>
http://www.geertwilders.nl/
AUSTRALIA SLAMS DOOR ON AFRICAN IMMIGRANTS
Maybe Australians have been sickened and angered by the numbers of young girls and women who have genital mutliation forced upon them - secretly behind closed doors by the "pious" Sudanese - like the600,00- Sudanese, Somalian. Or that violent immigrants coming from primarily muslim Sudan and other war torn countries bring their murderous ways with them into Western countries offering asylum or immigration causing large jumps in violent crimes wherever they relocate.
No wasting of taxpayers dollars on throngs of pandering and futile programmes that literally do nothing but create jobs for inept bureaucrats- often putting unqualified or unsuitable minorities into positions that they achieved by the mere fact that they are a minority-so that another bureaucrat can tout NuLabour immigration "success".
Perhaps the Australian government has observed what our own nuLabour government refuses to admit - even when there is an Lefty Think Tank report stating what everyone else in the UK already sees and lives on a daily basis = that Immigration is a DRAIN on Britain.
PLEASE SEE ADDITIONAL COMMENTS BELOW ARTICLE:
Full article - emphasis mine:
THE Howard Government yesterday slammed the door shut on refugees from Africa.
Immigration Minister Kevin Andrews said no more Africans would be allowed into Australia under the humanitarian refugee program until at least July next year.
And he said there were no guarantees any Africans would be accepted in the next intake.
Announcing a move critics slammed as simplistic and inhumane, Mr Andrews said the program's quota for Africans had already been filled.
"We won't be considering any new applications until June or July next year," Mr Andrews said.
Australia has already accepted or is processing about 3900 Africans this year - 30 per cent of the total humanitarian refugee intake.
This quota was cut from 50 per cent in 2005-06 and 70 per cent in 2004-05, due to what Mr Andrews said were concerns about Africans' ability to integrate.
"Whether we leave it at 30 per cent or take it up or down will depend very much on whether we are having success in terms of their integration into the broader community, and what other humanitarian refugee needs there are around the world," he said.
Africans are being replaced in the program by Iraqi refugees from camps in Syria and Jordan and Burmese awaiting resettlement in camps in Thailand.
Mr Andrews said Africans, particularly Sudanese, had experienced serious problems settling in Australia.
"They tend to have more problems and challenges associated with them. Their level of education, for example, is a lot lower than for any other group of refugees," he said.
"They've been in war-torn conflict for a decade, many of them. Many are young . . . and many have been living in refugee camps for decades.
"It doesn't make much sense to me to acknowledge you have a problem . . . but not actually slow down the rate of intake until you've dealt with it," he said.
Senior federal Labor MP Alan Griffin attacked the Government's move as "a simplistic approach".
"I think the real issue here is what's being done in terms of support services, and I think this government's been pretty ordinary when it comes to providing support services," Mr Griffin said.
"The nature of refugees is that there are almost always going to be issues," he said.
Ethnic Communities chairperson Phong Nguyen said it was wrong for the Government to turn its back on millions waiting in African refugee camps.
"It is simply inhumane for the Australian Government to close the door on these people based on perceptions that some African refugees are not integrating into the Australian community," he said.
The move follows a series of incidents involving refugees from war-torn Sudan.
Father-of-four Kuol Agang died after being punched to the ground just five months after migrating to Australia from Sudan with his young family.
The 28-year-old was bashed and left for death on a suburban street last year after taking offence at being pelted with an egg thrown from a car.
THEOPINIONATOR CONTINUED:
The above article reads like much needed sensible policy until the middle where it is stated:
"Africans are being replaced in the program by Iraqi refugees from camps in Syria and Jordan and Burmese awaiting resettlement in camps in Thailand."
The Aussies seem to be setting themselves up for yet another large muslim immigration - with both warring sects, Shia & Shite, being imported and likely to continue their religious war unless the radicals are somehow weeded out and left in muslimland. There also is a need to ensure that ALL muslims with Global Caliphate goals are left behind ------------- but then again that could eliminate all "good" muslims.
Nevertheless - a moratorium on immigrants from Africa (& elsewhere) - a bold step that is everybit as need in the UK and in Australia.
TheOP
That's a good post. It's examples we all need. For instance, when one European country finally grasps the nettle and repatriates all Mohammedans, the others will follow. Someone has to be the first to step outside the official elite consensus; that country will then act as a trigger to set the rest off, after much early huffing and puffing about 'Human Rights'.
On a different topic - you may want to put this up as a full post:
Origins ...
" During the 1973 Yom Kippur War, the Organization of Arab Petroleum Exporting Countries unleashed the oil weapon, embargoing critical oil exports to the United States and Western Europe as a strategy for compelling Israel to withdraw unconditionally from all territories occupied in the 1967 war.
The US rejected Arab demands, but the European Community (EC, later EU), more dependent on Arab oil than America, decided on a policy of outright appeasement. This led to a series of quasi-official meetings between European and Arab officials and experts that culminated in a meeting at the ministerial level in Paris on July 31, 1974. There, an agreement was reached to initiate the Euro-Arab Dialogue (EAD), an ongoing series of closed, high-level meetings between senior officials of the two sides which would enable the EC and the
Arab League to formulate a new understanding on economic, cultural, and diplomatic issues. An important EAD objective was the eventual replacement of the US by the French-led European Community as the dominant influence in the Middle East. Over time, the EAD would institute a number of long-term policy agreements that guaranteed the Europeans both an uninterrupted oil supply and lucrative export contracts with oil-rich Arab states. In return, the Europeans would facilitate international recognition of the PLO at a time when its charter called for Israel's destruction, and enable Arab religious, cultural, and intellectual institutions to achieve unprecedented influence in Europe.
The Arabs also pressured the EC to relax its immigration rules and permit a massive influx of Muslims into Europe. From its inception, every EAD meeting passed resolutions in support of Muslim immigration to Europe. ""
---------------
"" As its Muslim population increases, Europe faces a growing threat from Islamic radicals. According to Bassam Tibi, professor of Political Science at Germany's Göttingen University, himself a Muslim and an internationally recognized authority on Islamic extremism, "The goal of the Islamic fundamentalists is to abolish the Western, secular order and replace it with a new Islamic divine order....The goal of the Islamists is a new imperial, absolutist Islamic power." ""
-----------------
Reply to this
cont./
"" In the final analysis, Europe's new anti-Semitism is the result of a foreign policy rooted in European dependence on Arab oil. Some thirty years ago, in response to a temporary crisis, Europe's leaders made the fateful decision to appease the Arab League and open their gates to a population that includes elements which pose a serious threat not only to Jews but, as the Madrid and London bombings and last November's riots in France demonstrate, to all Europeans. ""
Read it all
http://reformjudaismmag.org/Articles/index.cfm?id=1113
Reply to this
SirHM
Thanks for the compliment and the additional information - another interesting article on a similar topic is:
http://atlanticreview.org/archives/153-The-US-Saudi-relationship-Oil-supply-at-the-expense-of-US-security-and-moral-values.html
I have been looking into the relationship between the Saudi use of oil to blackmail the EU but haven't found too much YET. (I wonder why) There's alot out there about muslims becoming a political force in EU:
http://www.brookings.edu/views/op-ed/fellows/taspinar20030301.htm
and Saudis using oil money to spread their Wahabbism into Western schools and universities:
http://www.campus-watch.org/article/id/2433
I'd like to get the time to gather up all of this research, into one post, but it would be an enormous task.
I'd also appreciate any additional ideas that you may have for future posts.
Cheers!
Reply to this