St George's Day Parade AXED - Council says it's UNHEALTHY & attracts RACIST THUGS

FROM THEOPINIONATOR:

I have written about the direct assault against the St George's Day parade see

ST GEORGE'S PARADE STOPPED BUT "INFLAMMATORY" MARCH FOR MOHAMMED WENT ON

and         ST GEORGE'S DAY PARADE AXED FOR SECOND TIME

Now comes the news that the West Bromwich St George's Day parade is permanently cancelled. The LABOUR controlled Sandwell Council has intentionally and vindictively removed financial support - leaving organisers no choice but to drop all plans for the parade .

Why?

In the  words of Councillor, Yvonne Davies: "the parade created an unhealthy atmosphere and inspired young boys to be racist.
It is not only the parade which is the problem, but the tribal excitement it creates".

"Tribal excitement"?????? My My - Doesn't that have RACIST connotations?? Where are the Labour political correctness-stasi??? -- perhaps Yvonne is confusing this:

On the march: Led by a mounted knight representing St George, the West Bromwich parade in 2005
 


With this:

riots

OR this

Londongaza110

Or maybe Yvonne is worried about police being able to control all those "racist" parade goers like  HERE

Unfortunately for us all -  this is another egregious, direct assault on British customs and traditions by the muslim worshipping, British loathing,  dhimmi jackasses that permeate the government on local and national levels.


For article go to:

Axe Fall on St George: Parade is halted after Coucil say it attracts racist thugs

 

What did you think of this article?




Trackbacks
  • Trackbacks are closed for this post.
Comments

  • 12 Feb 2009, 9:54 AM urban11 wrote:
    I'm not a fan of newspeak, but in future the word Labour should be replaced by Stalinist.
    Anyone not voting BNP wants their head examined, Call me Dave will not save you.
    Reply to this
    1. 12 Feb 2009, 11:04 AM Anonymous wrote:
      "Anyone not voting BNP wants their head examined"

      BNP supporters seem to fall into four categories (with some overlap):

      1) Ethnic nationalists. People who want to retain Britain's Anglo-Celtic genetic identity.

      2) Economic nationalists - people who have no objections to foreigners as individuals, but don't like them taking their jobs or depriving British people of other resources.

      3) Cultural nationalists. People who are not worried about the race of immigrants, but expect them to integrate with British culture. This group tend to be opposed to Muslims and gangstas, but are not particularly bothered about law-abiding immigrants.

      4) Anglospherists. This group aren't really nationalists at all. They are internationalists of a rather restricted range. They are anti-EU, anti-Islam, pro-American, pro-Australian, usually pro-Israeli and often pro-Indian (vis a vis Pakistan).
      Reply to this
  • 12 Feb 2009, 9:56 AM Ed wrote:
    There is no law in the land to prevent anybody meeting up with friends in their home town on St George's day for a sociable gathering.

    Should anybody wish to wear red/white/blue clothing is their right and nobody can do a thing about it.
    Reply to this
  • 12 Feb 2009, 5:52 PM Sir Henry Morgan wrote:
    It's not all bad news.

    http://www.wigantoday.net/wigannews/Parades-to-make-comeback.4973054.jp

    Mind you, this is not a heavily enriched town by the standards of other towns in Lancashire - though we are getting that way.
    Reply to this
  • 27 Feb 2009, 7:34 PM lal.connell wrote:
    We English are finished.What these councils are doing should be illegal.Any immigrant can celebrate their saints day.No problem with that .but i have a great problem with these anti english councils. They are no better than traitors.They should be leading these parades. Showing they are proud of us and our country.But they are laughing at us .Thats the worst part.How have been brainwashed into believing that patriotism is the same as racism.Is this what they mean by spin?And how is it that the only party that is patriotic is branded right wing racist and violent.Is there any evidence of them attacking any one?Or is the truth that if they allowed them the same freedoms as other parties.And they were free to march would it then be undeniable that they were the ones who were being attacked as opposed to the ones doing the attacking.These councillors are payed by us but they are always against us.If there is a chance of any difference of opinion between our indigenous population and any one not of our race they are always against us.I don,t believe they are frightened to stand up to them .They just hate us English.Maybe they have been told to this by this so called government I don,t know.BUT THEY ARE LAUGHING AT US AND I FOR ONE DON,T LIKE BEING LAUGHED AT.
    Reply to this
Leave a comment

 Enter the above security code (required)

 Name

 Email (will not be published)

 Website

Your comment is 0 characters limited to 3000 characters.