Here we have social engineering at its most sinister

The first question you have to ask is -why would anybody want to do a piece of "research" such as this?, I personally can see no merit in such a piece of "research"

From what I can see the only reason to do a study of this nature is to support the positive affirmation practices that are rampant in this country.

Once again the indigenous white male is reduced to secondary status to the black male and this "research" states that the indigenous white female prefers the black male.

I find this odd, if we go back over the centuries to a time when there were no black people in the UK, the female of the species did not reject the male because he was white or there were no black males to mate with, indeed the population grew and expanded without much problem.

This "research is an attempt to give the PC multiculturalists some kind of legitimacy, it is pure propaganda and quite frankly insulting.

It is said that the people were asked their preference of facial types during the "research", did the "researchers" factor in the fact that many people would have said that they prefer black because not to do so would have opened them to charges of racism?

This is overt promotion of the black male over the white male, a determined attempt to diminish the status of the white male in the UK, but why should anybody want to do this - it's called cultural replacement - devalue the culture, devalue the people that follow that culture - emasculate the men of that culture as they are the ones that will usually rebel and fight back.

The survey shows that both white men and women preferred black partners, this is completely destructive , it sends out the signal that the white male is not attracted to the white female and vice versa - this of course is farcical in the extreme as is the "research".

Here we have social engineering at its most sinister and there is one other aspect of this  that concerns me
and that is -WHO would commission such research, that would be really interesting to know.

The danger of this kind of so called research is that the media pick up on it and start shaping their various presentations around it, you will see white males portrayed in effeminate roles in advertizing or silly demeaning roles whereas the black male will be shown as alpha male and have white females drooling over him. The same applies to programmes where the white male is subservient to the black male - not equal to but subservient, this is race profiling - devalue one - promote the other - equalities has nothing to do with it

Here is the article - for what it's worth

Scientists have discovered that white people tend to choose other races when asked to rate which faces they find most attractive.

The scientists discovered that white men prefer the facial features of Asian women while white women go for the faces of black men.

Men and women aged between 18 and 30 were shown 600 faces of the opposite sex and asked to grade them for attractiveness.

The women tended to go for black male faces, followed by white and then Asian.

Men plumped for Asian women, followed by white, then black.

The Department of Psychology at Cardiff University, which carried out the study, says the results of their research are reflected in society.

Government figures show around one-and-a-half times more black men marrying white women than the other way around in the UK.

More white men have also been found to marry East Asian women - compared to Asian men marrying white women.

Dr Michael Lewis, who led the research project, said: ‘It will come as no surprise to many that facial attractiveness makes up part of the decision of who we marry.

‘And it's no coincidence that groups perceived as more attractive - black males and Asian females - feature more often in mixed-race marriages.

‘In the past more measurable features such as wealth, status and fertility have been considered more important in how we choose out partners.

‘Our study matches the same patterns observed in the Government's data on marriage.’

Posted by Gandalf at 11 Feb 2012, 5:20 PM
Categories: uncategorized

Previous Post
Next Post

 

What did you think of this article?




Trackbacks
Trackback specific URL for this post
  • Trackbacks are closed for this post.
Comments
Display comments as (Linear | Threaded)

Leave a comment

 Name

 Email (will not be published)

 Website

Your comment is 0 characters limited to 3000 characters.