>
http://www.geertwilders.nl/
Red Ken Livingstone, the Islamic Forum of Europe and a 1.3 million Pound donation to a London Mosque
We all remember Ken Livingstone the EX mayor of London, well it would appear that "red Ken" has been involved in a bit of gerrymandering, yup he was buying votes, whose vote was he buying - the Muslim vote, who else is involved in this vote rigging? none other than the IFE under the guise of "Islam4 Ken"
We can now see why red Ken was so pro Islamic, why he invited people like Qaradawi to London , why he promoted everything Islamic and decried any opposite view, he was in the pocket of the Muslims.
What was the price of this vote rigging, the price that you and I paid via our taxes - 1.3 million Pounds to the East London Mosque for starters.
From the Daily TelegraphIn an election lost by Mr Livingstone, the Islamic Forum of Europe helped secure massive and unexpected swings towards him in its east London heartland.
In one ward, Spitalfields, his vote share rose from 29.6 per cent in 2004 - an election he won - to 68.4 per cent in 2008, a rise of nearly 39 percentage points.
In every other ward in Tower Hamlets and Newham with a sizeable Muslim population, his vote rose by between 23 and 36 percentage points. His vote in other Muslim and ethnic minority areas of London also rose, but by far smaller amounts.
Mr Livingstone's economic development body, the London Development Agency, had agreed to pay more than £1.3 million to the East London Mosque, controlled by the IFE, and described by critics as hardline.
Emails leaked to The Sunday Telegraph show that a senior LDA official furiously protested against at least £500,000 of this grant, saying there were "major concerns" about the mosque project and "no case" for giving it the money.
However, the official was overruled and the grant was paid.
The lust for power is clear and red ken allied himself to this group of people in order to gain an electoral victory, he paid his thirty pieces of silver, however justice prevailed - he lost.
Ken Livingstone allied himself with Muslims who wanted the death of British troops, who praised Osama Bin Laden and have a clearly stated desire to impose sharia law in the UK.
However, part can be explained by the activities of a group called "Muslims 4 Ken," which The Sunday Telegraph has established was run by the IFE's community affairs co-ordinator, Azad Ali, and an IFE ally, Anas al-Tikriti of the British Muslim Initiative.Mr Ali is listed on his personal web page as a "team member" of Muslims 4 Ken and on the Muslims 4 Ken site, along with one other person, as a "contributor".
On his IFE blog, Mr Ali has praised a key mentor of Osama bin Laden, described al-Qaeda as a "myth," and justified the killing of British troops in Iraq.
Surely anybody who wishes to enter public life, especially a political public life has to be checked, screened for any subversive affiliations to organizations that want to harm our country, if they are not screened - why not?
How is it possible that our political system allows such behaviours from an elected offical, to paraphraze Churchill - "there really is something rotten in Denmark"
The Taxpayer should demand the return of the 1.3 million , after all it is clearly a misuse of public funds and Livinstone must be prosecuted for using ;public money in such a way
Gandalf
I do hope you realise that even if we had a Geert Wilders in Britain, the Islamisation of Britain will only be slowed down.
Reason - Wilders will only remove Muslims who are criminals or wish to have sharia.
Muslim response will be to simply lie low, and wait till Wilders loses an election to another Lefty. Then normal Islmisation starts up again. In the meantime, the demographic Jihad is ongoing- Wilders or no.
In the not so distant future, Muslims will be strong enough to take over, or a civil war will start. Muslims by then will regard themselves as indeginous. Vicious civil war follows, with partition as the only way out. End of the UK.
Same scenario for all Western countries.
Reply to this
Ken Livingstone has repeatedly revealed himself to be a treacherous toad. Did you note that when he was playing to the muslim gallery in the mosque the other evening on Any Questions, Medhi Hasan repeatedly referred to the IFE as a "mainstream organisation". That it is "mainstream" so far as orthodox Islamic opinion goes cannot be disputed, but for naive non-Muslim listeners the term "mainstream" has very different connotations, so at the least Dimbleby should have asked him to clarify what he meant by "mainstream". That we now have our most influential public broadcaster allowing Islamists to describe themselves as "mainstream" just shows how far the rot has gone.
Ken was one of the original enthusiastic architects of our national and cultural destruction, and his courting of the Muslim vote in recent years reveals that the only interests he holds dear are his own short-term narrow personal ones. He is a disgrace.
Reply to this
Durotrigan wrote: That we now have our most influential public broadcaster allowing Islamists to describe themselves as "mainstream" just shows how far the rot has gone.
Rot indeed. It is quite likely that the BBC knew exactly what it was doing. the BBC has been an anti-Christian, anti-Israeli and pro-Islamic broadcaster for years. BBC knows full well that if they were even-handed, BBC reporters would have their throats slit.
Reply to this
We know were "Our most influential public broadcaster" is coming from following "Question Time"
"Justice" Minister Straw gave a long rant praising Britain's stand against fascism in WW2 and the need to do so still. When he finished Nick Griffin observed, "Fight fascism? My father served in the RAF fighting against fascism yours did not!"
This embarrassing detail was instantly squashed by "Our most influential public broadcaster" asking "Whats that got to do with it?" Most people would say if Griffins father only handed out blankets he did more to fight fascism than our Justice Ministers communist father who went to jail rather than serve.
Reply to this
Nothing surprises me about Loonet Livingston. He has always stood under a false flag when purporting to support labour. In reality, he has always been a member of the ultr-left Workers Revolutionary party who were ever-present during his misrule of the GLC.
Livingston is was and always will be a Commy. In the cold war, it was the commies that supported the so-called palestinian cause. They recruited an Egyptian student into the KGP, re-wrote his CV and put him in charge of the palestian liberation organisation. His name? Yasser Arafat.
Reply to this
Oops Typo - That should have read Looney Livingston
Reply to this
Up to 300 feared dead in central Nigeria clashes
Shuaibu Mohammed
JOS, Nigeria
Sun Mar 7, 2010 2:21pm EST
Related News
Timeline: Ethnic and religious unrest in Nigeria
Sun, Mar 7 2010
(Reuters) - Nigeria's acting president Sunday ordered the security forces to hunt down those behind clashes involving Muslim herders and Christian villagers in which more than 300 people may have been killed.
http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE6260X420100307
The BBC reports this as well, but give NO clue to who attacked and who were the victims.
Reply to this
Oil-rich Nigeria, population 140-million, now is very close to an all-out"Islamic takeover', warn two Dutch MPs. And this would have a massive impact: from Nigeria, Africa's islamisation would spread fast -- resulting in hundreds of millions of refugees.
This would have a massive impact on the future of all of Africa and of the West, warn Dutch parliamentarians Geert Wilders and Martin Bosma of the Party for Freedom, writing in an editorial in the Dutch religious daily, the Reformatorisch Dagblad.
http://www.digitaljournal.com/article/269323
What will happen if a civil war starts up again in Nigeria?
Muslims countries will naturally support the Muslims- financially, weapons wise, as well as with Jihadis. What will we do? Will we do what we did previously in Biaffra or just wring our hands and plead for restraint?
If we support the Christians, then that will be the start of a religious world war - Christians vs Muslims. Is this the only solution?
Let us examine what is happening all over the world.
Slice by salami slice, Islam will destroy everything. The only way is to the Islamisation of the West, is to stop Muslim immigration to the West, and then reverse it.
But this cannot be done, as it destroys our claim to be a tolerant liberal democracy. It is on the last, that Chaudary and Bakri stake their prediction, that Islam will win. We cant have both - tolerate Islam as well as keep liberal democracy. We have to thus abandon liberal democracy to start the process of removing Muslims from the West. Unfortunately, there is no possibility of this happening.
We are then looking at the demise of the West. Even Geert Wilders cannot stop this, as his policy is to remove only criminals and Muslim who publicly state that they want sharia. In any case, Geert Wilders will eventually be defeated in an election, while the demographic Jihad continues.
So what have we left? Nothing except war. In war, enemies self-segregate to mutually compatible camps/areas or national states. the added advantage is that we do not have to sacrifice our liberal democracy. After some time in war, an armstice can be declared, Muslims im Muslim nations etc.
Reply to this
Hospital escape killer on the run.
A prisoner detained under mental health laws for slitting the throat of a butcher is being hunted by police after escaping from hospital.
Fida Mohammed(Ah that name again) Utmanzi, 20, escaped from the North London Clinic in Church Street, Edmonton.
The killer was an insane asylum seeker from Afghanistan.
http://uk.news.yahoo.com/21/20100309/tuk-hospital-escape-killer-on-the-run-6323e80.html
It is not sufficient to be a Muslim from a Talebanised country such as Afghanistan.
It is not suffiecient that you should be homicidally insane.
The asylum seeker should fulfill both conditions.
Our asylum laws have been much stricter these days. Glory be, Lets elect Labour.
Reply to this
Given his liking for booze,it seems a bit odd that Red Ken should have his nose so far up the backside of islam
Reply to this
Looney Livingston will stick his nose up the backside of anyone he thinks will vote for him, so....whatever you do, don't bend over.
Reply to this
is accutane safe with crohns
[url=http://samplelife.ning.com/forum/topics/buy-accutane-justiceburg]Buy Accutane - justiceburg texas accutane litigation attorney[/url] accutane staph infection
[url=http://www.i-paymedia.com/forum/topics/buy-accutane-accutane-dosage]Buy Accutane - accutane dosage chart[/url] the truth about accutane
[url=http://dogtrainingnetwork.ning.com/forum/topics/buy-accutane-accutane-10]Buy">http://dogtrainingnetwork.ning.com/forum/topics/buy-accutane-accutane-10]Buy Accutane - accutane 10 glycolic[/url] accutane deaths
[url=http://acapamusik.ning.com/forum/topics/buy-accutane-accutane-waiver]Buy Accutane - accutane waiver[/url] babies deformed by accutane
[url=http://flipgatesworld.ning.com/forum/topics/buy-accutane-accutane-period]Buy Accutane - accutane period[/url] accutane boards
uppompeii1.uppompeii.com http://dogtrainingnetwork.ning.com/forum/topics/buy-accutane-accutane accutane crohns
Reply to this
furosemide %)) mail order lotensin 8PPP clonazepam mcywb atarax antihistamine =-[[
Reply to this