ASIAN GANG BEATS ARMY CADET IN RACE HATE ATTACK

FROM THEOPINIONATOR:
Yes - your are right in noticing that this is just a little, insignificant article from Pendle Today. Not front page news in the Daily Mail or Telegraph. Not a lead story for BBC.

The reasons are obvious - the victim was not only white but an army cadet.  You know - one of those young men who spends his free time in worthwhile and responsible activitie. Rather than sitting around seething with hate and looking to cause trouble - like the dregs who racially abused and attacked, Gareth Rogers, with 3 thugs against 1.

My, my where is the Commission for Racial Equality? - Why are they not appalled and having a spokeman denounce race hate crimes against white people? 

Where is the local imam - condemning the racially motivated attack and demanding the muslim thugs apologize and make reparations to Mr. Rogers?

I guess that young Gareth - just doesn't fit the politically correct racial model and is not an example of the overly hyped and ultimately bogus Islamophobia.


entire article:


Gang arrested after attack on Army cadet



AN ARMY cadet was attacked as he collected sponsorship money.
Gareth Rogers was racially abused and pushed to the floor near the junction of Railway Street and Berkeley Street, Nelson, on Wednesday afternoon last week after collecting money due to him from a sponsored walk.

He hit his face on the pavement and sustained facial injuries, which required hospital treatment. He went home afterwards.

Three youths of Asian appearance aged 14 to 16 were arrested at the scene and a fourth was arrested the following day.

All four have been granted police bail until April 5th pending further inquiries.

The full article contains 106 words and appears in n/a newspaper.
Last Updated: 28 March 2008 9:35 AM

 

What did you think of this article?




Trackbacks
  • No trackbacks exist for this post.
Comments

  • 29 Mar 2008, 7:02 PM stan waters wrote:
    Another little insignificant item from the Pendle area.

    http://www.pendletoday.co.uk/nelsonnews/Mosque-plan-goahead-after-controversial.3925628.jp


    I would call it 'Sold down the river!'

    Stan
    Reply to this
    1. 29 Mar 2008, 9:13 PM TheOPINIONATOR wrote:
      Thanks for posting this link - I was actually going to attach it to the above blog - but I was already late for an appointment.

      The moral is:

      Race hate attack against a white British young man = YAWN

      Muslims need a Mosquetrocity = all the "greased wheels" turn to make it a reality.
      Reply to this
  • 29 Mar 2008, 8:14 PM defender wrote:
    It will be interesting to have opinions about this..
    Just found this comment on Jihad Watch, interesting and onimous
    When Muslim population remains around 1% of any given country they will be regarded as a peace-loving minority and not as a threat to anyone:
    United States -- Muslim 1.0%
    Australia -- Muslim 1.5%
    Canada -- Muslim 1.9%
    China -- Muslim 1%-2%
    Italy -- Muslim 1.5%
    Norway -- Muslim 1.8%

    At 2% and 3% they begin to proselytize from other ethnic minorities and disaffected groups with major recruiting from the jails and among street gangs:
    Denmark -- Muslim 2%
    Germany -- Muslim 3.7%
    United Kingdom -- Muslim 2.7%
    Spain -- Muslim 4%
    Thailand -- Muslim 4.6%

    From 5% on they exercise an inordinate influence in proportion to their percentage of the population.They will push for the introduction of halal (clean by Islamic standards) food, thereby securing food preparation jobs for Muslims. They will increase pressure on supermarket chains to feature it on their shelves -- along with threats for failure to comply. At this point, they will work to get the ruling government to allow them to rule themselves under Sharia, the Islamic Law.
    France -- Muslim 8%
    Philippines -- Muslim 5%
    Sweden -- Muslim 5%
    Switzerland -- Muslim 4.3%
    The Netherlands -- Muslim 5.5%
    Trinidad & Tobago -- Muslim 5.8%

    When Muslims reach 10% of the population, they will increase lawlessness as a means of complaint about their conditions (Paris -- car-burnings) . Any non-Muslim action that offends Islam will result in uprisings and threats (Amsterdam -- Mohammed cartoons).
    Guyana -- Muslim 10%
    India -- Muslim 13.4%
    Israel -- Muslim 16%
    Kenya -- Muslim 10%
    Russia -- Muslim 10-15%

    After reaching 20% expect hair-trigger rioting, jihad militia formations, sporadic killings and church and synagogue burning:
    Ethiopia -- Muslim 32.8%

    At 40% you will find widespread massacres, chronic terror attacks and ongoing militia warfare:
    Bosnia -- Muslim 40%
    Chad -- Muslim 53.1%
    Lebanon -- Muslim 59.7%

    From 60% you may expect unfettered persecution of non-believers and other religions, sporadic ethnic cleansing (genocide), use of Sharia Law as a weapon and Jizya, the tax placed on infidels:
    Albania -- Muslim 70%
    Malaysia -- Muslim 60.4%
    Qatar -- Muslim 77.5%
    Sudan -- Muslim 70%

    After 80% expect State run ethnic cleansing and genocide:
    Bangladesh -- Muslim 83%
    Egypt -- Muslim 90%
    Gaza -- Muslim 98.7%
    Indonesia -- Muslim 86.1%
    Iran -- Muslim 98%
    Iraq -- Muslim 97%
    Jordan -- Muslim 92%
    Morocco -- Muslim 98.7%
    Pakistan -- Muslim 97%
    Palestine -- Muslim 99%
    Syria -- Muslim 90%
    Tajikistan -- Muslim 90%
    Turkey -- Muslim 99.8%

    100% will usher in the peace of "Dar-es-Salaam" -- the Islamic House of Peace -- there's supposed to be peace because everybody is a Muslim:
    Afghanistan -- Muslim 100%
    Saudi Arabia -- Muslim 100%
    Somalia -- Muslim 100%
    Yemen -- Muslim 99.9%
    Reply to this
    1. 29 Mar 2008, 9:23 PM TheOPINIONATOR wrote:
      It would appear that muslims in the UK (as I prefer to call them - as opposed to "British muslims" since there is nothing British about them)are on the fast track and currently hover between 5 and 10% behaviours - with the recent attacks on churchs and vicars - the percentage/behaviours/actions could be even higher - 10%++

      Perhaps this is the case as our government has laid out the red carpet for muslims and facilitated the fullfillment of their every whim. There can be NO doubt that muslims are pandered to by NuLabour, our schools, politicians, civic/racial groups, etc.

      Thus, a smaller number of muslims - percentage wise of the general population - has been able to exhibit the behaviours and use the tactics of a much larger muslim presence.
      Reply to this
      1. 29 Mar 2008, 10:33 PM defender wrote:
        The percentage may be right, our elites though has given them bonus points as in allowing them dhimmification on a plate thereby artifically increasing their influence. Kinda like a handicap system. Probably in return for the billions in muslim petrodollars which has thus far propped up our economy. Problem is we cant pay it back and its all hush hush.
        Reply to this
  • 31 Mar 2008, 12:03 PM Mother Ecclesiastica wrote:
    Stupid Mohatmetans to gang up on an Army Cadet.

    I feel very sorry for Gareth Rogers and I bet the unprovoked attack will only strengthen the resolve of many more of our Service men and women to make sure justice is served, and that even more thousands of them will be waiting for the right moment to overthrow the Government of the day and fight tooth and nail to restore the democracy and freedom to live peacefully in our own country again.
    *****

    Those statistics for Jihad strategies seem pretty alarming at first glance. I know they are accurate. Thing is that's just the Ayatollahs' take on the Jihad. Hitler, Mussolini, Stalin, and Hirohito plus sundry other shonkies, had similar dreams of grandeur, too.

    They were all defeated.

    Israel has managed to hold her own for the passed 60 years despite her putrid neighbours' constant bleatings of "IT'S NOT FAIR. WE'RE BEING PERSECUTED!"

    The Mohametans have had an over-indulgence from us, the decent countries, now for over 60 years. They have had trillions of dollars given to them to 'improve' their backward lot.

    They have merely proven that they are incorrigible. And ugly. And evil.

    Barbaric savages all.

    I doubt we will be as forgiving after this next World War (or Jihad as the Mohametans like to call it) as we were after the last.

    I know that I am all out of compassion and forgiveness for these ugly evil savages.

    Bombing them back to the stone age would be so easy as they haven't really progressed much further than that any way. (And I'm not joking.) If you read up on the customs and cultures of real live examples of living 'stone-age people' you will notice that there is no substantial difference in Islamic countries and 'culture'.

    Except for what we have given them.
    Or they have stolen.

    Islam repudiates democracy.
    Islamic Law outlaws democracy.
    Islam declares democracy to be Blasphemy.

    Therefore, we will wage all-out war against these backward, insane people who insist we all submit to them and their Satanic al-Lah.

    I feel no pity for them.
    I just want them gone.
    Swiftly.
    Reply to this
  • 1 Apr 2008, 6:07 PM yorkielass wrote:
    Firstly i don't give any belief to gov stats on moslem population here at all.
    2004 10.000 Somalians came over to settle in Leicester that is just in one year.
    Fjordman i think sums it up here.

    I have listened to claims regarding the supposed benefits of mass immigration, why it is inevitable and why those who resist are bad people. The propaganda is remarkably similar from the Netherlands via Britain to Sweden and Italy, and that’s not a coincidence. This is all happening as a coordinated and well-planned assault on established national cultures, organized by the European Union and supported by the national political and media elites.

    It has happened many times that a people move into an area and subdue those living there, but the natives have at least been allowed to defend themselves. It is unprecedented in the annals of history that a people is banned by their own leaders from defending their lands from foreign colonization and are even expected to fund this colonization. It is one of the greatest crimes of our age that the indigenous people of an entire continent, at least the Western half of it, are systematically deprived of their heritage, their history, their land and ultimately perhaps their entire physical existence, all with the active aid of the very individuals who are supposed to protect their interests. The only reason why this is considered positive, or even remotely acceptable, is because the natives in this case are white. There is no other reason for this.

    In Glasgow, Scotland, Kriss Donald, a 15-year-old totally innocent white schoolboy was abducted, stabbed repeatedly and then doused in petrol and burned to death by a group of Pakistani immigrants. Labour politician Mohammad Sarwar, who helped in bringing some of the men to justice, later became the first elected representative in Britain to step down due to threats against his family.

    The established historical pattern is that people who are conquered by others are harassed by the newcomers. I don’t see any reason to expect this to be different just because the natives happen to be white. On the contrary. We will be attacked even more viciously because we are a formerly dominant group. When we are told that mass immigration is “inevitable,” we are actually being told that verbal and physical abuse of out children is inevitable and that we should “get used to it.” I see no reason to accept that. If mass immigration leads to harassment of my children, it is my duty to resist it.

    Jews were once told to “get back to Palestine.” When they did, they were told to “get out of Palestine.” The people who said this didn’t object to where Jews lived, they objected to the fact that they existed at all. I sometimes wonder whether whites of European descent, a global minority, are the Jews of the 21st century.
    Reply to this
  • 19 Jan 2010, 5:25 PM acaros wrote:
    I feel very sad by Gareth Rogers ... The issue is complicated and will be a long process but definitely worth it.
    Reply to this
Leave a comment

 Enter the above security code (required)

 Name

 Email (will not be published)

 Website

Your comment is 0 characters limited to 3000 characters.