BRITISH HISTORY NEED DIVERSITY REWRITE - ACCORDING TO "EQUALITY" COMMISSIONER

FROM THE OPINIONATOR:

Trevor Phillips nuLabour water carrier, Tony's pal, race baiter, failed comedienne , head of the human rights and equality commission and newly self appointed historian thinks that centuries of British history needs a politically correct "diversity" rewrite.

Phillips thinks that British history is dominated by white people and needs to be more "inclusive". Phillips needs a reality check as British past IS dominated by white people because we have always been predominately a racially white nation thus non-whites have had a minimal if any effect on British history. Clearly this chosen inability to see this FACT is just another effort, by the multiculturists, to back up their blatant lies that Britain has always been a "nation of immigrants". Also by defiling our history it will give future generations of Great Britain less cohesiveness thus leaving us more open to:
EU loyalty ->muslim infiltration-> and inevitable dhimmification.

Take for instance the Spanish Armada - a historic sea battle victory for Queen Elizabeth I, Sir Francis Drake, & Lord Charles Howard of Effington who of course are all white British (GASP!). Well now Phillips wants our children to learn the new and revised British history where in this case it wasn't the British who outsmarted the Spanish - oh no no - according to NuLab Historian Phillips  "It was the Turks who saved us."  WOW! So the muslims saved England from the Spanish Armada? - that whopper must be part of the "tapestry" Phillips refers to below??!! Far be it for the multiculturalist and dhimmi Phillips to allow the truth and facts to get in the way of his fictionalised but "diverse" history rewrite. Perhaps someone needs to inform Phillips that this battle is not a "story"  but historical FACT.

Of course Phillips, along with the other haters of Western civilisation, wants to make sure that the white British
adults and especially the children suffer from perpetualised guilt over the slave trade - even if it occurred and ended centuries before any of us were born.

So you better hang onto your history books as they may soon become collectors items - Trevor Phillips has his pen poised ready to rewrite our proud British history into a compilation similar to Ali Baba and the book
One Thousand and One Nights.

Another assault on the white British people and attempt to minimise & obfuscate our heritage.

Entire article - emphasis mine:


British history 'needs rewrite'
By Brian Wheeler
Political reporter, BBC News, at the Labour conference

Flags waving at the Last Night of the Proms
British history should be rewritten to make it "more inclusive", says Trevor Phillips, the head of the new human rights and equality commission.

He said Muslims were also part of the national story and "sometimes we have to go back into the tapestry and insert some threads that were lost".

He quoted the example of the Spanish Armada, which was held up by the Turks at the request of Queen Elizabeth I.

"It was the Turks who saved us," Mr Phillips told a Labour fringe meeting.

Let's use our heritage to rewrite that story so it is truly inclusive... so we have an identity which binds us in the stormy times we are going to have in the next century
Trevor Phillips
Equality commission head

Mr Phillips said he had also been persuaded of the need for a written constitution, saying the UK needed to be "more explicit in our understanding about how we treat each other".

He said population changes and immigration were happening at unprecedented rate and there was "no going back".

So it was no longer enough to assume people would inherit the values which bound the country together.

Speaking at an event organised by The Smith Institute, the Heritage Lottery Fund and the Young Foundation, he said it was important that new arrivals learned English.

Must be 'native' and 'right for us'

But he also stressed the importance of celebrating Britain's "human rights culture" and said the government had to be more specific about what it meant to be British - rather than simply stressing values such as "freedom" which were universal.

"We have to have a more explicit set of understandings which we can all share about how we treat each other and we talk to each other and they have to be based on real values.

Computer generated image of the fleet preparing to take on the Spanish armada

"I think the prime minister is right to talk about values but I think what is important is not the abstract values. Freedom is shared by all sorts of people."

If there was a written constitution it would have to be "an expression which is native and right for us".

He also stressed the importance of a national story in forging a shared sense of identity.

"I think we have to rewrite, redevelop, our national story so that it is inclusive.

"And what I mean by that in practice is this: not that we have to re-write what we are but sometimes we have to go back into the tapestry and insert some threads that were lost."

'Stormy times'

He said the abolition of the slave trade, for example, could be retold as being part of the English radical tradition. Trevor Phillips

Trevor Phillips

"Part of the job of heritage is to cognitize - give physical existence - to that national story.

Let's rewrite that story, let's use our heritage to rewrite that story so it is truly inclusive
Trevor Phillips
Equality commission head

"And if there is a practical thing, I would say it is that we need to revisit some parts of that national heritage. to rewrite some parts of that national story to tell the whole story.

"When we talk about the Armada it's only now that we are beginning to realise that part of it is Muslims," Mr Phillips told the meeting.

"It was the Turks who saved us, because they held up Armada at the request of Elizabeth I.

"Now let's rewrite that story, let's use our heritage to rewrite that story so it is truly inclusive.

"That's the reason for this so we have an identity which brings us together, which binds us in the stormy times that we are going to have in the next century."

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/politics/7012698.stm

 del.icio.us  Stumbleupon  Technorati  Digg 

 

What did you think of this article?




Trackbacks
  • No trackbacks exist for this entry.
Comments

  • 25 Sep 2007, 10:53 PM Sir HM wrote:
    OT but:

    Send a message to a jailed terrorist in Belmarsh:

    http://mypetjawa.mu.nu/archives/189511.php

    Wonder if the station gets public - or lottery - funding?
    Reply to this
  • 25 Sep 2007, 10:58 PM Sir HM wrote:
    " He said population changes and immigration were happening at unprecedented rate and there was "no going back". "

    We'll see.
    Reply to this
  • 26 Sep 2007, 12:44 AM Anonymous wrote:
    'Rewriting of history'......where was it I heard that before?
    Reply to this
    1. 26 Sep 2007, 12:50 AM Anonymous wrote:
      Just remembered one - it was the guy in Orwell's 1984, his job was to rewrite history.
      And there are some more.....yes, the Communists did that..and some other ones too....funny pattern to the ones I can remember......I also like the very Orwellian bit when he says history should be rewritten but that this is not the rewriting of history......yes Trevor
      Reply to this
    2. 26 Sep 2007, 1:11 AM Anonymous wrote:
      "He who controls the present, controls the past. He who controls the past, controls the future." from Orwell
      Reply to this
  • 26 Sep 2007, 1:53 AM JEH wrote:
    Will the insanity ever end? Will we ever wake up out of this nightmare?
    Reply to this
  • 26 Sep 2007, 8:04 AM najistani wrote:
    Here's the REAL contribution of Islam to our history...

    "The Islamic terror began in ‘the terrible summer of 1625’ when North African corsair slave raiders invaded and devastated the southern coasts of England, and for a short while even raised the green battle standard of Islam over English territory that had engraved upon it the terrible promise “The gates of Paradise are under the shade of swords .” From the coast of Cornwall, Devon, Dorset and Southern Ireland the Islamic slave raiders murdered and stole away entire villages to be sold into slavery in the Islamic Empire of the East. "

    From http://majorityrights.com/index.php/weblog/comments/the_brainwashing_of_minds_in_the_multicultural_totalitarian_state/

    Those who forget the past are condemned to relive it. Prepare for the re-establishment of Muslim white slavery in the 21st century.
    Reply to this
  • 26 Sep 2007, 8:12 AM najistani wrote:
    MORE ON MUSLIM ENRICHMENT OF BRITISH HISTORY

    "North African pirates abducted and enslaved more than 1 million Europeans between 1530 and 1780 in a series of raids which depopulated coastal towns from Sicily to Cornwall, according to new research.
    Thousands of white Christians were seized every year to work as galley slaves, labourers and concubines for Muslim overlords in what is today Morocco, Tunisia, Algeria and Libya, it is claimed.

    Scholars have long known of the slave raids on Europe. But American historian Robert Davis has calculated that the total number captured - although small compared with the 12 million Africans shipped to the Americas in later years - was far higher than previously recognised.

    His new book, Christian Slaves, Muslim Masters: White Slavery in the Mediterranean, the Barbary Coast, and Italy, 1500-1800, concluded that 1 million to 1.25 million ended up in bondage.... "
    - http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,3604,1166720,00.html
    Reply to this
  • 26 Sep 2007, 8:20 AM najistani wrote:
    MORE ON MUSLIM ENRICHMENT OF BRITISH HISTORY

    North African pirates abducted and enslaved more than 1 million Europeans between 1530 and 1780 in a series of raids which depopulated coastal towns from Sicily to Cornwall, according to new research.
    Thousands of white Christians were seized every year to work as galley slaves, labourers and concubines for Muslim overlords in what is today Morocco, Tunisia, Algeria and Libya, it is claimed.

    Scholars have long known of the slave raids on Europe. But American historian Robert Davis has calculated that the total number captured - although small compared with the 12 million Africans shipped to the Americas in later years - was far higher than previously recognised.

    His new book, Christian Slaves, Muslim Masters: White Slavery in the Mediterranean, the Barbary Coast, and Italy, 1500-1800, concluded that 1 million to 1.25 million ended up in bondage.

    - http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,3604,1166720,00.html
    Reply to this
  • 26 Sep 2007, 8:21 AM fidothedog wrote:
    Phillips needs to get his facts right, sure the Ottomans and moslem raiders out for loot/salves were a pain in the arse.

    However the Ottomans had a sound kicking in the naval battle of Lepanto in 1571 and had on 30 ships left after that.

    Even by the time of the armada in 1588, Ottoman naval power had not recovered enough to threaten Spain and her interests.
    Reply to this
  • 26 Sep 2007, 8:32 AM najistani wrote:
    MORE VIBRANCY
    "North African pirates abducted and enslaved more than 1 million Europeans between 1530 and 1780 in a series of raids which depopulated coastal towns from Sicily to Cornwall, according to new research.
    Thousands of white Christians were seized every year to work as galley slaves, labourers and concubines for Muslim overlords in what is today Morocco, Tunisia, Algeria and Libya, it is claimed.

    Scholars have long known of the slave raids on Europe. But American historian Robert Davis has calculated that the total number captured - although small compared with the 12 million Africans shipped to the Americas in later years - was far higher than previously recognised.

    His new book, Christian Slaves, Muslim Masters: White Slavery in the Mediterranean, the Barbary Coast, and Italy, 1500-1800, concluded that 1 million to 1.25 million ended up in bondage. "

    - http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,3604,1166720,00.html
    Reply to this
  • 26 Sep 2007, 8:44 AM frakked wrote:
    this guy always manages to insult us.. give a minority an inch and it takes a light year!
    Reply to this
    1. 26 Sep 2007, 9:34 AM defender wrote:
      let the camels nose into the tent and the camel will follow
      Reply to this
  • 26 Sep 2007, 10:25 AM Anonymous wrote:
    Perhaps we should write some of the truth about current 'contributions' such as the rapes, murders, election fraud (and other fraud), TB, fracturing of society, raod traffic accidents,etc. Here is one of the 'enrichers' who recieved an Honour from the Queen, and got busted for poor food hygiene previously:
    http://www.theasiannews.co.uk/news/s/1017594_curry_queen_arrested

    Curry queen arrested
    Don Frame
    25/ 9/2007
    A BUSINESSWOMAN who is the driving force behind a hugely successful Manchester-based restaurant chain, has been arrested by police investigating the smuggling of illegral immigrants into the UK.

    Government race adviser Nighat Awan 52, one of the country's richest entrepreneurs who had close links with Cherie Blair, was interviewed by officers from Merseyside Police, on suspicion of conspiracy to facilitate illegal immigration, and has been bailed to be questioned again in November.

    But a spokesman for the charity fundraiser who lives in Hale Barnes, near Altrincham said today she strenuously denied doing anything wrong, and had voluntarily helped police with their enquiries.

    In February this year, her husband Rafique Awan 54, who started the Shere Khan restaurant chain in Rusholme, was arrested by officers involved in the same operation. He dismissed as 'rubbish', claims that he had been involved in an alleged illegal immigrants employment racket.

    The spokesman for Mrs Awan, who is understood to be en route home to the UK after a trip to Mecca, said today: "She is totally in the dark about why she has been questioned, and totally bewildered by it all. Far from being involved in anything illegal, she has worked for a long time in the past as a human rights charity worker.

    "Mrs Awan voluntarily assisted police with their enquiries and answered their questions. While she has no personal knowledge of the matters in question, in her role as chief executive of the Shere Khan Group she is happy to co-operate as far as possible."
    Early this year the Awan's Indian restaurant empire was targeted by police and their £4m mansion searched by officers who removed documents and computer equipment.

    It is understood that Mr Awan was in Pakistan at the time of the raid and arrangements were made for him to be interviewed on his return. Mrs Awan spoke to police at the time, but was not arrested.
    Reply to this
  • 26 Sep 2007, 11:37 AM George Orwell wrote:
    I told you that this would happen.
    Reply to this
  • 26 Sep 2007, 11:42 AM Enoch Powell wrote:
    They wouldn't listen to me either.
    Reply to this
  • 26 Sep 2007, 11:53 AM Anonymous wrote:
    More on white slavery. Was Madeline McCann abducted by a Muslim Paedophile ring?

    http://www.themidnightsun.org/?p=791#more-791
    Reply to this
  • 26 Sep 2007, 12:02 PM Sir HM wrote:
    Anonymous

    We all know what happened to Madeleine McCann - and abduction doesn't get a look in. But to get back on topic:

    From the BNP Homepage:

    [ ... ]

    "" Hundreds of history books have been written since the Elizabethan era about the dark days of the Spanish threat to England and no mention is made of the role of the Turks.

    Mr Phillips's view appears to be based on the work of historian Jerry Brotton. He argues that the Armada had been weakened before it even set sail because the Spanish had been forced to keep some ships in the Mediterranean to deal with the troublesome Turkish navy.

    No threat

    But Dr Simon Adams, co-author of England, Spain and the Grand Armada, said the Ottomans were not threatening Spain in the Mediterranean.

    He said: "The letter had been sent in 1584 or 1585 and although England might have hoped the Turks would cause the Spanish problems, nothing really happened.

    "The Turks were not really doing anything (against Spain) in 1588. They were busy in the Near East."

    Dr. Adams said the Armada failed because it was poorly planned and the English had an effective Navy helped by favourable weather.

    The Civitas think-tank, which has republished the authoritative history Our Island Story by Henrietta Elizabeth Marshall, said the claim is "fantasy".
    Robert Whelan, of Civitas, said: "Before we start weaving in stories about the Turks and the Armada, dreamt up by people with their own agenda, we should first ensure we get the basics right."

    Phillips needs to be reminded that he is an outsider and that he has no place in rewriting English, British and European history. £70 million a year can be diverted to Britain’s schools if the bloated CEHR was abolished and Phillips sacked. ""
    Reply to this
    1. 26 Sep 2007, 2:01 PM urban11 wrote:
      When did facts have anything to do with leftist thinking?
      Reply to this
  • 26 Sep 2007, 12:40 PM Anonymous wrote:
    "...the stormy times that we are going to have in the next century." says Trevor.
    And, Trevor, what exactly is going to cause these "stormy times"???
    Reply to this
  • 26 Sep 2007, 12:57 PM AJukDD wrote:
    I see it as an act of desperation on their part. They are desparate for anything to make Muslims look good for Britain, really sad isn't it, is that the best they could do?

    That some of the ancient worlds texts managed to come back to the West from Muslim controlled lands is often used to say nice Muslims, it would have been even nicer if those very same Muslims had not torched the libray in Alexandria so all we got back from lands that were Christian were small remnants. I am grateful for their incompetence in not being able to burn all of the ancient texts, that is what I think of Muslims Mr Philips.

    The Muslims get a good press for the developments in Italy, but that was Byzantium culture fleeing the destruction of their nation by Islam, who brought their knowledge to Italy, thanks guys.

    That the threat of a Muslim fleet kept some Spanish ships back in the Med, wow, that those very same Muslim ships were raiding Christian lands and killing infidels and I am supposed to be grateful for that, Mr Philips, get a brain and a life!!!
    Reply to this
  • 26 Sep 2007, 1:09 PM Anonymous wrote:
    http://www.pendletoday.co.uk/latest-north-west-news/Dentist39s-fees-39cheaper-for-patients.3231124.jp


    · Published Date: 26 September 2007
    · Source: Press Association
    · Location: The Press Association Newsdesk
    Dentist's fees 'cheaper for patients in Islamic dress'




    View Gallery
    A Greater Manchester dentist has admitted reducing treatment fees to encourage female patients to wear the Islamic headscarf.
    Dr Omer Butt, from Prestwich, told a disciplinary hearing he would ask Muslim women to cover up in observance of Islamic law before he treated them.

    But he denied refusing treatment to a nurse because she would not follow his rules.

    The nurse, known as Patient A, told the hearing on Monday she was left "humiliated and upset" when she went to Dr Butt's Unsworth Smile clinic in Bury in April 2005.

    The nurse, a non-practising Muslim, claimed Dr Butt told her she would have to find another dentist because she would not wear the headscarf.

    Dr Butt told the General Dental
    Council professional conduct committee that the Islamic ethos of his surgery was a "marketing tool".

    He said: "If they are prepared to wear the headscarf, I am willing to reduce the fee or completely waive the fee."

    Giving evidence in his defence, Dr Butt said he identified the woman as a Muslim because of her name, which has roots in Islam, then "politely" asked her to wear a headscarf.

    "I did request her to wear the headscarf. I said 'It would help me if you would wear a headscarf'. Her response was she looked at me with a smile and said 'Oh, that's strange'."

    He then quoted a saying of the prophet Mohammed: "Islam will come as a stranger."

    If found guilty of serious professional misconduct, Dr Butt could have his licence revoked. The hearing in central London is expected to finish on Wednesday.



    Copyright (c) Press Association Ltd. 2007, All Rights Reserved.
    Last Updated: 26 September 2007 10:02 AM
    Reply to this
  • 26 Sep 2007, 2:52 PM urban11 wrote:
    It would be great if the Turks could save us from Trevor Phillips
    Reply to this
  • 26 Sep 2007, 6:55 PM Ashley wrote:
    That is just what these psuedo intellectual Multicularists would love to do - rewrite history, they excel when it comes to things like that and they make a very good living out of the deception. Trevor Phillips should first try reading some history before trying to re-write it. Time for some fresh air!
    Reply to this
  • 26 Sep 2007, 8:08 PM R CROSS wrote:
    Just who exactly is this "us" and "we"?The water in guyana obviously produces severe mental illness which leads to dellusions that one can pontificate upon the facts of another countries history,as far as i am aware from my studies of the history of my country ,there has never existed a negro tribe in England,and this retards comments point to the fact that as a foreigner he has absolutely no idea of who the English are,or how they managed to achieve a civilised state that far exceeded anything that any negro is capable of,and if the "we" is true then you must also accept your portion of the crime of enslaving negroes, colonialism,and all else that you never cease to blame us for,try as you might,you will always be black trev, live with it.
    Reply to this
    1. 26 Sep 2007, 11:03 PM gandalf wrote:
      Many years ago I was in Guyana and I saw trevor phillips on Guyanese TV, you must remember that Guyana was then very much third world, it still is as a matter of fact however \mr Phillips was reporting on a new caravan that had opened up to sell chicken and the main thrust of his report was the new rubbish bin that had been provided, so it would appear that he was talking rubbish then as he is now.. no change
      Reply to this
  • 26 Sep 2007, 9:45 PM China Girl wrote:
    What about us Chinese?
    Will Trevor write us a leading role in all the stories too? We are feeling a bit left out at the moment, it's all about the muslims and always the blacks - what about us?
    Trevor, if you are reading this could you say that my dad won the Battle of Waterloo, please? Or something else but something really good.
    Thanks Trevor.
    Reply to this
    1. 26 Sep 2007, 11:10 PM gandalf wrote:
      Hi Chinagirl and welcome,I am sure he will find some way of incorporating something he is very inventive that way if my guess is right it will probably be along the lines of Muslims building the great wall of China
      Reply to this
      1. 26 Sep 2007, 11:39 PM China Girl wrote:
        Hi Gandalf!
        If Trevor says they did then they did.
        The truth is no defence, so please do not argue with Trevor.
        If Trevor is still reading this then may I lodge a request for him to rewrite history to say that my Grand dad was the King, please? Cause then I'd be royalty.
        Thanks Trevor.
        Reply to this
  • 26 Sep 2007, 9:49 PM DP111 wrote:
    Queen Elizabeth was concerned about the future of Christendom if the Turks had been successful in their seige of Malta.

    The abolition of slavery was not in the "radical" tradition but was part of the Christian tradition.

    What an idiot. Is he still here?
    Reply to this
  • 26 Sep 2007, 10:13 PM DP111 wrote:
    Tevor Philips, " Let's use our heritage to rewrite that story so it is truly inclusive... so we have an identity which binds us in the stormy times we are going to have in the next century.


    So let us all lie, and then teach the lies as history in schools.

    But in his defence, he recognises that their will be stormy times in the next century - code for civil war, and implicitly recognises that it will be the Muslims who will be the cause.

    The peril that the future of the UK has been put in, lies squarely at the feet of all three political parties - they have put the very existence of Britain as a historic identity, at risk.

    What I see is civil war, and then the partition of the UK along non-Muslim and Muslim lines. A similar situation will exist throughout Western Europe. Muslims around the world, and specially those in Europe will rally across the national boundaries, while we are constrained by those boundaries.

    Stormy times my foot. We are looking at a civil war, a global or pan-European civil war, nothing less.
    Reply to this
  • 26 Sep 2007, 10:31 PM DP111 wrote:
    Elizabeth I and the seige of Malta by the Turks.

    EUROPE CELEBRATES

    In one of the greatest examples of courage and endurance the world has ever witnessed, the Knights of St. John prevailed.

    Only 250 knights survived at Malta, and almost every one of them was wounded, maimed or crippled. Europe, however, was now free of the Muslim threat that had appeared so invincible.

    In England, Queen Elizabeth I acknowledged that if Malta had fallen to the Turks, England itself would probably have fallen to the Muslims. She ordered the Archbishop of Canterbury to appoint a special form of thanksgiving to be read in every church in the land each day for three weeks. The rest of Europe also celebrated, paying their respects and acknowledging their debt to the Order that had long before been written off as having no real value.


    http://www.malteseculturemovement.com/?p=2

    Does this sound like QEI would ever be grateful to the Turks. She was a great leader, and recognised that whatever rivalry Britain had with Spain, was within the greater family of Christendom, and peanuts compared to the threat that Islam posed to Christendom.

    It is this kind of hogwash that NuLabour peddles. Having destroyed education in Britain, they feel the cup is now empty, and can be filled with re-writes of history.

    Google "Seige of Malta + Queen Elizabeth I" for more links.
    Reply to this
  • 26 Sep 2007, 10:33 PM DP111 wrote:
    PS

    It is worth noting that the majority of the soldiers who defended Malta in the siege were Spanish.
    Reply to this
    1. 26 Sep 2007, 10:46 PM DP111 wrote:
      PS

      It is worth noting that the majority of the soldiers who defended Malta in the siege were Spanish.

      So in QEI's own words, without Spanish the soldier's fierce resistance to the Turks, England would have fallen to Islam. Then we can forget about the Enlightenment, the birth of the science and Industrial revolutions, painting music etc that thses revolutions in thought brought about.

      Trevor Phillips is trying to ease the sitaution with Muslims in Britain, but he should not be doing so by a false interpretation of history. It is not just wrong but ethically and morally despicable.
      Reply to this
  • 26 Sep 2007, 10:59 PM Sir HM wrote:
    "" What I see is civil war, and then the partition of the UK along non-Muslim and Muslim lines. ""

    DP - we wont accept that ... it will be to the bitter end for one side or the other.

    Yes, I'm aware of what that sounds like, but it's the way it will be. And it will include those large parts of the elite groups that permitted it to come to this pass.
    Reply to this
    1. 27 Sep 2007, 12:03 PM DP111 wrote:
      Thats right. There can be no accomodation with Islam. In the final analysis, when push comes to shove, Muslims will have to leave Britain, and the West. There is no other way - Muslims will themselves make that impossible.

      It is better if they leave now, with their possessions, and the money that they have been able to make here in the West, then to have to leave dispossesed and in a hurry.

      God help us.
      Reply to this
      1. 27 Sep 2007, 1:19 PM Sir HM wrote:
        I'm not a believer myself, but yes, God help us all.
        Reply to this
        1. 27 Sep 2007, 7:15 PM DP111 wrote:
          I find the Trevor Phillips article hard to understand considering that he has been quite hard on Muslims over the last few years.

          I'm beginning to have suspicions that this is article is meant to provoke. Trevor P understands fully what will happen in the next century, when Muslims are virtually in the majority (note he is quite accurate in time scale of things). He is provoking us all, by asking us to re-write history to accomodate Muslims.

          Note the heated response his article has had, even with me, and it gives some credence to that suspicion.

          Meanwhile, the Daily Mail and Express continue to highlight the problems we have with Islam.

          ----------------------------

          Have you read The Great Siege by Ernle Bradford. Highly recommended.

          I did not know that the Knights of St John, were under oath never to fight fellow Christians. They were under oath though, to protect Christians from the "love, mercy and compassion" of Jihadis. It was this steadfastness never to fight against fellow Christians that made them so unpopular with Christian rulers in Europe, who were fighting each other, while ignoring the real threat from Muslims.
          Reply to this
  • 26 Sep 2007, 11:34 PM Anonymous wrote:
    Something Trevor was partly responsible for earlier:

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=448298&in_page_id=1770

    One of the country's most senior policemen has admitted his force is recruiting unsuitable officers in its drive to be politically correct.
    Dyslexics, the physically disabled and those with religious beliefs which affect their work are apparently being given jobs - even though they are unable to fulfil their role.
    Steve Roberts, a deputy assistant commissioner at Scotland Yard, said there was a 'whole cohort' of inadequate officers coming into the London force because the force had 'shied away' from tackling the issue.
    His comments in the magazine Police Review follow a series of embarrassments for the Metropolitan Police in recent months.
    PC Alexander Omar Basha, a Muslim officer, provoked a political storm last year when he was excused from guarding the Israeli embassy on 'moral grounds' after he expressed concerns over the bombing of Lebanon.
    Reply to this
  • 27 Sep 2007, 1:27 AM Mother Ecclesiastica wrote:
    I am all for the re-writing of British history...

    It has been viciously distorted over the passed forty-odd years to placate the peurile sensiblities of the Defeated and Backward people of the oddly-named Third World Countries!!

    All true Britons would do well to read books about Britons' History which were written and published PRIOR TO 1950 !!!

    Let the truth be RE-PUBLISHED!

    Trevor Phillips is obviously in Islam's Camp.

    Let The War Begin!
    I am ready, willing, and able.
    Reply to this
  • 27 Sep 2007, 7:25 AM Fred wrote:
    Just a thought, I wonder if Trevor Phillips would also consider looking at the positive aspects of the slave trade as it applies to him?

    For example;

    “If it were not for the slave trade I and millions like me would be starving in some African hell-hole, doing everything I could to get a place on a rowing boat heading to Britain. Instead, thanks to the slave trade I am enjoying the good life and getting well paid for giving the British hard time ”
    Reply to this
    1. 27 Sep 2007, 2:34 PM frakked wrote:
      it could actually be worse... the people of african ancestry now in the west could have been swept up in the middle eastern slave trade and not exist at all as male slaves tended to be neutered!
      Reply to this
      1. 27 Sep 2007, 3:08 PM Sir HM wrote:
        Of those taken across the Atlantic by white slave-traders, 90% survived.

        Of those taken across the Sahara or up the east African coast by Mohammedan slave-traders, 90% died.

        Who do the descendants of slaves take a poke at and want compensation from?

        White slave-traders took about 12 million across the Atlantic and into Europe. Mohammedan slave-traders took about 140 million their routes.

        And who do they take a poke at and want compensation from?

        The Mohammedans also took about 1.5 million Europeans as slaves just in the Barbary raids - ignoring the Ottoman take.

        And who are the bad guys and who never gets a mention?

        Slavery was banned in Oman in ... 1970, as soon as Qaboos came to power there (put in place by a British organised and executed coup). When was it banned here? 1832? America? 1865? Saudi Arabia? 1963? (and reputedly secretly still going on). Sudan? Still happening. Mauretania? Still happening.

        But who are the bad guys again?
        Reply to this
        1. 27 Sep 2007, 3:15 PM Sir HM wrote:
          PS And that's just what the Mohammedans took from Africa. Tens of millions more were taken from India. So many of them died en-route that the Indians called the route the Hindu Kush - Hindu Death.

          And who are the bad guys again?

          About time this ideology was pushed back under its rock. For ever. We really are going to have to do a full number on it so it'll never again dare poke its snout out from under that rock.
          Reply to this
          1. 27 Sep 2007, 8:39 PM Fred wrote:
            Thank you - I have often heard the Hindu Kush mentioned on the MSM but no one ever explained what it meant!
            Reply to this
  • 27 Sep 2007, 11:48 AM Anonymous wrote:
    A recent victim of Trevor's diversity:
    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=483408&in_page_id=1770
    Reply to this
  • 3 Dec 2007, 3:32 PM jrgkxekz wrote:
    zkmmeagt http://hvsubfbq.com nzshqidv zvmpannx ggwctnsw">http://ztrocnww.com">ggwctnsw [URL=http://xkajtftv.com]cnnijisi[/URL]
    Reply to this
  • 5 Jan 2008, 6:36 AM bdsbparx wrote:
    hxeyzawu http://ftbyiofm.com seqsahpm fryunnup pmbhtpvv">http://zzblglku.com">pmbhtpvv [URL=http://wrbqbftj.com]nmyxzzgf[/URL]
    Reply to this
  • 18 Jan 2008, 7:35 PM yikdkrsr wrote:
    ukgwbonp http://veznrqts.com vlhsahey yesajbwc
    Reply to this
  • 18 Feb 2008, 5:50 AM zzbnoehb wrote:
    kiqygnup">http://fqynteqi.com">kiqygnup [URL=http://ycrxsqta.com]guqsward[/URL] emolmjjo http://vhlkqnyf.com pegmnqfl xyhznylj
    Reply to this
  • 20 Feb 2008, 8:29 PM hfjrggfh wrote:
    [URL=http://ecwcmxqx.com]rudddlrz[/URL] spdpwxnc">http://dnvwikyr.com">spdpwxnc rhmekcvf http://rlihkdje.com vsgughkk wxeohung
    Reply to this
  • 20 Feb 2008, 8:41 PM uvrnqqlm wrote:
    [URL=http://trhsopsz.com]zzzmsezm[/URL] oaxwlmmt">http://owzyiroe.com">oaxwlmmt ixuzitxy http://rkqkklxk.com bgheqtfi eazisclj
    Reply to this
  • 5 Mar 2008, 12:22 PM jltukztr wrote:
    [URL=http://semsbbap.com]unbicbgv[/URL] hndyfepn">http://uyvkqsck.com">hndyfepn vfbgnbqs http://rexvicgl.com ccrbugmf xgpcruhg
    Reply to this
  • 26 Mar 2008, 3:59 PM tbynyead wrote:
    [URL=http://mryftjeg.com]dzdddizu[/URL] yabggvjo http://pohlqzae.com jujprhyi klobgqyi rkdfxkcx">http://yorsajtb.com">rkdfxkcx
    Reply to this
Leave a comment

 Enter the above security code (required)

 Name

 Email (will not be published)

 Website

Your comment is 0 characters limited to 3000 characters.