NEW PAKISTANI BRIDE KEEPS MUSLIM OUT OF JAIL FOR RACE HATE ATTACK
Well here is yet another instance to add to our every growing list of "YOU COULDN'T MAKE THIS STUFF UP" - when it comes to the kid-gloved manner that the dhimmified British judicial systems treats muslims who are convicted of crimes or other wrongdoings.
In this latest case a gang of "Asian" men (mediaspeak for muslims) including Waqas Shah racially abused Dean Cotterill, his girlfriend and sister as the trio were standing outside of a pub - minding their own business - having a smoke. To avoid any trouble, Dean and the two women decided to leave the area -----"but were followed by the Asians, some of whom then crossed the road but the defendant walked right behind the victim and then beside him. Mr Cotterill asked Shah if everything was all right and when the victim asked to shake his hand, Shah abused him and, without warning, punched him in the face."
So Mr. Cotterill's hand, outstreched in peace, was not only met with more racial verbal abuse but also Shah's quick hard fist to his face, fracturing Cotterill's nose. David Cotterill's next memory is of the back of an ambulance as he had been knocked out by the coldcocking.
You can imagine the outrage if the British Mr. Cotterill had been tossing racist taunts at Shah/muslim and then assaulted Shah as above. The media would go beserk - headlines of racism/race hate attack - and follow up interviews with the community to see how they were coping with this horrid Islamopobia. So what happened to Shah?
"The defendant (25), of Manor Street, Nelson, admitted racially aggravated assault causing actual bodily harm. He was given 10 months in prison, suspended for two years, with 100 hours unpaid work and £1,000 compensation."
Surely you are wondering why Shahs prison sentence was suspended - what could possibly be a good reason for not having this racist serve time for stalking and premeditated assault?
"He had just married and, if he was sent to prison, his wife would not be able to come over from Pakistan.
Yes, David Cottrill gets NO real justice for the crime committed against him because the Shah's new bride wouldn't be able to immigrate to the UK.
Outrageous?? Yes!! but even more so due to many other instance of muslims getting out of jailtime, fines, arrest, etc. for violating British laws - clearly due to the fact that they are muslims.
Here are just several examples:
Muslim is spared speeding ban so he can travel between his two wives
Muslim councillor commits benefit fraud Judge threatens to sentence him to jail but in the end Arif Waghat gets a suspended sentence and he chooses to remain a councillor
In fact not only are racist muslims not punished but they receive taxpayer's money through government grants -- UK GOVERNMENT GIVES GRANT TO MUSLIM HATE BLOGGERS
Extremist race hate charge dropped after Abdul Muhid says British troops in Iraq should be slaughtered and homosexuals should be hurled from clifftops and towers (even though there were plenty of witnesses)
The moral seems to be - if your are going to break UK laws - you are at a clear advantage if you are muslim.
For article mentioned above go to:
Shop boss spared jail after Nelson race hate attack (notice muslim purposely not mentioned in headline)
>


>













However, there's a little victory today!
The shite boy flogging facilitator, zaidi, has been found guilty of child cruelty following a display of multicult enrichment and diversity.
http://news.sky.com/skynews/Home/UK-News/Muslim-Found-Guilty-Of-Child-Cruelty-After-Forcing-Boys-To-Beat-Themselves-With-Zanjeer-Zani/Article/200808415088002?lpos=UK%2BNews_2&lid=ARTICLE_15088002_Muslim%2BFound%2BGuilty%2BOf%2BChild%2BCruelty%2BAfter%2BForcing%2BBoys%2BTo%2BBeat%2BThemselves%2BWith%2BZanjeer%2BZani
It's interesting to note that the pious flogger did not believe it was doing wrong
'This is part of our religion'
Yes, indeed.
Reply to this
According to the ITV report this is not the first time this has happened. Usually the police approach "community leaders" explain it is illegal and ask them not to do it again and that is the end of the matter.
In his case he seems to have rejected this approach and told the police to "shove it" which is the only reason they prosecuted.
Thought. Shouldn't they be made to pay for ant medical treatment required after one of these sessions?
Reply to this