AL QAEDA WORRIES ABOUT "SUGGESTIVE" CUCUMBERS AND GOATS
The real reasons are surfacing as to why Iraqi Sunnis turned on Al Qaeda in late 2006, and with American military backing helped to remove Al Qaeda from their area. Al Qaeda tried to force their version of the "Religion of Peace" upon their newly acquired muslim Iraqi areas and the people who lived there.
Such as:
Female goats killed because their genitalia were unconvered and tails pointed upward - thus exposed. (Sexy goats??)
Cumcumbers were said to be male (tomatoes were female) thus women could not buy those "suggestive" vegetables. (Sexy cucumbers?)
Ice cream salesman was killed because ice cream was not available during the time of Mohommed.
Men had fingers sliced off - for smoking.
Hair salons and shops selling cosmetics were blown up.
Treatment of women by male doctors was forbidden.
Singing - was forbidden.
Shaving - was forbidden Sideburns -was forbidden. Any barbers who did either were killed.
Man who sold musical CD's on list to be killed and shop to be bombed.
Women were given leaflets threatening with kidnapping or death if they didn't wear the niqab.
Iraqi women were forced to marry Al Qaeda men.
Those who did not give their allegiance to Al Qaeda were slaughtered - even children
Thus, disgusted by such acts and oppression, the Iraqi Sunni leaders and people saw that it was far better to work with the American & British military rather than suffer such outrageous treament by Al Qaeda terrorists. This change in allegiance is part of the reason that the number of American & British military post "surge" civilian and military deaths have dramatically dropped. An observation and fact that most mainstream media continue to be reluctantant to cite.
The insanely bizarre rules and behaviours of Al Qaeda leads many to believe that Al Qaeda is its OWN WORST ENEMY. Thus in the future one could see Al Qaeda terrorists at least partially brought down by a common vegetable - the cucumber -- or an unclothed female goat. How fitting.
For full article go HERE

>



http://www.geertwilders.nl/







Anyone have anymore info about this situation?
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&code=20080813&articleId=9817
The World it at a very dangerous crossroads. America in alliance with NATO and Israel has embarked upon a military adventure.
The Bush administration has launched with the approval of the US Congress a naval blockade directed against Iran, which could be a first step towards an all out war.
Military sources report a massive deployment of US and allied naval power in the Persian Gulf, the Arabian Sea and the Red Sea directed against Iran.
There has been a virtual media blackout regarding this naval deployment. The Western media, including the printed press and network TV have failed to meaningfully address these war preparations.
While war plans directed against Iran are casually acknowledged, the broader implications of a war on Iran are rarely analyzed.
The US media has become a unconditional mouthpiece of the Pentagon. The Islamic Republic is relentlessly accused, without a evidence and substantiation, of developing nuclear weapons, as well as working hand in glove with Al Qaeda.
The emerging political consensus among America's allies, including France, Germany and Italy is that a war on Iran is warranted as a means to enhancing global security.
This consensus is formulated while carefully disregarding the fact that even a limited "punitive" aerial attack on Iran, would immediately result in escalation, engulfing the entire Middle East Central Asian region from the Eastern Mediterranean to China's western frontier into an extended war zone. There are at present three distinct war theater in the region: Afghanistan, Iraq and Palestine. An attack on Iran could potentially engulf a large number of countries into a much broader conflict.
Reply to this
Jolly good idea, Defender!
More of it, I say.
Move those ships and gunboats and missile launchers as close as we can get them to Iran, Pakistan, and Afghanistan.
Let's really show these sexual perverts what we think of them and their vile "religion".
Reply to this