>
Islamofacists in Tower Hamlets and an extraordinary clash between Christians and Muslims in the heart of the Surrey commuter belt.
The ILE is really getting in a twist, this band of Muslims are now saying that anybody who opposes them should be drummed out of office, aaah such tolerance:-
So how should Muslims respond? Simply by getting rid of Fitzpatrick and any other MP that makes such allegations at the forthcoming General Election. Fitzpatrick has a surmountable majority of just over 7,000 votes. If Muslims in the constituency organise against him, they can either sweep him out of power or at least erode his majority into marginal territory. Muslims should demonstrate that they can vote tactically in the Election and show malcontents such as Fitzpatrick the door.
Tactical voting for an Islamic state is what the above is all about, the use of the word "malcontent" is significant, it demonstrates the complete intolerance of any other form of government or way of life - if you do not accept Islam you are a "malcontent"
The fact that the rigging has been exposed and that the Islamic agenda is the one that Tower Hamlets is following show to some degree that the democratic system works,
The objectives of this Islamic band of people is quite clear, they want unimpeded power to pursue their dream of an Islamic UK.
The Tower Hamlets council is now under special management, in other words it has been taken over by government appointed people. I do not know how this will pan out in the long term but in the short term it is a good thing, the Islamists have been stopped for now.
Many other boroughs should now be examined, the London Borough of Redbridge has to be high on the list, the vote rigging must be exposed and stopped and in addition to that there MUST be a limit on the numbers of Muslims in any elected authority - under no circumstances must a majority Muslim council be allowed in the UK.
I personally would set the limit for Muslims in a council at ZERO, but I know at this present time that will not happen.
The use of democracy can overcome the Islamic threat, the people of Surry have shown that and the people of Surrey also had a council that was not afraid of saying NO to the Muslims in the community.Victory was being celebrated yesterday in the leafy avenues and Victorian villas of Camberley.
In a triumph for local democracy, a plan to build a huge £3 million mosque with two 100ft minarets, which would have been visible from Sandhurst Royal Military Academy, was thrown out on Wednesday night by the town's councillors.
A thousand people from the affluent Surrey town queued to get into the meeting, some waiting for hours from 9am to get in.
They waved placards declaring: 'Camberley Says No', 'Hands Off Our Heritage' and 'We Want Justice.' When the result was announced, just before 11pm, there were jubilant roars inside the public meeting - and from the crowds outside.
Protesters claimed the plan for the mosque in the heart of Camberley was an inflammatory act of provocation by the Muslim community, intended to show their cultural superiority.
In return, the mosque's supporters accused them of being racist and hostile to the Islamic way of life.
Here was an extraordinary clash between Christians and Muslims in the heart of the Surrey commuter belt.
Well done Camberly, let us hope that your actions will spur on others who do not want the edifices of Islam on their doorstep
As you can see the people of Camberly were immediately labeled racist and islamohobic - hostile to the Islamic way of life'
Islam is overtly hostile to our way of life, the Muslims in Tower Hamlets have demonstrated that quite clearly, we must do the same to them, we must make it clear by whatever means that they are surplus to the requirements of the UK.
The Camberley decision and the appointment of Commissioners to run Tower Hamlets are two small steps in an uphill battle. Will the Government now realise what they are up against or are they too self-obsessed and Dhimmified to notice?
Reply to this
The Government is completely dhimmified I'm afraid Peter, as are the Conservatives, Liberal Democrats and, to a significant extent, UKIP (Lord Pearson being a notable exception). As the ongoing financial crisis becomes further entrenched, the Labour and Conservative dhimmis will grovel for ever-more Islamic finance. George Osborne's brother, after all, is a convert to the Mohammedan creed. For details see http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1233762/George-Osborne-brothers-Muslim-love-match-converts-Islam-marry-Bangladeshi-girl.html
Reply to this
Is Geert Wilders the new William of Orange?
The Kingdom of England is in a parlous state. Ruled by a rotten Scottish tyranny, the nation groans under the weight of oppressive, unconstitutional laws, the ruling elite is in the pay of its absolutist masters on the continent, and many Englishmen suspect their government is promoting an oppressive and reactionary religion against the will of the people.
The nation’s only hope is a charismatic young Dutchman fighting almost single-handedly against the creation of a united Europe under the rule of an unelected tyrant in Holland’s southern neighbour.
The Dutchman, coming to England’s aid, warns its people:
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/edwest/100028570/is-geert-wilders-the-new-william-of-orange/
We need a Geert Wilders. The leader of UKIP is one of only two parties that Geert Wilders PVV is linked with. UKIP's leader, Lord Pearson invited Wilders to London to present Fitna. Afterwards Wilders gave an interview. What was surprising was that because Wilders has taken the initiative, journalists were no longer baiting him, but asking questions about what his policies were going to be. There was the expectation that they were talking to the future PM of the Netherlands. Not any old PM, but one that was going to break away from the EU and much else besides. This would be a sea change. Coupled with the fact that the Germans are getting fed up, we have a new ball game - the EU could be in an end game.
Now Lord Pearson could have seized the moment to outline his policies, which are remarkably similar to Geert Wilders PVV. With a major UK party on board, all charges of fascist, racist etc would be annulled. Pearson though lost the moment, through fear or whatever, but he lost it.
Reply to this
We do indeed need a Geert Wilders DP111, but I'm afraid that, as you note, Lord Pearson did not seize the opportunity to outline his Islamisation stance, and I am sceptical that his position is shared by the majority of UKIP members. Witness Farage's recent wishy-washy response to the decision not to allow the Camberley mosque expansion to go ahead, where he stated "This was never about religion, but about the fair and just process that applies to everyone no matter what faith or belief." This utterance seems to betray his willingness to politick for the Muslim vote, and thus demonstrates that if UKIP did gain MPs they would in all likelihood be just as unwilling to criticise (let alone deal with) Islamisation as the Labour, Conservative and Liberal Democratic parties.
Reply to this
I really must apologise to Lord Pearson and DP111 for the dreadful typo in my last entry, for it should have read "outline his anti-Islamisation" rather than "Islamisation" stance. Heaven help us if the likes of Lord Pearson were to join the other side!
Reply to this
If UKIP is going to play the same old game, then there still are a few chioces left
1. SIOE - Steven Gash makes no distinction between Islam, islamism, radical Islam and and moderate Islam. This is just as it should be, for Muslim scholars insist that there is just islam and islam only.
2. BNP - but this has to be the last resort.
Reply to this
'Terrorist British Airways worker planned to take advantage of strike'
A British Airways worker who allegedly wanted to be a suicide bomber has been accused of offering to take advantage of the airline’s approaching strike to join the cabin crew.
Rajib Karim, 30, allegedly arrived in Britain from Bangladesh in 2006 to gain a passport for terrorist purposes.
He worked at a BA call centre in Newcastle dealing with passenger bookings and had access to the company’s computer system and details about airport security procedures.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/terrorism-in-the-uk/7421465/Terrorist-British-Airways-worker-planned-to-take-advantage-of-strike.html
Reply to this
"Labour MP Frank Dobson spoke to a mainly Bangladeshi audience in Tower Hamlets a few years ago and urged them to help themselves to benefits, education, services, housing and much, much more. All we had was rightfully theirs and we could never compensate enough for our past oppression." http://crombouke.blogspot.com/2010/02/labour-have-deliberately-destroyed.html
Reply to this
Just when you thought they could not get any crazier!
There is a campaign group coming on BBC Radio 2 Jeremy Vine show this afternoon who want people who are not going to give their vote to people overseas "Who have an interest in the outcome of British elections." They specifically mentioned people in Bangladesh as if the did not have disproportionate muscle already.
Reply to this
Damn typo
"who want people who are not going to vote to give their vote to people overseas"
Reply to this
Is there a link to the story of Tower Hamlets been taken over by government appointed administrators? I cannot see any report anywhere else, I have tried looking on the Internet and it's a job to hunt around the other threads on the site.
Reply to this
Guantanamo: £30m torture case bill for taxpayers
Compensation claims lodged against the Government by six former Guantanamo Bay detainees are likely to cost the taxpayer more than £30 million in legal bills, The Daily Telegraph has learnt.
Binyam Mohamed, who is at the centre of a row over Britain’s alleged complicity in torture, and five other men are each suing MI5 and MI6, claiming the security services were complicit in their alleged torture in custody.
They could be awarded between £200,000 and £500,000 each if they win their cases, but spiralling legal bills will dwarf any damages awards, as the joint action by the men is currently expected to take seven years to work its way through the courts.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/terrorism-in-the-uk/7337809/Guantanamo-30m-torture-case-bill-for-taxpayers.html
------------------------------------
These people were given refugee asylum status. The moment they had it, off they went to Jihad. Now we have to pay them compensation.
Only in the bizzarro world of the UK can this happen.
Reply to this
The only thing we can do is write to MP's and the press and scream the place down. Maybe then they will care what we think and not a bunch of "Uman rites" lawyers.
Meantime WHO are the lawyers getting the money and who is paying it? We know the names of the "detainees" but if they are screwing the public the public shoulld know who they are.
BTW If there is one good thing about this case it means we should not worry about muslims out breeding us. If it carries on like this they are all going to laugh their ***** off!
Reply to this
'In return, the mosque's supporters accused them of being racist and hostile to the Islamic way of life.'
What race is Islam? More people are getting it. The 'Islamic way of life' is indeed hostile to everyother way of life and should be stopped at every turn and in every way that it wishes to manifest itself on the social scene.
Reply to this
OUTCRY OVER HOME OFFICE ‘PANDERING’ TO MUSLIM POLICE
HOME Office chiefs were last night accused of pandering to Islam after it was revealed that they handed out a staggering 15 times more funding to a Muslim police support group than to its Christian equivalent.
A furious backlash followed revelations that the Christian Police Association received just £15,000 over the past five years while the National Association of Muslim Police was paid £90,000 in the past two years alone.
http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/162835/Outcry-over-Home-Office-pandering-to-Muslim-police
This is typical Labour - offering aid and comfort to the enemies of Britain.
Reply to this