The goverment are the real villains in the Abu Qatada affair
A great deal has been said about Abu Qatada over the past few days indeed the media has been full of him and his family who are all laughing at the impotence of this country.
All this attention to Qatada has taken the attention off the real villains in this farrago.
The real villains are in fact the government and it's Home Office, they have singularly and without deviation remained steadfast in their resolve NOT to deport Abu Qatada.
Yes there has been much rhetoric from said government and Home Office , " we are exploring ways in which we can deport him" etc, etc. We all know that it is not going to happen, Qatada will stay here nurtured by the state, he will continue to peddle his hatred and I would not be at all surprised if he became a government adviser on Islamic extremism.
Our government says it cannot overrule the EU ruling that says Qatada cannot be deported, they hide behind this, the government can if it wishes to do so just send Qatada to Jordan, Jordan will gladly accept him back so there is not a problem.
Our government - despite recent utterings from Cameron that they will challenge the EU and maintain the UK sovereignty have completely caved in - yet again to the unelected masters of the UK - the EU commissions.
Let us assume that Qatada is shipped out, what will the EU do, will they fine the UK - OK we just don't pay, what will they do then - invade us! - I don't think so, apply sanction on trade etc, no that won't happen because their trade with us is much larger than ours with them, and with the Euro collapsing and the EU coming apart at the seams they need that trade plus the £50 million per day we give to the EU.
The UK will not go against the EU because if it did it would be the end, other countries would follow suit, the union would fail and the great experiment would crash.
Cameron is a Europhile and for the sake of his governments political future we the public have to suffer the presence of people in this country who clearly wish to harm it.
Does anybody out there honestly believe that Abu Hamza will be handed over to the Americans? - of course he won't he will be freed, some minor conditions placed upon him, he will be supported by the state and he will pick up where he left off outside Finsbury Mosque.
Our government is weak and indecisive, it is the puppet of Merkosy and the EU commissioners.
The people of the UK are regularly subjected to atrocious crimes committed by Muslims, these crimes are not reported as hate crimes, you will no doubt have seen the many links to such atrocities posted in the comments sections on this site, how can the government allow a man who supports this kind of attack upon the people of this land be allowed to walk the streets?.
The government will not do anything about this simply because it will offend Islam and the OIC, indeed the OIC are close to getting UN backing for a World wide ban on criticizing Islam
Thank you anonymous
KUALA LUMPUR, Feb 13 (Bernama) -- The Organisation of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) is to hold a media workshop in Brussels on Feb 15 to 16 pertaining to the smear campaigns against Islam in newspapers and media institutions in the West.
Resolution 16/18 aims to combat intolerance, negative stereotyping and stigmatisation of discrimination, incitement to violence, and violence against persons based on religion or belief.
The resolution was an outcome of bilateral talks between the OIC and a number of Western countries, including the U.S. Two meetings were held in Istanbul and Washington, respectively, to develop operational mechanisms to implement the resolution at the level of the United Nations.
Reports say Resolution 16/18, which was adopted by the United Nations Human Rights Council in Geneva in March 2011, was backed by U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton at the most recent Istanbul Process Conference in Washington in December.
The real atrocity that has been committed is the willful disregard of the wishes of the people of this country.
The media plays it's part in this atrocity, the BBC has instructed it's "Journalists" not to call Qatada an extremist
The BBC has told its journalists not to describe Abu Qatada as an extremist.
Corporation bosses said reporters should avoid making a ‘value judgement’ – and that he should be referred to as radical instead.
This is despite the fact Qatada was known as ‘Al Qaeda’s spiritual leader in Europe’.
Our MP's continue to sabre rattle, in reality they are empty vessels , you can tell by the amount of noise they make

>



http://www.geertwilders.nl/







http://www.24dash.com/news/housing/2012-02-15-Womans-100-000-benefit-fraud-largest-council-has-ever-uncovered
Reply to this
http://www.london24.com/news/politics/tower_hamlets_mayor_slammed_over_21_special_advisers_paid_for_by_council_tax_1_1210784
Reply to this
http://www.theargus.co.uk/news/9535802.Video__Stalker_brought_to_justice/
Reply to this
http://menmedia.co.uk/manchestereveningnews/news/crime/s/1485439_drivers-who-mowed-down-caring-dad-while-racing-through-longsight-are-jailed
Reply to this
I don't care a whit about Qatada, Hamza, Chaudary. The real threat is the demographic one, and that comes from the so-called "moderate" Muslim community.
Reply to this
I have often thought that these freaks provide the cover for thye rest. Whilst everyone is jumping up and down yelling deport them,stop their benefits,jail them,it allows the religion of peace fantasy to roll along. These people are just the tiny minority....blah blah blah
Reply to this
Very true.
These 'hate figures' act as a distraction in many ways.
People can say they want to deport these characters but welcome 'the moderates' - and all the time the demographic conquest continues.
Reply to this
re: moderate Muslims
Remember how we were told that the Arab spring would give rise to freedom and liberty etc etc. Why? Because as we have been told since 9/11, that the radical Muslims are a small minority, while the majority in a Muslim country are moderates, and wish nothing but freedom.
Well the elections came, and we have an overwhelming vote for the radicals. Now unless the vote was so rigged that only the radical Islamic vote was counted, it can be safely said that the majority in any Muslim country are not moderates but radicals.
That is one good that has come of the Arab Spring – it has shown the true nature of the Muslim public mind.
What holds in the Muslim world, also holds in the West.
Reply to this
http://vladtepesblog.com/?p=44404
Reply to this