The honours list is dishonoured - AGAIN

A peerage, a recognition of services made by an individual to the benefit of his or her country, normally this has to be a fairly significant event or action but latterly, as we all know this honour has become tainted and stained with political chicanery.

This honour
is about to descend, it would appear , to even further depths, Mohammed Abdul Bari of the MCB is tipped to be given a peerage.

The Muslim Council of Britain has already been outed as a supporter of violent radical Islam, their support for Al Qaradawi indicates their viewpoint quite well.

The government is preparing to give a peerage to the head of the Muslim Council of Britain, even though government links with the organisation are officially suspended.

Ministers are keen to find a prominent Muslim to enter the House of Lords as a way of balancing the peerage given to Chief Rabbi Jonathan Sacks earlier this year.

It is understood that the name of Muhammad Abdul Bari, secretary general of the Muslim Council of Britain, was proposed at a meeting in Downing Street earlier this week to discuss relations with the Muslim community.

The MCB has been frozen out since its deputy secretary general, Daud Abdullah, was found to have signed the Istanbul declaration calling for attacks on Jewish communities and the British navy following Israel’s military action in Gaza.



The British government refused to  communicate with the MCB and excluded them from any consultatative role with the government.

Mr Bari heads this organization, indeed he has made many statements either via the MCB or independently, here are just a few of his utterings:

Of course this is not the first time Muslims have been handed a peerage, there is "Sir" Iqbal Socranie, lord Ahmet,  that baroness woman whose name I cannot remember - I think she comes from Dewsbury, what did these people do to be so honoured by this country??  does anybody know?

I think it because they are here and are Muslims.

Mr Bari is not a person who wants the British culture to grow, lord Ahmed has openly threatened parliament and baroness whatername has done sweet bugger all for this country.

I, personally am insulted by the awarding of national honours to these people, they are NOT of this land, they have done nothing for this land - they have taken all the benefits this land offers.

Mr Bari and others like him may be honoured but not in my name, I would not address any of the above people by their invested title.

 del.icio.us  Stumbleupon  Technorati  Digg 

 

What did you think of this article?




Trackbacks
  • Trackbacks are closed for this entry.
Comments

  • 26 Nov 2009, 10:00 PM DP111 wrote:
    Lord Mohammed Abdul Bari - peer of the realm, and knight in armour to protect Her Majesty's Protestant realm.

    Yup. Sounds good to me.
    Reply to this
  • 26 Nov 2009, 11:43 PM Fred wrote:
    They reckon Blair tore up the constitution to pack the Lords with his paid cronies. Never mind his lies and crimes in Iraq what about his lies and crimes against Britain?
    Reply to this
  • 26 Nov 2009, 11:47 PM DP111 wrote:
    Labour subsidises Islamic extremism with taxpayer funding

    At PMQs today, David Cameron disclosed that £113,000 of taxpayers money has so far been donated to the Islamic Shakhsiyah Foundation. Ironically, this has been secured from the Pathfinder scheme, whose objective is supposed to be the prevention of violent extremism.

    http://archbishop-cranmer.blogspot.com/
    Reply to this
    1. 27 Nov 2009, 9:13 AM Urban11 wrote:
      Perhaps it is just their way of the British intergrating more with the muslim way of life than the other way round
      Reply to this
      1. 27 Nov 2009, 10:56 AM DP111 wrote:
        Urban11

        I simply cannot bear to think that Labour may get elected again.
        The reason why this may happen, is that for the last ten years, Labour has engaged in continuous boundary changes, gerrynmandering, and bringing in millions of foreigners, to bolster its vote group.

        Considering that in marginal constituecies, the election is decided by a few hundred votes, Labour may already have done enough sabotage to win the election.

        If they win, or come back to power by forming a coalition with the Libs or SNP or whatever, the country is finished. Then nothing short of a military coup or revolution, will restore normality and commonsense.
        Reply to this
        1. 27 Nov 2009, 11:31 AM Urban11 wrote:
          Realistically,the only political solution,in my view,is for all the anti EU parties to merge. The limp dems would fold,whith their rural MPs joining BluLab,their city MPs would join ZaNuLab. A real opposition would emerge,an alliance of UKIP,BNP,and various other smaller parties. The tories would ditch Cameron like a shot and get a proper leader in. No matter who wins in that scenario,the politicians cannot go on ignoring the electorate,as they do now. Labour's vote would melt down to career welfare claimants (including those in non jobs),the hard left,a few luvvies,and thick,ignorant traditional labour voters who havn't yet worked out that the scum in labour hold them in utter contempt. Plus all the ethnics. The next development I'd like to see is Respect fielding more canditates in the "enriched,vibrant" areas such as Blackburn Brent and Bradford. That would decimate the labour vote.
          The only thing standing in the way of my "dream" is the inflated egos of the leaderships of the various parties. Given time to think,and contemplate the alternatives,the membership and supporters would probably be up for it.
          Reply to this
          1. 28 Nov 2009, 1:15 PM DP111 wrote:
            Urban11

            Do you think that the scenario you outline has any chance of taking place?

            Something has to happen first- some touchpaper to be lit, some catalyst, or some provocation to start the ball rolling.

            Another Luton perhaps, or worse.
            Reply to this
Leave a comment

 Enter the above security code (required)

 Name

 Email (will not be published)

 Website

Your comment is 0 characters limited to 3000 characters.