>
http://www.geertwilders.nl/
ABU QATADA GETS £50,000 PER YEAR "for wanting to kill us."
How bloody stupid can you get, this country has completely lost its marbles, Abu Qatada is going to get £8000 per year for his, wait for it, his bad back, this man who has not done a days work since he has been here and probably in his life is getting our money.
This is where your tax money goes people, this is why your tax bill has gone up, gone up to pay people like Qatada and thousands like him to sit around and abuse us, plot to kill us, rubbish our country and worse.Young Muslims 'turn to extremism' and spouting rubbish like this
Islamic law has a place in Britain
The cretin who allowed this needs publically flogging but as the DSS is riddled with Muslims it is no surprise they said have some more money Mr Qatada sir.
This man and his family recieve :
£8000 per annum for a bad back
Qatada's 45-year-old wife has been getting £499.62 a week housing benefit = £25,908 per year
£81.55 a week child benefit, for four of the couple's four youngest children aged 17, 14, nine and six=£4240per annum.She also receives around £240 a week income support=£12,480 per annum and is fully exempt from the annual council tax bill of £2,283.
Grand total= £50,628.
All of that plus we have to pay for the completely inefective bail restrictions.Muslim extremist Abu Qatada to receive £8,000 incapacity benefits a year - for his bad back
By Tom Kelly
Last updated at 4:13 PM on 22nd June 2008
Abu Qatada will receive £150 a week of taxpayers' money because his back condition means he is unable to work
Fanatical cleric Abu Qatada is to receive almost £8,000 a year in benefits because he has a bad back.
The suspected Al Qaeda leader, described as Osama bin Laden's ambassador in Europe, will get £150 a week of taxpayer's cash after being released from jail last week.
Astonishingly, he was granted the incapacity benefit because his back condition makes him unfit to work, even though he is only allowed out of his home for two hours a day, meaning it would be almost impossible for him to get a job.
Qatada left Long Lartin prison in Worcestershire after the Appeal Court blocked his deportation to Jordan, where he is wanted on terror charges.
He is now living in an £800,000 four bedroom Edwardian semi in a tree lined suburban street in West London.
The cleric's incapacity benefit have pushed the family's annual handouts bill to over £50,000.
Expect the price tag to keep climbing for this slimeball as you can be sure that his "bad back" won't keep he and his wife from producing many more children for the British taxpayer to support. Maybe he'll even "find" a couple more wives now that the idiots in the government have given the OK to taxpayer funded muslim polygamy.
This sorry excuse for a man should have been kicked out of the UK immediately upon release from jail - along with his family - it is as if the UK judicial system has a death wish for the country in keeping this scum around - a sponger who immediately spewed more vitirolic hate towards the same people who went & will continue to go without in order to keep his wife and children in clothes, food and heaven knows what else while he was warming his ugly backside in jail. Now Papa Sponge is back on the dole.
Makes me feel like vomiting.
Aren't there any psychological competency tests done on judges?? - there should be!!
Reply to this
I believe there are. Unfortunately, only those who fail are appointed judges.
Reply to this
Islamic Law has no place in Britain - just as Aboriginal Law has no place in Australia.
Reply to this
5 members of the Parachute Regiment were killed in Afghanistan a week ago. According to the Sunday Times 22 June a further Regular and 3 members of the TA were killed having been deliberately targeted by this mans associates last week.
Would I be right if I said they died to preserve the freedom of this man and keep him from harm? The logic would seem to be if we do not give murderous lying foreigners refuge and money we are doomed to be oppressed by the state so by saving them we are saving ourselves.
To think otherwise is deemed "fascist"
BTW the hairdresser ordered to pay £4000 for upsetting an unsuitable muslim job applicant recently could not defend herself because a suitably qualified lawyer would have cost her £260 AN HOUR! Who is paying for his legal "team" and how much? I can make a fair guess about the first but anyone know the answer to the second?
Reply to this