>
>
CLOSE ALL MOSQUES--SAYS ITALIAN POLITICIAN
ROME, July 22 (Reuters) - A Moroccan imam arrested in Italy and suspected of running a "terrorism school" in his mosque had a variety of toxic chemicals at his home which could have been used to make explosives, police said on Sunday.
Roberto Calderoli, an opposition member of Italy's upper house for the anti-immigration Northern League, said all Italy's mosques should be closed and allowed to reopen only after they had been checked for illegal activity.
"As we don't know where's the baby and where's the bathwater, the only thing to do is to close all the mosques and reopen them only after accurate inquiries and checks," he said. (Additional reporting by Massimiliano Di Giorgio)
.................................................................................................................................................
I wish we had a politician here in the UK strong enough to make the same statement but we do not have any such people in the Government.
In the Uk if an Islamic bomb plot or something similar is discovered instead of Mosques being closed the Government and Local Authorities give permission(in appeasement) for terror Muslim groups to build a bigger Mosque (ref Mega Mosque), madness, utter madness.
Jihad can be conducted in various ways. Now that even doctors who are Moslem, cannot be automatically discounted from the Jihadi mentality, how do we know that Moslem doctors are not conducting a Jihad within the NHS.
Hugh F:
A couple of posters in JW put this
Isn't there another, much more obvious thought that the case of the Jihad Doctors might prompt? How carefully, with what tender attention, might such "doctors" treat their non-Muslim pattentions? I'm not talking about potential serial killers, injecting something lethal into the veins of trusting young Vijay Kumar, aged 11, who is brought in by his parents, or Mrs. Goldstein who closed her fabric store after her husband died, or retired Wing Commander Archibald Coakley, M.B.E., whose grandson brought him in, because each represents a diffeent example of the enemy, the Infidel enemy that still inhabits England and seems to think the land is not for turning.
No, there are other ways. Deliberate inattention, offering a wrong diagnosis, treating with ineffective drugs, overlooking the latest literature, forgetting ways to ease their pain, treating them roughly as they undergo certain procedures, making them anxious and enjoying their anxiety and that of their families.
Farfetched? Why? If you take to heart what others among you have obviously taken to heart, and if this is indeed the permanent enemy, and if you are told you must not only never take them as friends, but regard them as Unbelievers who are obstinate obstacles to the triumph of Islam, large boulders blocking the path you have all your life been told to take, fi sabih Allah, wouldn't the stranger reaction be for those of us on the outside to dismiss such fears? Would it really make sense to call those who harbor them, or who point out why they are not necessarily far-fetched, objectionable, and not investigate the real possibilty not only of such behavior -- but of the potential liability of doctors' groups and hospitals if they do not investigate or worry sufficiently about such matters?
-----------------
or
Moslem doctors refusing to use anti-bacterial gel to wash their hands as it contains alcohol. Wouldnt that give rise to an increase in MRSE.
Just asking.
Reply to this
Now if only this politician's demand can be made EU policy. Then I would have some regard for the EU. As it is, it is the EU that is the major cause of the open borders policy, as regards Moslem immigration is concerned.
Reply to this
The way the Italians work, it should take them 50 years to carry out the checks!
Reply to this
Gandalf said:
"I wish we had a politician here in the UK strong enough to make the same statement but we do not have any such people in the Government."
Look what we've got instead:
From http://news.scotsman.com/scotland.cfm?id=1142652007
"ALEX Salmond has boosted the cause of radical Islam in Scotland in his response to the Glasgow Airport attack, a leading Scots academic on religious affairs has claimed.
In a fiercely controversial commentary, Tom Gallagher, the chair of Peace Studies at Bradford University, said that Salmond had courted "radical voices" in the Muslim community following the attempted bombings, lending them a false layer of legitimacy.
He also accuses Salmond of deliberately setting out to exploit the attack to win favour with Muslims in Scotland" ....
... and surprise, surprise, here's the response " Saeed has now accused Gallagher of Islamophobia, saying there was no basis for the academic's attack. He added: "What he is arguing is that everyone who believes in Islam needs to have some kind of witch-hunt placed over them."
England, Scotland, Wales, Ireland - they're all Dar al-Harb to the paedolaters.
The bombheads are playing 'Divide and rule'. If the Kufaars don't hang together, then they will most certainly hang separately.
Reply to this
Hugh F
Yes, Muslim doctors do have a deliberate policy of neglect of the Kufaar.
From http://www.mdda.org.uk/web/constitution.php
"The Muslim Doctors and Dentisits Association UK (M.D.D.A. UK)
1. Name
The name of the Association is Muslim Doctors and Dentists Association UK (the Association)
2. Objects and powers
2.1 The objects of the association shall be:-
2.1.1. To advance the Islamic religion in the practice of medicine in the United Kingdom
2.1.2. To advance medical education in relation to the doctrines, practices and traditions of the Islamic religion.
2.1.3. To promote research in various aspects of medical science and to disseminate and publish the useful results of such research.
2.1.4. To promote the preservation and protection of the good health of Muslims in the United Kingdom."
There is NOTHING about promoting the health of the Kufaars!!!
The MDDA have some explaining to do. Shouldn't this sort of discrimination be illegal?
What are we Kufaar taxpayers paying their salaries for?
How many Muslim Shipmans are there quietly going about their work in the NHS?
Kick the murderous malpracticing quacks out of the country !!!
Reply to this
For some strange reason the MDDA consitution is no longer accessible. But at the moment it is still cached by Google at http://64.233.169.104/search?q=cache:ucnIKQWXtFUJ:www.mdda.org.uk/web/constitution.php+mdda+constitution&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=1&gl=ca
Reply to this
http://danmark.wordpress.com/2007/07/15/immigration-costs-in-sweden-amount-to-almost-297-pc-of-the-public-budget-2001/
Immigration-costs in Sweden amount
to almost 29.7 p.c. of the public
budget (in 2001)
Dansk udgave
It is the largest expenditure on the public Swedish Budget, but you cannot find it. Associated professor Lars Jansson publiced the book ‘Mångfall eller Välfärd’ in 2002. Latest Jansson refers to the period The Economist from June 2003 that writes Sweden is tortured by big economic problems caused by the burdens of the tremendous immigration, and that Sweden is the poorest country in Scandinavia today.
In the preface of the book Jansson writes: “The Swedes cliam information of the price of immigration, and how it has been financed. The immigrants cause the biggest expenditure of the public budget. Every municipality ought to give the information about the price of immigration.” Jansson estimates the immigration cost of the Swedish state to $33 bill. And refers to that just $778 mio has been shown on the Swedish public budget.
Reply to this
There are over 1m muslims in Italy and over 500 Islamic centres. Seemingly Islam is not formally recognised by the Italian Govt. therefore does not qualify to benefit from a national "religion tax".
Reply to this