>
http://www.geertwilders.nl/
BBC defends Muslim beheading by a Christian
Exclusive by Derek Robins - BBC bosses have defended the grisly beheading of a Muslim by a Christian zealot in new drama Bonekickers.
In the bloody scene, ex-EastEnder Paul Nicholls plays a fundamentalist who decapitates a Muslim with a sword.
Producer Rhonda Smith said: "It's not meant to be shocking or to cause offence and it comes very much from the storyline."
..................................................................................................................................................................
If this were a Muslim beheading a Christian the BBC would not show, or even think about showing such a thing because it would portray the Religion of Peace in a negative way.
The use of language is also interesting, if we refer to Muslims as fundamentalist we are, to all intents and purposes committing a hate crime, it appears that this use of language does not apply to people of the Christian faith.
I do not have any more information as yet, I will try to find more
Gandalf
The bbc are beyond contempt, bad enough they're our equivalent of radio moscow and the mouthpiece of the goverment and EUSSR. Everytime they want to portray fundamentalists it's either christians or another white protest group who i don't remember having beheaded anyone in my lifetime!
Reply to this
More BBC 'inversion of reality' - a typical Marxist trick. All the baddies are white and all the goodies/victims are ethnic. Just like on the streets of our cities.
Reply to this
Gee, more "artistic license" demonizing whites for their uncontrollable and ubiquitous racism against those who are "different". Has it ever happened? No. Is it likely to happen? No.
But if you depicted it the other way around (as it truly HAS happened several times), the poor beleaguered Muslims would be screaming in the streets and burning cars in protest of such an "unfair" depiction of wanton Islamic violence (which, of course, never occurs because Islam is a religion of peace).
Reply to this
Hope you have all joined me in a protest against paying the TV tax. Been to court a couple times over it and the 3rd time is coming up.
Dont mind if they report how they report but I will be damned if I have to pay for it willingly.
Where is citizen Smith when we need him.
As he would say POWER TO THE PEOPLE.
Anybody remember him?
Reply to this
http://www.tpuc.org/stoppayingtvlicencefees">http://www.tpuc.org/stoppayingtvlicencefees
Defender he's here John and his mates can help you fight this!
Take the buggers on via English common law.
I took tiscali on and after hearing from them weekly all has now ceased when i demanded a court trial with a jury of my peers.adding what laws were they contemplating using to harass me which in it's
Under English common law we have very much power we just don't use it.
Get a copy also of the 1689 English bill of rights that lays out our entitlements.
At the moment though it's the BBC they have broken the charter and in that tell them to go FXXX themselves.
Read this site fully any questions place a comment John is now a freeman of England which i'm following.
I'm also like many refusing the licence unlawful tax.
Then my income tax is next inline.
Drafts there to copy and send quick to the BBC Telling them you will not be paying your license tax.
After you get a reply invite them to your home have TV in situ so they can see it.
Inform the person you are to tape the conversation..make them comfy with a cuppa.
Think the BBC want this splashed across the papers that what they are doing re this tax is not legal at all.
Impartial means free from all bias..again the charter wrecked.
Free from monies yet the BBC accept EU Money.
charter wrecked.
We need to make ourselves aware of the laws we have these left for our protection just incase we ever got evil buggers in power.
These laws cannot be destroyed although MPs want to kid us they can.
Traitors are that...i pay nothing to traitors of my country by way of illegal fines or taxes.
That the pretended power of suspending the laws or the execution of laws by regal authority without consent of Parliament is illegal;
That the pretended power of dispensing with laws or the execution of laws by regal authority, as it hath been assumed and exercised of late, is illegal;
That the commission for erecting the late Court of Commissioners for Ecclesiastical Causes, and all other commissions and courts of like nature, are illegal and pernicious;
That levying money for or to the use of the Crown by pretence of prerogative, without grant of Parliament, for longer time, or in other manner than the same is or shall be granted, is illegal;
That it is the right of the subjects to petition the king, and all commitments and prosecutions for such petitioning are illegal;
That the raising or keeping a standing army within the kingdom in time of peace, unless it be with consent of Parliament, is against law;
That the subjects which are Protestants may have arms for their defence suitable to their conditions and as allowed by law;
That election of members of Parliament ought to be free;
That the freedom of speech and debates or proceedings in Parliament ought not to be impeached or questioned in any court or place out of Parliament;
http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/england.htm
http://www.tpuc.org/stoppayingtvlicencefees">http://www.tpuc.org/stoppayingtvlicencefees
Reply to this