MORE APPEASEMENT FROM THE UK MEDIA

TV airing for Islam's story of Christ

There was no manger, Christ is not the Messiah, and the crucifixion never happened. A forthcoming ITV documentary will portray Jesus as Muslims see him.

With the Koran as a main source and drawing on interviews with scholars and historians, the Muslim Jesus explores how Islam honours Christ as a prophet but not as the son of God. According to the Koran the crucifixion was a divine illusion. Instead of dying on the cross, Jesus was rescued by angels and raised to heaven.

With the Koran as a main source and drawing on interviews with scholars and historians, the Muslim Jesus explores how Islam honours Christ as a prophet but not as the son of God. According to the Koran the crucifixion was a divine illusion. Instead of dying on the cross, Jesus was rescued by angels and raised to heaven.


The article goes on to say:

However, Patrick Sookhdeo, an Anglican canon and spokesman for the Barnabas Fund, which works with persecuted Christians, accused broadcasters of double standards. Mr Sookhdeo, who was born a Muslim and converted to Christianity in 1969, said: "How would the Muslim community respond if ITV made a programme challenging Muhammad as the last prophet?"


.......................................................................................................................................................................
Yet another step towards the Islamisation of the UK  aided and abetted by the UK media, I do declare that these people (the Media) will not rest until we are all bearded and  females are Burka clad.

Who decides to make and run thes programmes?, has anybody asked you if you want such a programme?

Of course if you ask a Muslim if there should be a programme that defames Christianity and lauds Islam they will all say yes.

Dr Sookhdeo is absolutely correct in what he says, sadly this event typifies the willingness of our media to fall on their swords in abject appeasement to the Muslims in the UK
 

 

What did you think of this article?




Trackbacks
  • No trackbacks exist for this post.
Comments

  • 18 Aug 2007, 4:53 PM TheOPINIONATOR wrote:
    Clearly this is another step towards Islam becoming the State (AND MEDIA) sanctioned religion of Great Britain. One only needs to count the numerous ways, just in the past few weeks, that moslems have infringed on our freedoms with their Sharia law and medieval traditions

    In the effort to provide equality there should be another programme that gives the "Christian" view of Mohammed/Islam----but don't hold your breath waiting for that to happen and even if it did the media would like find some Dhimmi like Bishop of Breda Tiny Muskens who feels that Europeans should henceforth call God Allah.
    http://www.nisnews.nl/public/150807_1.htm

    In fact, I imagine that research will find Saudi backed funds helped to pay and pave the way for this BLASPHEMY against Christianity.

    Will Christians take to the streets in angry mobs, create chaos and burn effigies, etc??

    Prince Charles has been repeatedly connected to the Islamification of the UK:
    "Is Prince Charles being groomed to become the Constantine of Islam in England?

    Prince Charles has come to America for an eight-day tour. His mission is to persuade W. Bush and the Americans of “the merits of Islam”. He has voiced private concerns over America’s "confrontational" approach to Muslim countries and its failure to appreciate "Islam's strengths". He thinks United States has been too intolerant of the religion.

    What is behind this interest in Islam? Why would the Prince of Wales become an ambassador of this Arabian religion?

    In a 1997 Middle East Quarterly article titled "Prince Charles of Arabia," Ronni L. Gordon and David M. Stillman looked at evidence that Britain’s Prince Charles might be a secret convert to Islam.

    This claim was put forward by no less a personage than the grand mufti of Cyprus: "Did you know that Prince Charles has converted to Islam. Yes, yes. He is a Muslim. I can't say more. But it happened in Turkey. Oh, yes, he converted all right. When you get home check on how often he travels to Turkey. You'll find that your future king is a Muslim."
    FOR MORE DETAILS:
    http://www.faithfreedom.org/oped/sina51103.htm

    Both the government and our law enforcement are in the clutches of political correctness and multicultural madness thus Britain can NO LONGER count on its government OR law enforcement to do the "right thing" for the British people.

    IT IS UP TO US!
    Reply to this
  • 18 Aug 2007, 6:17 PM Ashley wrote:
    The Muslim Jesus or Isa is not the one and the same as Jesus the son of God who came on earth some 635/50 years before the advent of Islam. Unless of course, they are trying to say that Christianity is false and Jesus embraced Islam some 635/50 years before its advent in the deserts of Arabia. Not even the son of God is capable of embracing an ideology retrospectively, that would defy all standards of logic, divine or otherwise. Certainly, the Muslim prophet Isa being a mere mortal, would have no chance of going back and forth in time. I seem to recall, reading somewhere in the bible that Jesus warned against false prophets!
    Reply to this
  • 18 Aug 2007, 6:36 PM Anonymous wrote:
    "Islam honours Christ as a prophet but not as the son of God. "

    Muslims are always telling us that "Allah has no sons".


    But according the earliest version of the unchangeable Koran, Allah did have three daughters - Lat, Uzza, and Manat - see http://www.bible.ca/islam/islam-allahs-daughters.htm and http://www.muslimhope.org/DaughtersOfAllah.htm .

    However Muslims do not like to be reminded of these other members of the Allah family, and are liable to throw tantrums and set fire to embassies if anyone mentions them.

    Also there must be at least one other deity in the Muslim pantheon. If Allah is the moon-maidens' dad, then who is their mum? There must be at least one Mrs Allah and possibly four (since Allah is a Muslim he can marry up to four Goddesses). Of course being a good muslim, Allah may be keeping his female relatives safely locked up. It would certainly look bad if Lat, Uzza, and Manat joined the rest of the virgins in the brothel and started screwing around with every charred and smoking adolescent who Mohammed's followers had managed to pimp for martyrdom.
    Reply to this
  • 18 Aug 2007, 8:11 PM Ben wrote:
    Turnabout is fair play. Why is our side passive on the ideological/propaganda front?

    Please join me in petitioning Mel Gibson to document Muhammad's recitation & brutality in a full length feature film.

    http://www.petitiononline.com/MGP05/petition.html
    Reply to this
  • 18 Aug 2007, 11:27 PM DP111 wrote:
    Now let us see if ITV, or any media broadcast the truth about Mohammed, that he mass murdered a totally harmless community of Jews, assassinated a female poet who was critical of him, beheaded captive prisoners, and took their wives for his harem and gave the others to his favoured soldiers, the children were forcibly converted to Islam, married a six year old etc. The entire British media and the government would have its collective tail firmly between its legs.
    Reply to this
    1. 18 Aug 2007, 11:49 PM Always On Watch wrote:
      Telling the truth about MTP would result in fatwas. Just look at how Muslims despise Robert Spencer!
      Reply to this
  • 18 Aug 2007, 11:42 PM DP111 wrote:
    And more

    BBC forced to removed 'bastard' slur about Jesus from its website

    The debate had descended into an argument about the merits of Christians, Jews and Muslims when a writer, known as 'colonelartist', posted: "Are you a christian? You do know that jesus had to hide all his short life he lived in those promised land because his tribesmen used to call him fatherless, ridiculed him for being a B-A-S-T-A-R-D...'

    He added: "Jesus...was also persecuted because the jews would never accept as their Messiah a person whose father was missing...'

    The comments were allowed to remain for a week despite complaints. But after The Mail on Sunday contacted senior BBC officials, they were deleted.

    Colonelartist is a regular contributor to the BBC site.

    He has also written: "The jews in much remembered concentration camps had even better qualitity of freedom that these palestinians have...'

    One website user wanted to see if BBC editors were allowing these offensive remarks to remain while blocking others. He wrote: "No one can surpass the Muslims for denial of their role in Terrorism and Suicide bombing." The remarks were almost immediately deleted.

    The BBC has also been criticised for allowing allegedly anti-Semitic posts from a contributor called "Iron Naz'.


    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=476267&in_page_id=1770

    It is fairly certain that it is Muslims who are peddling this on the BBC website, with the active connivance of the BBC. Most probably these Muslims are in the UK.
    Reply to this
  • 18 Aug 2007, 11:48 PM DP111 wrote:
    There is no hope for Britain unless we stop Muslim immigration, and then over time, reverse the flow of Muslims. Humane repatriation of all Muslims is the only answer.

    Muslims are only doing what they are required to do by their religion. It is not their fault, the fault lies with us for giving them the opportunity to do so from within.

    What is to be done with the Quislings of our own society, is a bit problematic.
    Reply to this
Leave a comment

 Name

 Email (will not be published)

 Website

Your comment is 0 characters limited to 3000 characters.