>
In Britian - When is a weapon NON Offensive? Hint = Muslim
Categories: Islam in UK,Religion,Multiculturalism,Muslim Crime
Does the below look like it could be used as an "offensive weapon" to you?
Looks to me like it could do some serious damage -but I'm wrong according to a jury in London's Southwark Crown Court. Background:
"Mohsin Khan, 21, who said he had been beating himself regularly with them since the age of six, had been driving to a West End nightclub with a friend when he was pulled over as part of a routine police check in London's Charing Cross Road. His car was searched and the flagellator - a handle with five metal chains each tipped with a sharp 10in blade - was found under his seat.....he was subsequently charged with two counts of possessing an offensive weapon "
Of course then comes the muslim excuses - which are normally eaten like candy by British judges.....and now juries.
(Khan) He explained it was used by Shia Muslims to whip themselves during Muharram, the month of mourning - something he had been doing ''since I was six''.
Interesting that in a Country whose Health & Safety hawks virtually force children to be wrapped in cotton wool and have banned playground games on the grounds they could cause injury would not be appalled and think it abusive/criminal that a six year old would have been allowed to self flagellate himself and/or considered the child as having mental illness. Of course he may have been encouraged to do so by his "devout muslim" child abusive father.
Furthermore Khan produced pictures of his bloodied back as proof that his he carried his portable Zanjeer as a spare - just in case the got the urge for more sadistic, self mutilation during the (now past) month of Muharram, the month of mourning.
"The jury, which was shown two photographs of his bloodied and scarred back following a previous self-beating session, decided he was telling the truth and cleared him of possessing the Zanjeer as an offensive weapon. "
Of course one would think that a man who touts himself as a "devout" muslim wouldn't be driving himself to a "West End nightclub"..........would he?
Which brings us to the next interesting observation. Note the type of flagellator used by Shia's in Iraq:
Now notice the type of flagellator used by generic muslims in Afghanistan:
Now compare the above pictures to the weapon (aka flagellator) used by Mohsin Khan. Big difference isn't there? And wouldn't you have thought that the jury or at least the judge would have noticed this? Clearly they didn't.
Add the above to other evidence found in Khan's auto - a knuckleduster (brass knuckles) in his door pocket:
Of course Khan had his excuse all ready - the above isn't a knuckle duster but rather a belt buckle. A belt buckle he removed because it "dug into his stomach" - something tells me it wasn't HIS stomach that got the injury. Unfortunately for Khan the jury didn't buy these lies and FINALLY convicted him of carrying an offensive weapon.
The moral of the story:
If you are going to carry an offensive weapon in Britain - make sure it resembles some type of tortuous "religious" implement.....and..... make sure you're a muslim.
Should offer the British people some 'comfort' to know that Moshin Khan is currently a second year law student and could soon be representing clients in a courtroom near you.
For Article go to:
Compare this to the recent case of Paul Clarke who handed in a shotgun found in a bin liner in his garden. He faces 5 years.
Reply to this
Gandalf an ALL UPP readers
Breaking News. The Global Warming so called science has been exposed.
Watts Up With That?
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/11/19/breaking-news-story-hadley-cru-has-apparently-been-hacked-hundreds-of-files-released/
It came out because because the institute for Climate Research unit was hacked by persons unknown.
READ IT ALL.
All western governments have invested huge amounts of political captal to AGW so they can tax the hell out of us. I predict that the government and its complicit media, are going to go all out to suppress, dismiss or deny it all.
Reply to this
Also on bastard old holbourn. Will the MSM bother with this,after all its only affecting all over our lives and taxes?
Nah, Jedward and Jordan are far more interesting
Reply to this
Urban11
The Great Global warming Swib=ndle.
Rush L has picked op on it. I hope Glenn Beck in the US does so as well. Here in the UK, the BBC has a monopoly on the broadcast media. The BBC, very much part of the Left, has been the primary propaganda arm of AGW, as it furthers their aim of global government. So not much from them on this Global scam/ swindle.
RE: AGW/AGCC
As this mock-science serves as justification for trillions of dollars in imposed and proposed new taxes, liens, fees, and rate hikes -- not to mention the absurd wealth-redistribution premise of international climate debt "reparations" -- such manipulation of evidence should be treated as exactly what it is: larceny on the grandest scale in history.
http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/11/the_evidence_of_climate_fraud.html
http://www.climatedepot.com/
http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_112009/content/01125108.guest.html
http://www.amnation.com/vfr/archives/014841.html
http://wattsupwiththat.com/
-------------------------
For the last two yaers it has been clear that far from AGW, the planet was actually cooling, and the global disaster envisaged - all our major cities under six feet of water, polar bears denuded of their fur, and planning to take revenge on humans, was not going to happen. But as Limbaugh points out, the climate scientists and all the politicians, far from being happy and relieved, are desperately unhappy. In fact, they are despereate to get the Copenhagen protocol/treaty, up and running, before the whole world catches on.
It has been about money all the time.
It is all about swindling the Western nations of money and handing it over as bribes to Third world countries.
Reply to this
Sometimes people carry to such perfection the mask they have assumed that in due course they actually become the person they seem.
Reply to this