>
http://www.geertwilders.nl/
What would we do without the Danes?
Thank God for the Danes, they will go where others in the western world fear to tread, it is to our unending shame that publishers in the UK or America would not publish this book, they are all scared stiff of Muslims and Islam, such is the fear of reprisal against them they willingly submit at the slightest hint of reprisal or fear of upsetting the universal censors of free speech, they should be utterly ashamed
A Danish publisher is in negotiations to buy Sherry Jones's novel about the child bride of Muhammad, which was dropped by Random House in America and pulled from bookshops in Serbia.
The Jewel of Medina tells the story of Aisha, one of Muhammad's wives, from the age of six to 18 when Muhammad dies. It was bought by Random House US for a reported advance of $100,000, but then dropped after the publisher was told by academics and security experts that publication was potentially more risky than Salman Rushdie's The Satanic Verses and the Danish publication of cartoons of Muhammad.
The article goes on to say:
She added: "I think that whether you are Muslim, Buddhist, Christian, Hindu or atheist you have to be able to bear insults. You can't say 'I'm a Muslim, and that means I should be above criticism'. You can freely insult Jesus Christ, you can mock other religions."
Sadly on this point I think she is wrong when criticizing Muslims, Islam or Sharia law because the wonderful UN has rolled over to Islam yet again
There are 57 Muslim nations represented in the UN, all of these nations vote as a bloc, they vote in such a manner as to ensure that the Islamic countries are not affected by any so called UN resolution.
The UN is clearly split and in reality is totally subservient to the Islamic bloc.
Some time ago it was mooted that the freedom to criticize sharia law within the UN would be withdrawn, this has now happened, Islam cannot be criticized at all in the UN.
All other religions are fair game for any critic as they are seen as "imperfect" by Islam.
This move by the UN sends out a huge signal to the Muslim world that Islam is set above all other religions, Sharia law cannot be separated from Islam, it is the core of Islam, for this to be recognized as such by a global authority is a huge mistake
This will have huge ramifications globally and on a national level, Muslim representatives in other nation states will be able to refer to the UN ruling if they feel that sharia law has been insulted or brought into disrepute, and thus put pressure on national governments to act against any critics of Islam.
The UN has to go, it is a useless organization that has not solved one single World issue since its inception, if anything it has made situations worse and has been complicit in war crimes (Kosovo).
Any actions taken by Muslims will no doubt be framed within Sharia law thus they cannot be criticized, they have been given a carte blanche to do or say anything as long as it is underwritten by Sharia law.
The U.N. is not a legislature. Nothing that comes out of there is anything other than hot air. As far as I'm concerned.
Nothing short of death will stop me voicing my opinion on Islam ... or any other topic, including the U.N.
For instance: it's my opinion that Mohammed Atta picked the wrong tall building.
I have plenty of opinions about plenty of topics.
Reply to this
Danes. Yes.
And the nearest thing the world - including the Danes - has these days to a Churchill is a Dutchman - and he gets treated much as Churchill was treated until his day arrived.
Geert Wilders.
Reply to this
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/2629194/Asylum-seeker-has-deadly-super-TB.html
Meanwhile, here in West Yorkshire, we have the arrival of XDR TB thanks to a Somalian asylum seeker.
Quote.."XDR TB poses a worldwide threat amid major concerns over increasing resistance of tuberculosis to antibiotics which originally proved highly effective against the illness. The World Health Organisation has warned that if the strain becomes established, it could lead to a TB epidemic leaving few options for treatment."
This chap is reportedly the first to be "diagnosed" in Britain...one wonders if more are walking round with it!
Reply to this
Ed
How can NuLabour, which has opened the doors wide, deport this Somali? He afterall, is going to vote NuLabour just as soon as he is granted citizenship.
Given the rate that citizenship is being granted to illegal immigrants, asylum seekers etc, and the fact that elections are decided in marginal seats, where a few hundred votes makes the difference, NuLabour may actually win the next election.
There is a silver lining though - One more term of NuLabour will destroy the country, and thus bring the country to its senses. Only then will we have the courage to do what is necessary.
Reply to this
This has been going on for years and about 3-4 years ago the cost of treating drug resistant TB in London was draining the hospital and health budgets. It was so bad Consultants were coming out and saying "We are not racist but we cannot meet the demand from our budgets". Before that even the BBC was reporting it on "Today".
How did our wonderful Nulabour government deal with it?
1. The provided extra money to shut the doctors and administrators up.
2. The BBC ran at least one prime time news story about a young white London woman who had contracted TB. The line was - "See! It is not only immigrants who have it!" That she probably caught it from an immigrant in a crowded bus or tube was not mentioned.
3. They had the BBC question the head of the Hillingdon(?) NHS trust on Radio 4 on the strain being put on the NHS by immigrants and asylum seekers. He airily informed the nation that the cost of treating people who were not entitled in his trust was only £30,000 a year which on a budget of £XYZ millions was "Absolutely nothing."
BUT If the government had told them to treat every immigrant and asylum seeker who walked through their doors - for the very good reason of stopping the spread of TB and Aids - 80% of the aids cases in the UK are reported to be from sub-Saharan Africa (sub-Saharan - PC code for black) one could say they were "entitled" and would not be included in the £30,000 figure.
What he said was one of those "conditional" truths which were a specialty of that other TB scourge Tony Blair. But as it appears to be a deliberate attempt to mislead most would call it a straight lie.
Reply to this