>
http://www.geertwilders.nl/
Muslims re write the Bible - and Disney gets ripped off again
Islam is the most contentious of cults, there is nothing the followers of this stone age diktat will not do to harass and attack those who do not share their views.
Disney, the Mecca of the cartoon world (cartoons being something Muslims do not like at all) has now joined the " offenders of Islam club",
To gain membership of this rather dubious "club" the organization - or individual has to do something that Islam and it's followers do not like, and in today's World that is not difficult.
From the L A Times:-
A Muslim woman who works as a hostess at a Disney-owned restaurant fileda discrimination complaint against the entertainment giant Wednesday,saying they have repeatedly sent her home without pay for refusing toremove her headscarf at work.
Imane Boudlal said she has worked as a hostess at Storyteller's Café inDisney's Grand Californian Hotel & Spa for two years and beganwearing her hijab Sunday but was told she would have to remove it ortake a job working out of public view.
Disney has told a hijab wearing Muslim that she cannot wear a hijab whilst on public view, they have offered her alternative work "behind the scenes" and she has refused this.
Needless to say CAIR got in on the act, the fact that this lady had NOT bothered to wear a hijab for all of her two year employment with Disney tell it's own story, this is the first time she has worn it to work and she says she was respecting Ramadan
This is a sting, she is after the cash, she clearly had no problems with not wearing a hijab for the past two years Ramadan or not - why now.?
On a more serious note - the Muslims have decided to write a "forged Bible" they are calling all the biblical scriptures lies
Cairo - An Islamic publishing house in Egypt has published what is says is a 'forged' version of the Christian Bible
, angering the local Coptic Church, independent daily al-Masry al-Youm reported Thursday.
I think we all know the answer to that one - they would create mayhem.
This is a direct attack upon Christianity, it does not matter if you believe or not - that is not the point, Muslims are claiming the supremacy of their religion over another and as such are demonstrating that they have the right, to re-write, other people beliefs
What is next - The Torah, the Hindu scrolls, the Tibetan book of the dead, the list goes on.
To the Christian, the Muslims have committed the act of ultimate blasphemy, what could be more humiliating to the follower of ANY faith than to have your sacred texts re written by a barbarian cult.
What should the response be from the Christian world, in the past such an act would have launched a crusade - sadly in today's World this will not happen, we will have to wait and see if the Church does anything about this.
One person is however making a stand:-
Disney, the Mecca of the cartoon world (cartoons being something Muslims do not like at all) has now joined the " offenders of Islam club",
To gain membership of this rather dubious "club" the organization - or individual has to do something that Islam and it's followers do not like, and in today's World that is not difficult.
From the L A Times:-
A Muslim woman who works as a hostess at a Disney-owned restaurant fileda discrimination complaint against the entertainment giant Wednesday,saying they have repeatedly sent her home without pay for refusing toremove her headscarf at work.
Imane Boudlal said she has worked as a hostess at Storyteller's Café inDisney's Grand Californian Hotel & Spa for two years and beganwearing her hijab Sunday but was told she would have to remove it ortake a job working out of public view.
Disney has told a hijab wearing Muslim that she cannot wear a hijab whilst on public view, they have offered her alternative work "behind the scenes" and she has refused this.
Needless to say CAIR got in on the act, the fact that this lady had NOT bothered to wear a hijab for all of her two year employment with Disney tell it's own story, this is the first time she has worn it to work and she says she was respecting Ramadan
This is a sting, she is after the cash, she clearly had no problems with not wearing a hijab for the past two years Ramadan or not - why now.?
On a more serious note - the Muslims have decided to write a "forged Bible" they are calling all the biblical scriptures lies
Islamic publishing house releases "forged Bible
The owner of the Islamic Enlightenment Publishing House, AbuislamAbdullah, wrote in the introduction that the reason behind the book'spublication was to prove that there are several versions of the bible and that Christians had forged theirs.
What would be the response from Muslims if a publishing house in the UK or USA published their version of the Koran- because the one used by Muslims today was a pack of lies?I think we all know the answer to that one - they would create mayhem.
This is a direct attack upon Christianity, it does not matter if you believe or not - that is not the point, Muslims are claiming the supremacy of their religion over another and as such are demonstrating that they have the right, to re-write, other people beliefs
What is next - The Torah, the Hindu scrolls, the Tibetan book of the dead, the list goes on.
To the Christian, the Muslims have committed the act of ultimate blasphemy, what could be more humiliating to the follower of ANY faith than to have your sacred texts re written by a barbarian cult.
What should the response be from the Christian world, in the past such an act would have launched a crusade - sadly in today's World this will not happen, we will have to wait and see if the Church does anything about this.
One person is however making a stand:-
Spanish bishop emphasizes: No Islamic worship at cathedral, a former mosque
In the face of a Muslim campaign, Bishop Demetrio Fernández Gonzálezof the southern Spanish city of Córdoba, once the seat of Muslim powerin Spain, is remaining firm in his resolve not to permit Islamic worshipat the city’s cathedral. The cathedral was formerly a mosque, which inturn had been built on the site of a Catholic church.
“Would they be happy to do the same in any of their mosques?” he asked.“Absolutely not. Because I understand their religious feeling and theyhave to understand ours as well.”
Stop rubbing salt in the wound
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1-dPSh--CHU&feature=player_embedded
Reply to this
Then there is this which shows the suffering in Gaza
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HYKKxL1gDEg&feature=player_embedded
Reply to this
Quote: bothered to wear a hijab for all of her two year employment with Disney tell it's own story, this is the first time she has worn it to work and she says she was respecting Ramadan..
Why did she not wear the hijab for two years??
Because she had not been granted her citizenship. To her credit, the moment she had her citizenship of the USA, and there was no real possibility of her being thrown out, she immediately started her Jihad against Disney. You can't fault her on that. Its we who are the suckers - the all time suckers who make Henry Ford know he was right.
As for the girls in Muslim countries who are fighting for the right NOT to wear coverings, these very same girls or most of them, if in Western countries, will fight to WEAR them.
Its all about Islam. In Muslim countries, the fight to make it Islamic is over. They won, now they have to come to some understanding on how to run it. In the West, the Jihad is still on. Wearing the burqa or whatever, is a public statement of Islam in your face - "we are different and we will force you to accept our ways, and not the other way round".
In this context, if we understand the strategy of Jihad, the measure to make the burqa illegal, is a good one. In effect we are saying, that the rules are defined by us, which annoys Muslims. It does not matter if there are just a handful of women wearing the burqa - it is trumping the Islamic claim to superiority, and defining the mores of society, that is the issue.
The same applies to minarets.
Why such an outrage, when the mosque, the centre of worship was not affected by the ban, and just the pointy minarets were?
To Muslims, the ban on minarets, meant two things
1. That the mosque was being allowed as a charitable dispensation at the discretion of the Infidel authority, i.e.,submission to the Infidel law. The mosque without the minarets was really a castrated mosque - a symbol of subservience to the Infidel, then one of victory.
2. A Swiss mosque sans minarets, is viewed by Muslims, as a symbol of Infidel insult to Muslims.
This is the reason why Muslims are fighting to overturn the ban on minarets in Switzerland. Its a very strong symbolism to them.
Reply to this
gandalf
look in your moderation bag
Reply to this
She worked for two years with Disney with no problems.
Why?
Because she had not been granted her citizenship. To her credit, the moment she had her citizenship of the USA, and there was no real possibility of her being thrown out, she immediately started her Jihad against Disney. You can't fault her on that. Its we who are the suckers - the all time suckers who make Henry Ford know he was right.
As for the girls in Muslim countries who are fighting for the right NOT to wear coverings, these very same girls or most of them, if in Western countries, will fight to WEAR them.
Its all about Islam. In Muslim countries, the fight to make it Islamic is over. They won, now they have to come to some understanding on how to run it. In the West, the Jihad is still on. Wearing the burqa or whatever, is a public statement of Islam in your face - "we are different and we will force you to accept our ways, and not the other way round".
In this context, if we understand the strategy of Jihad, the measure to make the burqa illegal, is a good one. In effect we are saying, that the rules are defined by us, which annoys Muslims. It does not matter if there are just a handful of women wearing the burqa - it is trumping the Islamic claim to superiority, and defining the mores of society, that is the issue.
The same applies to minarets.
Why such an outrage, when the mosque, the centre of worship was not affected by the ban, and just the pointy minarets were?
To Muslims, the ban on minarets, meant two things
1. That the mosque was being allowed as a charitable dispensation at the discretion of the Infidel authority, i.e.,submission to the Infidel law. The mosque without the minarets was really a castrated mosque - a symbol of subservience to the Infidel, then one of victory.
2. A Swiss mosque sans minarets, is viewed by Muslims, as a symbol of Infidel insult to Muslims.
This is the reason why Muslims are fighting to overturn the ban on minarets in Switzerland. Its a very strong symbolism.
Reply to this