>
Man set on fire for dating a Muslim girl
The scourge of Islam and the twisted perverted mindset of its followers continues to manifest itself in our society, many of the lunatic left will see this rampant carnage as a "cry for help" from a misunderstood, victimized and maligned minority.
Such people have lost any kind of ability to clearly evaluate what is actually happening in this country and will readily blame the victim for the ills that have been visited upon them by the Religion of Peace.
Just what would these people say to a young man who has been set alight, made into a human torch, suffered 65% burns to his body and is now in a serious condition in hospital?
This country, thanks to the Muslim is now akin to South Africa and Zimbabwe, In South Africa people are being "necklaced" with burning car tyres, in Zimbabwe people are being killed for just being there, in the UK our OAP's are being attacked, young women are being sexually assaulted and as I have said young men are being burned alive.
Do not make any mistake, this is NOT a crime wave this is the enactment of the commands of Mohammed by Muslims, this has got nothing to do with greed or deprivation this is an attack on us, the people of this country.
The attack I refer to happened in Forest Gate London, the young man was set alight because he dated a Muslim girl.
There is another significant factor in this case, the young man who was torched was a Hindu, the Hindu is seen as an Idolater in Muslim eyes and they are at the top of the list yes above the Children of the Book and the Jew for extermination, the Hindu is not offered dhimmitude, they are to be killed.
I do hope this young man makes as much of a recovery as he can, sadly he will be disfigured for life.
How do we respond to such atrocities, well for a start we can cut all interactions with Muslim females, do not speak to them, do not include them in any social activity, do not allow them to enter places where non Muslims frequent etc, and if they ask why we are behaving in such a way tell them why.
Secondly Muslim males should be deterred from even approaching non Muslim women, how this is to be done I will leave to your discretion.
Finally, remove Islam from this land by what ever means possible.
Here is the article
Hindu man set on fire in East London 'for dating Muslim girl'
Police were appealing for witnesses today following the attempted murder of a man who was doused in petrol and set on fire in east London.
The 20-year-old, who is fighting for his life in hospital, was torched as he sat in his car in Forest Gate.
It is believed the Hindi victim, who suffered 65 per cent burns in the attack, was targeted because he was dating a Muslim girlfriend.
He had just parked his car, a green Honda Prelude, in St George’s Road when he was approached by the suspect or suspects and had petrol poured over him before being set alight.
He managed to get out of the vehicle and was discovered nearby before being taken to hospital and transferred to a specialist burns unit where he remains in a critical condition.
A police spokesman said: “Officers were called to the scene at 6am last Thursday to reports of a man on fire.”
DI Sam Faulkner, from the violent crime unit at Forest Gate said: “This was a very nasty attack and the victim remains in a critical condition.
“We are appealing for witnesses or anyone with information to come forward and would particularly like to hear from anyone who saw the suspect making off.”
Two men aged 20 and 21 have been arrested on suspicion of attempted murder and released on bail.
Today's appeal comes as a 15-year-old girl and a man in his 20s are both still critically ill after being set alight in two separate attacks in the Greater London area last weekend.
"Today's appeal comes as a 15-year-old girl and a man in his 20s are both still critically ill after being set alight in two separate attacks in the Greater London area last weekend. "
http://www.thelondonpaper.com/cs/Satellite/london/news/article/1157152774143?packedargs=suffix%3DArticleController
How much of this stuff is going on that gets no further than the local press?
Reply to this
it got a few lines in the Sun
Reply to this
The presence of Muslims is incompatible with civilised society. They must be persuaded to leave by what ever means may be appropriate. The future of Christendom depends upon us removing these savages from our countries.
Reply to this
Hahahahahahahahaa ... Hookies off to America where they really know what a prison sentence is.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7465239.stm
Reply to this
Sublime! I hope he gets a hell's angel for a cell-mate.
Reply to this
Make that "Hooky's"
Who's next? Uncle Abu?
Reply to this
One of the comments at the London Paper site:
Guest_Joe Dozer says: Interfaith dating has often been upsetting to the families involved. This is a cultural matter that we as Westerners have to repect. When you invite someone into your home it is rude to critize their manners. Just grin and bear it. However, such acts contribute to global warming and should be condemned on that basis.
Yes, it's rude to critcize strangers for setting fire to people. Just 'grin and bear it'. Oh, and btw, just when did we invite these invaders into our homes?
I hope Joe Dozer is being sarcastic!
Reply to this
OT but...
http://archbishop-cranmer.blogspot.com/
Friday, June 20, 2008
Royal Assent given to the Treaty of Lisbon
'La Reine le veult', proclaims the Royal Assent in Norman French. It passed by with scarcely a mention, and with little understanding of its significance. While the show ran for weeks on the House of Commons, and notable Peers spent a few days in the limelight, strutting and fretting their hour upon the stage, they are now heard no more, for the Royal Seal has been bestowed, and Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II has given her assent to the Treaty of Lisbon - the EU Constitution - which will come into force on 1st January 2009.
One of the most significant aspects of the treaties of Rome, Maastricht, and Lisbon concerns the constitutional position of the Monarch. During her reign, Queen Elizabeth I stated: ‘To no power whatsoever is my crown subject save to that of Christ the King of Kings.’ Section Three of the Treason Felony Act of 1848 asserts that condemnation is incurred ‘If any person whatsoever shall, within the United Kingdom or without, compass, imagine, invent, devise or intend to deprive or depose our most gracious Lady the Queen...from the style, honour, or royal name of the imperial crown of the United Kingdom.’
The Treaty of Maastricht made the Queen subject to the European Union and a citizen of that Union. As a citizen of a different political entity and being subject to past and future judgements of the Court of the European Communities in Luxembourg, from which there is no appeal, her role as a constitutional monarch has been put into doubt. By the treaty, this Court was confirmed in authority over her courts, in which she was not previously arraignable. Her status as a citizen of the EU has rendered her, like the rest of the British people, ‘subject to the duties imposed thereby’.
The Privy Counsellor’s Oath, to which all prime ministers are sworn, is a promise ‘To bear faith and allegiance to the Crown and to defend its jurisdiction and powers against all foreign...persons...or states.’ While there is no doubt that this oath was breached at Maastricht, the situation over Lisbon is somewhat more grave because Lisbon is a constitution.
A country cannot have two constitutions. The laws and constitution of the United Kingdom are diametrically opposed by European laws and the European Constitution. One has to submit to the other, and, as is observed and clearly stated, the Lisbon Treaty ‘takes primacy’.
If the EU Constitution is superior to the British Constitution, at the point the Treaty was given Royal Assent the British Constitution was abolished. Since the EU is a military union, it has the means at its disposal to carry out its objectives.
The politicians are, of course, to blame. And so are the Lords – temporal and spiritual – and so is the judiciary.
But let us be clear. more..
Reply to this
Perhaps norman kember put up the bail money for these two poor oppressed souls.
So far, I haven't seen anything in our esteemed liberal media on this story, though we may surmise that robert fisk, or yvone ridley, are busy writing pieces explaining the acts of mohammedan self-defence as a response to the continued existence of Israel, or as a legacy of the Crusades.
You know, the usual stuff, it's all our fault blah blah blah...
Reply to this
I'm genuinely sorry that this young man has had his life destroyed by islamic scum. Still, at the end of the day, and I hope I am not being overly crude here, who on earth would want a girl friend without a clitoris in the first place?
Reply to this
Do not presume that the Muslim 'girlfriend' is innocent here...
She may be a very jolly little Mujahideen.
Reply to this