Yet again the Guardian has come up with another pro Islamic diatribe, this time the Journalist Amjal Masroor asks "why did Blair not become a Muslim considering the plaudits that he (Mr Blair) has laid at the feet of Islam.

Tony Blair has said many overtly favourable things about Islam we all know that, whether this was through ignorance and/or receiving poor advice or information regarding Islam we may never know, maybe when he publishes his Diaries we will find out.

Mr Blair however is not the reason why I refer to this article "Blair the Muslim" in the Telegraph, what concerns me is the way the article is written, I find it totally condescending and derisory to other Religions, cultures gives a twisted view of History to boot.

The author writes:

"His conversion to Catholicism would no doubt remind the Muslim world, especially the Arab world of the history of the Crusades. The blood of millions of people still stain the cobblestones of the Holy Land from the cold-blooded murders committed in the name of Christianity and was blessed by the then Papacy in Rome."

The author conveniently forgets that the  Crusades were in answer to and aimed at halting a 400 year bloodfest that Islam had inflicted on the then world, now this is not an inconspicuous part of History, the events are well chronicled but typical of Islam they only acknowledge the parts of History that suit them, they still deny the Holocaust.

The Author then goes on to say:

"Islam certainly stands for tolerance and demonstrates this by giving a special status to the Christians and Jews calling them people of the Book - Ahl al-Kitab. Christianity does not do the same. Blair reminded us that "the standard-bearers of tolerance in the early Middle Ages were far more likely to be found in Muslim lands than in Christian ones"

This is a prime piece of Taqiyya,  what exactly does he mean when he writes about the "special status of Christians and Jews"  we all know that Islam has to dominate or destroy any other form of lifestyle, the special status is dhimmitude and we all know that that is another word for slavery.

I find the attitude of this article quite offensive it is elitist and patronizing and in some areas factually wrong where the author refers to tolerance in the middle ages as quoted by Mr Blair all I need do is refer you to the Crusades and why they were fought

The Author also states that Islam led the world in arts and culture, this is not strictly true, the countries such as Persia and Mesopotamia did indeed give a great deal to this world but BEFORE the Mohammedans swarmed in and destroyed those civilizations,  then as the Mohammedans do they claimed all of the developments made in those now Islamic countries as Islamic.