NULABOUR SAYS CALLING BARMAID LUV IS NOW DEEMED SEXUAL HARASSMENT

FROM THEOPINIONATOR:

Reading this article left me gob-struck - Women and Equalities Minister Harriet Harman - has just proposed that using the longtime British term "luv" will now be considered sexual harrassement and would allow the 'harmed" female employee to sue for compensation. To the best of my knowledge - "luv" has never been seen as a threatening word and is used with the commonality of the word THE. But the inane Minister Harman, in typical NuLabour style, is attacking the common man's British language so that he will be afraid to speak or face criminal charge and fines.

It is also appalling that this women can create this ludicrous chaos and criminality by just using her pen. Her mandate requires no debate or approval of Parliament. Yet, it can and will cost pub owners thousands and turn them into the "word police" against their very own friends and customers.

But Harriet Harman herself and by this very regulation is sexist as the bill is designed for women - to prevent them from being "sexually harassed" but nowhere do I read where she is concerned about men who might not want to be called the now deemed offensive - "luv". What about women calling women "luv" - is that always sexual harassment?

NuLabour has spent nearly 10 years trying to cower and castrate the indigenous British man- this is just another example. This will also be another nail in the coffin of the British pub.

One can postulate just how insane the enforcement of these regulations will be - Will other commonly used friendly terms also be added to the list of "unsayables"? Maybe the Women's and Equalities Commission can come up with a list or dictionary of permissable words and issue a copy to all pubs and other places where people mix.  Is Minister Harman planning on removing the use of these words from television programmes, theater and radio? Does this also mean the the Geico commercials, popular worldwide for the little lizard with the British accent -
voice provided by Eastenders star - Jake Wood are examples of violations? Here'a a TV commercial where the geko is using the word "love" with a female interviewer - is he sexually harassing her? -Can Geico be sued? Can Jake Wood be sued?  According to nutter Harriet - all are possiblities.

My comment for Harriet Harman - "Luv - get a life! and get your BIG nose out of my life!"

entire article - emphases mine

Don't call the barmaid 'love', by order of Harriet Harman

By STEVE DOUGHTY - More by this author » Last updated at 11:39am on 31st March 2008

Bar managers and store owners face large-scale compensation claims if their customers ogle their barmaids, waitresses or check-out staff.

New sex discrimination laws also mean that landlords who allow loud sexist jokes or banter among drinkers could be taken before a tribunal.

The regulations say that bosses are responsible for protecting their staff from sexual harassment by customers - and that those who fail to do so can face unlimited compensation claims.

Scroll down for more ...

Bet Lynch

Pub rules: Bet Lynch and Mike Baldwin in Coronation Street - bar managers and store owners face large-scale compensation claims if their customers ogle their barmaids, waitresses or check-out staff

They mean that a pub landlord could be sued if a bar worker complains about being called "love", or over customers telling each other off-colour jokes.

Restaurant managers or hoteliers risk action if staff object to backchat from diners or guests asking for a date.

By order: Women and Equalities Minister Harriet Harman

Lawyers said yesterday that businesses will need to show they have tried to clamp down on sexual harassment of workers by customers if they are to guard against the risk of compensation claims.

They advised pub operators to put up warning notices telling drinkers that "harassment is not tolerated".

The regulations were pushed through by Women and Equalities Minister Harriet Harman, who has powers under European legislation to amend discrimination law.

Miss Harman has used a statutory instrument that does not require a division or debate in Parliament.

Complying with the rules is likely to cost "micro and small" businesses more than £10million, according to an assessment by the Government Equalities Office.

Last year the High Court ruled that existing sex discrimination law was not strong enough to meet the demands of European directives.

However the regulations - which will come into force on Sunday - have sweeping implications for employers, especially in the pub, restaurant and hotel trade.

Stuart Chamberlain, an employment law specialist at Consult GEE, said: "Employers may feel uncomfortable about confronting clients but they need to be aware that failing to take action could result in a claim for compensation, including for injury to feelings.

"Shops, bars or gyms may be able to put up notices explaining that harassment of staff is not tolerated by the management.

"However, professional services companies who encourage staff to socialise with clients may find it far more difficult to convey that message."

The rules allow tribunals to award unlimited damages for injury to feelings if a case is proved.

The burden of proof will lie with employers. There will be no need for workers to show their employer allowed harassment to happen - instead, managers must demonstrate that they were not at fault.

Workers must show they suffered three incidents of harassment before they can make a claim. The incidents can involve different customers, so it will not be enough for a bar manager to ban just one difficult drinker.

The kind of behaviour that amounts to harassment will be for a tribunal to decide. If an employee can prove she was hurt or upset, being called "love" or "darling" repeatedly might be enough to win compensation.

Jill Kirby of the centre-Right think tank Centre for Policy Studies said: 'This latest round of discrimination legislation has moved far beyond common sense. It will bring the law into disrepute.

"It is trying to legislate against everyday behaviour. People will start to be afraid if they call someone young lady or my love. It is impossible for an employer to control customers in this way."

Stephen Alambritis, of the Federation of Small Businesses, said: "It really is unfair to employers to expect them to vouch for every customer, including those who aren't regulars.

"Landlords will have to sit around trying to listen in on customers' conversations, rather than having any rest period or break.

"We would hope that common sense would prevail without the need for heavy-handed legislation that leaves employers immensely worried.

"Pubs are mostly well run in this country and landlords know when to step in and calm things down. They should be trusted to do so."

The laws will be policed by the Government's Commission for Equality and Human Rights. A spokesman said: "When employers know that harassment is going on they are in a position to do something about it."

The commission said the regulations are aimed at dealing with the "particular problem" of harassment in the hotel and restaurant trade, which employs 670,000 women.

The European Equal Treatment Directive which the regulations will enforce says that women at work should not be "subjected to any conduct related to their sex which violates their dignity or creates an intimidating, hostile, degrading, humiliating or offensive environment".

 

What did you think of this article?




Trackbacks
  • No trackbacks exist for this post.
Comments

  • 1 Apr 2008, 2:14 PM Chaya wrote:
    I just went to her website and sent her a message. Called her 'luv' and told her that this law is idiotic and that I'm a woman! I also told her that I didn't think I would want to visit Englnd the way it's going.
    Reply to this
  • 1 Apr 2008, 3:23 PM TheOPINIONATOR wrote:
    Thanks Chaya - you're a luv!
    Reply to this
    1. 2 Apr 2008, 6:46 AM Chaya wrote:
      I think that Harriet Harman's office has to be deluged with e-mails and phone calls and even picketing of her office - by both men AND women!! You people have to organize something!! Make posters and pins with just the word 'LUV' written on it and distribute them all over the place!!
      Reply to this
  • 1 Apr 2008, 4:01 PM Beam me up Scotty wrote:
    I call my husband 'luv'. When i'm in a good mood that is, or when I want him to do some DIY or something. Am I not allowed to do that any more? Oh my God, I can't call him darling, he will wonder what is wrong! What am I going to do? Will have to think of something else won't I. What about when he calls me 'luv' when he comes into the pub and I pull a pint for him! Can I report him and have him locked up? Might not be such a bad thing after all. Toodlepip.
    Reply to this
  • 4 Jun 2009, 12:48 AM Duncan wrote:
    Hi.
    "Voice provided by Jake Wood"
    Can you update the link to its new location:
    http://theinspirationroom.com/daily/2006/geico-gecko-voiced-by-jake-wood
    Reply to this
Leave a comment

 Name

 Email (will not be published)

 Website

Your comment is 0 characters limited to 3000 characters.