallstrom [ by God I'd like to be horizontally familiar with that one!])
Take care - she is a politician. You may find a few articles missing.
I'm glad that she thinks that. Also I was amused by the slip that Caeser/Emperor Barroso made, declaring prematurely, the formation of the unHoly Euro-Romano empire.
Far from pax Europia on the continent, this combination of European empire builders and the Islamic invasion, is leading us to war that is going to be decidedly unHOLY. Either one of these, historically, has been sufficient reason to ignite a war in Europe. Now we have two.
God preserve us.
Reply to this
And all Muslims should go to Britain and ask what the Germans are like.
They dont say anything but quietly go about organising. Organising, organising - with German efficiency, no compassion and no fairness, and no sense of humour.
Reply to this
Ah yes - found the reply.
Yes. Brilliant. Perfect reply.
I suppose it could be said that the British and the Germans deserve each other and complement each other. I've always liked our cousins across the rhine.
Organising, organising ...
Reply to this
najistani
I agree with you all the way.
But in the end there is only one solution, and now, even a Muslim writer also thinks the same.
For any non-muslim culture or civilisation to survive, it must not allow any significant presence of Muslims within it - preferably zero.
If through absentmindedness, ignorance or folly, one has let them in, then self-preservation requires that they be removed as humanely as possible.
This needs to be done for the sake of humanity if nothing else, for the Western way of war for survival is very very unpleasant for all, especially the enemy.
I beg all Muslims to leave the West before the Western survival instinct raises its head. It has been lying dormant for a while, but tremours are being felt.
Reply to this
From http://fortressaustralia.blogspot.com/2007/07/defending-our-western-civilzation.html
"There are large numbers of non-Muslims who actively encourage, support, and promote Islam ..."
Yes, the existence of a huge fifth column of apologists and seditionists (either consciously or unwittingly) in the western nations is a huge obstacle to defending our civilization.
Therefore, proper education in the West is critical, and JW/DW is only the start of that pedagogical process.
The current academic establishment, whom I see as the biggest villains in this unfolding tragic play, have either been bought with Saudi money or else are ideologically committed to the deconstruction of--even the destruction of--the classical west.
Then there are the predominantly Christian groups who naively project their compromsing, tolerant, and ecumenical values falsely onto the Muslims, who absolutely hold no such values--Islam "must dominate and not be dominated."
Then, there are the blinkered multi-culturalists who see Islam as just another benign culture that should be welcomed into the fellowship of man, ignoring the fact that Islam is adamantly uni-cultural.
It recognizes fellowship only among Muslims. The "other," according to Islam, are "filth" in the eyes of Allah, to be converted, subjugated as dhimmi slaves, or slaughtered.
Finally, there are the Marxist utopians, who see the Muslims as just another group of economically downtrodden humans, natural allies in the eternal fight against capitalist "exploitation." Nevermind that all the movers and shakers in the violent jihadist movement are middle or upper class ideologues.
Nevermind that these Muslim operatives are far more ruthless in their beliefs and attitudes that even the worst Stalinist, and completely willing to exterminate their allies of convenience once the larger battle against the Great Satan is won.
The first step at home, as has been stated here many times, is communicating--properly and truthfully--that Islam is not primarily a religion, but rather a fascist, supremacist cult of death, whose clear doctrinal and practical purpose is a perpetual quest for absolute world-wide political control.
Once we as a society recognize Islam for what it is, and are not afraid to openly so state, then men of good will, from all political and religious dispositions, can unite against this vicious tyranny that threatens our hard won freedoms and that seeks, as its "holy mission," to utterly destroy every non-Islamic culture as so much "jahaliyya."
Reply to this
najistani
I agree with you all the way.
But in the end there is only one solution, and now, even a Muslim writer also thinks the same.
For any non-muslim culture or civilisation to survive, it must not allow any significant presence of Muslims within it - preferably zero.
If through absentmindedness, ignorance or folly, one has let them in, then self-preservation requires that they be removed as humanely as possible.
This needs to be done for the sake of humanity if nothing else, for the Western way of war for survival is very very unpleasant for all, especially the enemy.
I beg all Muslims to leave the West before the Western survival instinct raises its head. It has been lying dormant for a while, but tremours are being felt.
----------------------------
The reply is now in the right place.
Reply to this
All muslims should go speak to Germans about what the British are like. We are very very slow to anger, but once we do reach that point then we become absolutely pitiless.
I suggest they start with some of the older residents of, say, Hamburg, or Dresden.
We might get angered to the point where we wont let them leave ... this is something Muslims should factor into their thinking. Best they just all start leaving now, of their own volition.
Reply to this