DUTCH LAWMAKER WANTS BURQA WEARING WOMEN JAILED

Wilders presents anti-burqa bill

12 July 2007

THE HAGUE (AP) - A right-wing Dutch lawmaker wants women jailed for wearing the head-to-toe Islamic robe known as a burqa, calling it a ''symbol of oppression.''

Geert Wilders, whose Freedom Party has nine lawmakers in the 150-seat lower house of Dutch parliament, filed a proposed law change Thursday that would make wearing a burqa in public a crime punishable by up to 12 days jail.

''The burqa and niqab are a symbol of oppression of women,'' Wilders told The Associated Press in a telephone interview. He said burqas and the niqab - a full-faced veil with only a slit for the eyes - hindered integration of Muslim women into Dutch society and also were a security risk.   (yep - burqas make great disguises for those manly jihadists fleeing the law)

''If you want to wear a burqa, you should do it somewhere other than the Netherlands,'' Wilders added.

A prominent spokesman for the Dutch Islamic community, Ayhan Tonca, called Wilders' proposal ''totally out of proportion'' and accused Wilders of seeking to broaden a rift between Muslims and the rest of Dutch society.

Last November, the Dutch government said it was drawing up legislation to ban burqas, but that administration was defeated in elections the same month and the new centrist coalition of Prime Minister Jan Peter Balkenende has no plans to implement a burqa ban, meaning Wilders' proposal has little chance of becoming law.

However, because Wilders has submitted the proposal, it will have to be debated in Parliament and could help solidify his support among right-wing voters. He said he expected that to happen by the end of the year.

Only a handful of women wear the burqa in the Netherlands, but the debate over whether to outlaw it underscores a drift away from traditional Dutch tolerance and unease with the growing influence of Islam in the country.  (the "growing influence" is worldwide & is called Global Caliphate)

About 6 percent of the Dutch population of 16 million is Muslim and Wilders accuses many Muslims of failing to integrate.

He said that a burqa ban would help women who wear the robe to find work and make Dutch friends. ''Nobody is going to employ somebody wearing a burqa,'' he added.   (of course in the UK these burqa babes SUE to continue to wear their bee keepers outfits)

Wilders is well-known for his anti-Islam outbursts and is constantly under protection from Dutch security.

During last year's election campaign, he warned that the Netherlands was threatened by a ''tsunami'' of radical Islam and said Muslims should tear up half of the Quran if they wish to belong to Dutch society. (GREAT IDEA!!!!!!!! as the two cannot coexist)

Security and intelligence services have warned Wilders that his comments risk fanning anti-Dutch sentiment in Islamic countries, but he refuses to rein in his rhetoric.

''This is not a law for Saudi Arabia, this is a law for the Netherlands,'' he said. ''I couldn't care less what people in the Middle East think about it.'' ( HALLELUIAH!!!!!!!)

Muslim spokesman Tonca accused Wilders of attacking his faith. ''He is just involved in anti-Islamic politics,'' he said.

''This is totally out of proportion,'' Tonca added. ''He is taking on a problem that is not a problem, There are only a few people in the Netherlands who wear the burqa.'' (Just wait a year or two - the Netherlands will be swarming with women in burqas - just like Londonistan)

[Copyright AP 2007]

Subject: Dutch new

MAYBE THE DUTCH WILL BE THE FIRST TO HAVE THE COURAGE TO OPENLY OPPOSE THE ISLAMIFICATION OF EUROPE - LET'S HOPE SO BECAUSE IT SURE AS HELL DOESN'T LOOK TO BE HAPPENING IN DHIMMI BROWN'S UK.

 

What did you think of this article?




Trackbacks
  • No trackbacks exist for this post.
Comments

  • 14 Jul 2007, 2:32 PM Red Rose wrote:
    Brilliant! At last, a politician with GUTS. Europe and UK desperately need politicians of his calibre. Geert Wilders of the Freedom Party - I salute you.
    Reply to this
    1. 14 Jul 2007, 9:04 PM DP111 wrote:
      Nothing compared to what a couple of Muslims are saying

      Mustapha Hammouche: "…The Western countries are currently reaping, in these terrorists, what they sowed when they flung their doors open wide to every malevolent fundamentalist and failed in putting in place a mechanism for managing and controlling immigration in an appropriate manner…

      "The West's generosity in allowing the organizations of political Islam to penetrate into Islamic societies [in Europe], spread among their youth, and enlist them in order to achieve their own ends and realize their agendas, was a mistake, and was the prelude that led to the appearance of these disastrous consequences now. He who sows the wind reaps the storm…

      "The forces of political Islam that were chased out of the East… have control over a wide swath of Islamic societies in Europe. Things that are forbidden and are lines that cannot be crossed in Arab countries, and lead to the one who says them… being [kicked out] way beyond the sun, are permitted here in the West: fiery sermons and takfiri pamphlets, meetings that openly discuss overturning governments and hanging the rulers, the conditions of carrying out the death penalty against an apostate, and imposing the jizya [poll-tax] on the dhimmis…

      AND Khudayr Taher: Europe and America Should Deport All Muslims - Including Myself

      Europe and America Should Deport All Muslims - Including Myself

      "Countries have the right to defend themselves and assure their citizens' safety from terrorism. Likewise, it is clear that the source of the terrorist crimes in Europe and America is the Muslims who live in these countries.

      "The security services cannot know people's intentions and sort out who is the noble immigrant and who is a terrorist criminal. [But] wherever there are Muslims, their presence has produced crimes of terrorism and murder.

      "Among those Muslims in Europe and America who do not practice terrorism, most of them do not have loyalty and sincere attachment to these countries that have offered them all of the means of life in dignity - housing, studies, work, and citizenship…

      "The legitimate question is this: Since the security services cannot sort out the good immigrant from the bad terrorist… why don't these countries deport all Muslims, of all races, from Europe and America, and [thus] find rest from the danger of terrorism, and protect their peoples?

      http://www.memri.org/bin/opener_latest.cgi?ID=SD165007

      ------------------------------------
      On "The Lord of the Rings" theme, would the kingdoms of men have alowed millions of Orcs to settle in Gondor? That is what we gave done in the name of diversity. Are terrorism, rapes and other criminal acts also to be counted in the "diversity" programme.

      Unrestricted immigration, particilarly of Muslims, is the single greatest strategic blunder the West has made in history.
      Reply to this
  • 14 Jul 2007, 2:35 PM urban11 wrote:
    jail all her male relatives also.
    2nd offence----- deportation back to the ummah
    Reply to this
  • 14 Jul 2007, 5:42 PM Yorkshireminer wrote:
    Wilder's certainly doesn't mince his word, in fact I think he would mince a few more thing if he got the chance. He has burnt his boats and it is a terrible thing to think that this fine man who lives just a few miles to the north of where I live will not be able to show his face in public because of all the death threats. Not to be able to walk freely in you own country is an reflection of the dimitute we are living under. He has had more than 600 death threats and he has to have an armed guard when he goes for a piss in the Dutch Houses of parliament. The next election should be very interesting there are about 9 political parties in parliament and it is impossible to get a majority for one party. All Governments are coalitions. The present coalition is between the Conservative party the Labour party and a small Calvinistic religious party. If he gets more than the 9 seats he has got now it will be very funny to see if the Dutch will even be able to form a Government at the next election. It took nearly 3 months to form this one. If he gets between 20 and 30 seats, and he has a good chance. He will be one of the largest parties in parliament. None will work with him or have him in a coalitions because more and more of the parties are dependent on the muslim vote and they wont want to alienate them. Under those conditions you will need somewhere in the region of 5 to 6 parties to form a coalition government, which will be so unstable it wont last very long.
    Reply to this
    1. 14 Jul 2007, 11:57 PM piggy infidel wrote:
      Yorkshireminer, thanks for that overview, I am always very interested in developments in Holland and Scandinavia as I suspect the kickback against Islam will start there first, given that with a smaller population, any demographic changes are more noticable and felt more keenly.

      Is the figure of 6 percent Muslims in Holland (overall) correct? I'm sure this is dwarfed by the numbers in Amsterdam , Rotterdam etc.

      Douglas Murray gave an excellent speech last year re. Muslims in Holland, it's on the Frontpage website (video section)
      Reply to this
      1. 15 Jul 2007, 1:50 AM Yorkshireminer wrote:
        Just a small point, well a big point really, the Nignog level is approaching 50% in the four largest cities in the Netherlands. In Amsterdam more non Dutch than Dutch are now born and Rotterdam will soon follow. Antwerp is up there with them, the Flemish Nationalist party reached the apogee of there followers in the last election. They gained about 33% of the votes but in the next election if they get the same % of the white vote the percentage will go down because of white flight and muslim immigration. I would like to remind you that Antwerp and Rotterdam are Europe's biggest ports especially Rotterdam and the connection via the Rhine to Germany and central Europe. Rotterdam is not only Nederland biggest port but Germany's and Switzerland's as well, with the new 3,000 ton barge canal from the Rhine to the Danube in Bavaria it is being used more and more by Hungary Austria and Czechoslovakia. Just a small thought to go to bed on where do you think the fighting will be if Europe disintegrates into Civil war. I will give you two guess one begins with a R and the other with an A
        Reply to this
    2. 15 Jul 2007, 12:30 PM DP111 wrote:
      Yorkshire miner

      Heard anything about this?

      Unbelievable as it may seem, the Dutch 'Minister voor Wonen, Wijken en Integratie' (Residence, Neighbourhoods and Integration (I'm not making this up)), Ella Vogelaar, today has declared in an interview that The Netherlands will be Islamic at some point in the future. She feels that The Netherlands should adapt to Islam, and subsidise Islamic institutions. What will emerge, according to her, is a "Christian-Jewish-Islamic culture". As if Christianity and Judaism aren't 100% opposite to Islam's teachings. The stupidity of the statement is mind boggling.

      http://dutchconcerns.blogspot.com/2007/07/bad-news-from-holland.html
      Reply to this
      1. 15 Jul 2007, 6:40 PM piggy infidel wrote:
        This is not bad news, it is good news, if these lunatic politicains are thinking along such suicidal lines, then it's far better they say it out loud and (inadvertantly) warn the Dutch electorate just what they have planned for them - all grist to the mill of Geert Wilders, one hopes
        Reply to this
  • 14 Jul 2007, 8:43 PM Sir HM wrote:
    Miner

    Thanks for that, it carried more info than you know.

    Whenever anyone reports on Wilders and his Party, they say he has nine seats in the 165 (maybe not exact, but about right) seat Parliament. Makes it look like it's trivial. But the way you explained it there ... it's not trivial is it.
    Reply to this
  • 14 Jul 2007, 9:20 PM DP111 wrote:
    gandalf

    The newly elected PM of the UK and GB has shown his true colurs.

    GORDON Brown’s politically correct onslaught intensifed last night as compulsory teaching of the life of Sir Winston Churchill was dropped.

    A new school curriculum, unveiled as part of the Prime Minister’s barrage of initiatives, also scrapped the mandatory study of dictators Adolf Hitler and Joseph Stalin. It was instantly branded “madness” by critics.

    Instead, secondary school pupils will be taught classes in global warming, healthy eating, Arabic and Urdu. And they will get five-minute “attention-grabbing” lessons in subjects like French and mental arithmetic following claims that today’s youngsters cannot concentrate for long.

    http://www.dailyexpress.co.uk/posts/view/13304
    Reply to this
  • 14 Jul 2007, 10:11 PM DP111 wrote:
    An al-Qaeda fanatic jailed for inciting murder online was caught making a website urging terror attacks - from his cell in Britain’s most secure prison.

    Tariq Al-Daour, 21, used a smuggled mobile phone and modem lead to access the internet on a laptop issued by the Prison Service to help him prepare his court case. The laptop was seized after a violent struggle when prison officers suspected he was misusing it and the hate-filled website called Global Jihad was found.


    http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/topstories/tm_headline=exclusive-terror-cell&method=full&objectid=19453764&siteid=89520-name_page.html

    First, like all of the MSM, it believes that all this terrorosm is al Qaeda inspired. It is not. It is inspired by the Koran and the life of mohammed, which every Muslim must try and emulate.

    The MSM must know this by now. The reason why the MSM does this, is to deflect antagonism from Muslims to a know terror group. This will lead us to the death of civilisation.
    Reply to this
  • 14 Jul 2007, 10:37 PM piggy infidel wrote:
    Wilders .... ''This is not a law for Saudi Arabia, this is a law for the Netherlands,'' he said. ''I couldn't care less what people in the Middle East think about it.''

    This bloke will go down in history as one of the few politicians with real integrity who spoke out bravely in the face of Muslim fascism, aided and abetted by our craven media.

    If anyone hasn't seen it before, he did an interview with the the BBC a couple of years ago - well worth watching.

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/newsa/n5ctrl/progs/06/hardtalk/wilders22mar.ram
    Reply to this
    1. 15 Jul 2007, 11:30 AM DP111 wrote:
      piggy infidel

      Thanks for the link.

      Steven Sackur is a typical ignorant BBC journalist. His idea of Europe, just as all of BBC, is summed up by "tolerance of and for all". Thats it. Such views extended ad infinitum, leads to totalitarianism. In the prsent case, Islamic totalitarianism, which is worse then the Nazi and Communist types combined. The reason for this is that Islamic totalitarianism is a religion, while the other two are atleast subject to some reason ie part of the Western mode of thought. And because of this, both failed. The same is just not true for Islamic totalitarianism. In addition, Islamic totalitarianism demands adherence, on pain of death, to practices that make the other two totalitarianisms look quite liberal by comparison.
      Reply to this
  • 14 Jul 2007, 11:08 PM Sir HM wrote:
    Thanks for that link, Piggy.

    So that's Steven Sackur eh (the interviewer). I knew the name - but as I don't have a telly, I didn't know the face. I do now, and he's definitely on my shit-list. He gave Wilders a really hard time - or he tried to - and he was personally involved in it. It wasn't just a professional hard interview.
    Reply to this
  • 15 Jul 2007, 7:20 AM piggy infidel wrote:
    Off topic but WELL WORTH LISTENING TO ....

    Very interesting "blog radio" program featuring Lionheart, a UK blogger from Luton, talking honestly about the muted and cowed response after the attempted London / Glasgow bombings and the Muslim takeover of Lutonistan

    This is hosted from the USA, is there anything similar here in the UK ????

    http://www.blogtalkradio.com/hostpage.aspx?show_id=32853
    Reply to this
  • 15 Jul 2007, 8:59 AM najistani wrote:
    The word is getting through - here's a new slant on the recent RoP spin-doctoring.

    From http://www.jihadwatch.org/dhimmiwatch/archives/017380.php

    "The survey found that young people are the group most likely to see Islam as a violent religion.

    Nearly 28 percent of 18-24 year olds believe Islam is fundamentally a religion of war which sits uneasily with modern Western culture compared with 17 percent of the overall population and only 13 percent of those aged 65.

    Less than half of all 18-24 year olds (48%) see Islam as a religion of peace, compared with 60 percent or over for every other age group, the poll found.

    "The trend that will alarm the Government and community groups most is that young people, who are generally more positive about spirituality, are so much more negative about Islam than the population as a whole," said Woolley."

    Is this because young people are more likely to get their news and opinions from the internet than from the MSM?

    Keep on Blogging!!!
    Reply to this
  • 13 Aug 2007, 3:52 PM paulus wrote:
    The Dutch invented the policy of multi-culturalism. They wanted to encourage immigration to fill a gap in the labour force and it was mainly Turkish Muslims who came. They expected them to return in time. But there was a problem: what about their children how could they be expected to go home if they had a Dutch education? So parallel education and spiritual support structures were established to provide cultural grounding for the kids when they returned to their native lands. However the immigrant communities stayed and multi-culturalism ensured that they failed to integrate. Now that there is tension between the Muslim world and the West Muslim women are using traditional dress, which they had previously abandoned, as a badge of belonging. The Dutch government needs to be more sensitive in their response or the tensions will escalate.

    http://www.thinkhard.org/2007/08/should-burkas-b.html
    Reply to this
Leave a comment

 Name

 Email (will not be published)

 Website

Your comment is 0 characters limited to 3000 characters.